Re: Another Thread Locked to Protect the Bullies...

[Goofproof]

If it could only be moved a little farther than the Archives, I'm thinking total Deletion until the end of time. Jim

The Goodmans are loathe to actually delete anything....only done in extreme cases.
So while I could delete these threads....I know that is something only done in extreme cases and now that the offending posts were remove by Carolyn today...she left the other comments and I don't dare mess with them.
Besides...they aren't really hurting anything and when people get bored from talking about this and no longer comment here...it will fade away.

I know you prefer total removal...but that's simply not going to happen.
It is what it is.

We are aware, and I thank you and Carolyn for the jobs you do. But we know it's not done, someone will dig them out and post over them. They live forever or until hard drives fail. Personally, I have 6 TB, backed up twice! Jim

[Midwest_non_sleeper]

not included in the awesome criminal picture.

Your C.O. said there was something in your past that prevented you from being vetted for undercover work.

C.O. could mean two different things. Corrections Officer, or Commanding Officer. I think you mean the latter, but you could mean the former, which would be an insinuation. Either way, I'm ok with it, since they're both probably correct at some point in my wayward life.

[Midwest_non_sleeper]

Edit: I'm slightly offended that I was not included in the awesome criminal picture. I demand to be included. If you don't include me, I shall call you the King of Bullies and make constant threads stating such, which will then cause Pugsy to get involved and then I shall lump her in with the atrocious people that she is defending and then attack her as well.

I understand that my profile picture can not seriously be photoshopped onto a human body, therefore I demand that it be placed on the side of a WWII Battleship. An AH-64 Apache attack helicopter will also suffice.

Well since you demanded so nice.


Midwest_attack_vertibird.jpg

Most excellent picture, I shall cherish it forever, but we really should have a discussion on exactly what an AH-64 Apache looks like...

Edit: I may have necro'ed this thread. That's ok, now it matches my heart.

[Goofproof]

not included in the awesome criminal picture.

Your C.O. said there was something in your past that prevented you from being vetted for undercover work.

C.O. could mean two different things. Corrections Officer, or Commanding Officer. I think you mean the latter, but you could mean the former, which would be an insinuation. Either way, I'm ok with it, since they're both probably correct at some point in my wayward life.

Also Conscientious Objector, I doubt it applies to you. Jim

I have always found fault with that term, I don't see them having a Conscience.

[RonS]

looks like the valiant Knight is gone

Yep...looks like I now own the thread.
He's gone along with all his posts. Only time you might see something he said is if it is in a reply as a quote made by someone else.
If it's horribly offensive...I can edit that part out but it's not a big deal....all this stuff will fade into the archives soon enough.

I have no dog in this fight. I don't know/care who is right, who is wrong.
I just want to say "Thank You!!!" for taking a firmer hand to keep things civil.
Difference (and even heated difference) of opinion is fine, ad hominem attack destroys a forum.
Yours is among the most difficult and thankless jobs a conscientious person can take on.

GOOD LUCK and thanks again

[Midwest_non_sleeper]

not included in the awesome criminal picture.

Your C.O. said there was something in your past that prevented you from being vetted for undercover work.

C.O. could mean two different things. Corrections Officer, or Commanding Officer. I think you mean the latter, but you could mean the former, which would be an insinuation. Either way, I'm ok with it, since they're both probably correct at some point in my wayward life.

Also Conscientious Objector, I doubt it applies to you. Jim

I have always found fault with that term, I don't see them having a Conscience.

Yeah, I'm pretty...far from a "conscientious objector". "Combat Operator" would be a more appropriate descriptor.