Should Trump Jump Up?

[SleepyEyes21]

[ (I can't believe this thread is still going.)

And, it will continue until the end of the nite on Nov., 8th.

And then some, I'm sure because SO many people will want to congratulate her for beating a man (especially THAT one.)

[Lucyhere]

[ (I can't believe this thread is still going.)

And, it will continue until the end of the nite on Nov., 8th.

And then some, I'm sure because SO many people will want to congratulate her for beating a man (especially THAT one.)

Brilliant! Now why didn't I think of that!

[Goofproof]

[ (I can't believe this thread is still going.)

And, it will continue until the end of the nite on Nov., 8th.

Much longer than that, the I told you so posts, the whining, on and on forever! Jim

[cands]

.....and the rest of the world will collectively sigh in relief!

[SleepyMcgee]

[ (I can't believe this thread is still going.)

And, it will continue until the end of the nite on Nov., 8th.

Much longer than that, the I told you so posts, the whining, on and on forever! Jim

Unfortunately you are right. The trumpeteers will not go away quietly. Hopefully trump starts a network and there conspiracy theories and constant whining can all be corralled there!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SleepyMcgee]

I don't believe that stuff about the "17 Intelligence agencies". I think Hillary just threw that out at the debate, knowing that a lot of people might just believe it.

As of 10/21/16, HRC had a 6.6 percentage-point lead in the popular vote, and an 87 percent chance of winning the Electoral College.

Doesn't that tell you that MANY people are aware that HRC didn't just throw that out there?

Don't you understand?? I believe, as does almost 50% of the population, that this polling is rigged in Hillary's favor. The mainstream media is owned and operated by the same gang of oligarch crooks that are trying to put Hillary in the Presidency so they don't lose the gravy train they have enjoyed under Baby Bush and Obama. There is a lot of evidence that these polls are heavily skewed toward Democratic voters. Anyway, I am not the type of person who just goes over the cliff with the rest of the sheep. I think I am smarter than that.

Do you remember the Brexit vote? That was the vote that resulted in Great Britain planning to leave the European Union. For months, the mainstream media reported that the polls were heavily in favor of "remain". It was supposed to be a slam dunk. However, the alternative media were skeptical. When the votes were in, the "leave" took it. You simply cannot believe these polls in a world where certain powers are throwing billions of dollars at making sure the politicians they own win. This was also a populist vote.

Ok so you don't like Zerohedge, check this out. I read many alternative media sites. Here is one about Hillary's lies. Honestly, those people who believed everything Hillary said in the last debate just don't know much about what is going on in the world. And you can bet that the MM is trying to make sure, by errors of commission and omission, that the populace does not know what is really going on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fclM0-j5KLs

Being a conspiracy theorist is a fun hobby but it must be so time consuming? Tons of good entertainment sites (like the ones you've noted) making a killing off of people wanting to escape reality though for sure.

Remember when the Holland tunnel was 'suspected by the alternate media' to be a tunnel directly to the vatican that JFK was building? That was awesome.

[PEF]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

[49er]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

So would that include all the media outlets who prior to endorsing Hillary had never endorsed a Democrat for President?

49er

[Julie]

Certifiable. Clinically paranoid. Believes in an alternate reality. Just the person to elect as leader of the free world. Kim Jung Un would be better!

[SleepyMcgee]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

You mean the reality where man hasn't walked on the moon, a tunnel to Rome was being built by JFK, a Muslim lives in the whitehouse, ISIS parades happen in Michigan, black helicopters take guns away and required reading include the Zion scrolls and Report from iron mountain?






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SleepyMcgee]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

So would that include all the media outlets who prior to endorsing Hillary had never endorsed a Democrat for President?

49er

They have been infiltrated by the Clintons and/or a vast Zionist shadow organization. That's why you can only trust people like Alex jones now. Even that sissy Glenn beck has been 'altered'...I'm leaning towards a control chip on that one frankly.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[klv329]

No, Trump has" to stick it out" because we haven't started the office pool on the loss margin. But the fact that he made it this far....amazing.

[PEF]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

So would that include all the media outlets who prior to endorsing Hillary had never endorsed a Democrat for President?

49er

This issue has absolutely nothing to do with Democrat vs Republican. If this is what you think, than you have missed the entire point. And I am not either "far-right" nor Republican. Many years ago, I considered myself a Republican. Now I would style myself an Independent. I have voted both Republican and Democrat in the recent past. I lean toward the Democrats on social issues (I am in favor of abortion and gay rights, for example) and more toward being a fiscal conservative (which neither Democrats or Republicans are today).

The real issues can be described much more accurately as "Establishment" (legacy money) VS Populism (that which benefits the general populace).

I don't think the country is going in the right direction to benefit the general population.

[49er]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

So would that include all the media outlets who prior to endorsing Hillary had never endorsed a Democrat for President?

49er

This issue has absolutely nothing to do with Democrat vs Republican. If this is what you think, than you have missed the entire point. And I am not either "far-right" nor Republican. Many years ago, I considered myself a Republican. Now I would style myself an Independent. I have voted both Republican and Democrat in the recent past. I lean toward the Democrats on social issues (I am in favor of abortion and gay rights, for example) and more toward being a fiscal conservative (which neither Democrats or Republicans are today).

The real issues can be described much more accurately as "Establishment" (legacy money) VS Populism (that which benefits the general populace).

I don't think the country is going in the right direction to benefit the general population.

So how does voting for a guy that has been compared to Hitler solve the problem?

[SleepyMcgee]

Oh, I can assure you I enjoy it immensely. At least I deal with reality. I wouldn't trade it for anything, especially not all the media toys our govt. supplies us to keep us from suspecting the truth.

So you enjoy your thing and I will enjoy mine.

So would that include all the media outlets who prior to endorsing Hillary had never endorsed a Democrat for President?

49er

This issue has absolutely nothing to do with Democrat vs Republican. If this is what you think, than you have missed the entire point. And I am not either "far-right" nor Republican. Many years ago, I considered myself a Republican. Now I would style myself an Independent. I have voted both Republican and Democrat in the recent past. I lean toward the Democrats on social issues (I am in favor of abortion and gay rights, for example) and more toward being a fiscal conservative (which neither Democrats or Republicans are today).

The real issues can be described much more accurately as "Establishment" (legacy money) VS Populism (that which benefits the general populace).

I don't think the country is going in the right direction to benefit the general population.

That seems like a reasonable position to have right now. But it doesn't answer the question that was asked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk