tyrinryan wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:24 pm
It looks like Rescan does not have a Rera graph line. Could that video be a from the S9 vintage.
ResScan will flag RERAs if the model machine flags them but that's an old video based on the S9 models which didn't flag RERAs. Sorry but that's the only easy way of showing you what ResScan shows.
tyrinryan wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2020 10:24 pm
do you have any thoughts on the accuracy of the Resmed algorithm charting the Rera's?
No real thoughts other than I have to trust the manufacturers and rely on what they say they can do. I am sure it was tested extensively and probably compared to sleep studies with humans in attendance who have direct access to sleep status. So they probably have data comparing human scored RERAs to human scored RERAs to back them up with their claims.
There has to be sleep for there to be a RERA. You have to be asleep for there to be an arousal. Since the machine really can't determine sleep status....well, that's a potential limitation of the data.
I personally don't see RERAs hardly ever so I haven't ever really been able to do any of my own detective work to see if a flagged RERA might be a false positive or not.
There's probably some ResMed documentation somewhere on how reliable the RERA flagging by the machine is compared to human scoring but I haven't bothered to look for it. Just haven't had the need or desire to look.
I do know that all brands of machines can and will flag awake breathing irregularities at times as some sort of apnea event.
It wouldn't surprise me to know that RERAs could also potentially be false positive flagging but I have no proof.
If we aren't asleep...it's not a real asleep event and doesn't count.
When I can't tell or don't know for sure if something is asleep related or awake related I always err on the side of caution and treat it like it is real though. If I can't prove something is awake related false positive then I treat it like it was a real asleep flagged whatever.
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.