Moisture

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
Jan Watkins

Moisture

Post by Jan Watkins » Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:54 pm

If the C-Pap machine is supposed to be the ultimate answer to sleep apnea, why hasn't someone perfected the machine so there is not so many problems with moisture? In reading over the c-pap talk it seems that it is the most talked about issue and aggravation. Jan Watkins

RipVW
Posts: 1684
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:29 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Moisture

Post by RipVW » Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:20 am

That mositure, or "rainout," is an issue for many until they find the right fix, and there are many that work: hose cover, turning the humidifier setting down or off (I use my HH with no heat, just "passive" humidification), heated hose (e.g. Aussie Heated hose). There's really no way the CPAP machine can control for this by itself, since the rainout is just condensation that naturally accumulates inside the hose when the room air is cooler than the warmed humid air on the inside of the hose.
Image
Check out my chinstrap--> http://cpapchinstraps.com
Image

User avatar
LoQ
Posts: 1475
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:59 pm
Location: America

Re: Moisture

Post by LoQ » Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:26 pm

Jan Watkins wrote:If the C-Pap machine is supposed to be the ultimate answer to sleep apnea, why hasn't someone perfected the machine so there is not so many problems with moisture? In reading over the c-pap talk it seems that it is the most talked about issue and aggravation. Jan Watkins
The manufacturers of these devices, as clever as they are, can't change the laws of physics.

They probably could solve the moisture problem, resulting in a machine that is:
1. much more expensive, even for those who don't need the solution at all or all the time
2. having a much less flexible hose, again harming those who don't need the solution.

There are many solutions to this problem available as an add-on and also as DIY for the frugal. I think this is pretty ideal, actually, because it doesn't burden everyone with the cost and other downsides of a solution that only some will need. It allows each person to choose the price-point solution that meets their needs. Everyone wins this way.

A set of solutions to choose from is better than being stuck with a "one size fits all" solution, at least with this problem.

User avatar
kopoloff
Posts: 398
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 5:20 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: Moisture

Post by kopoloff » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:54 am

There is a solution to the condensation problem. It will solve the problem once and for all, in probably every circumstance.

We need a dual wall hose, with an air gap between the inner and outer walls. This can have a low flow rate of warm air to keep the inner wall at an elevated temperature.

Why isn't this solution available? Take your pick from the following

Too costly
Non robust engineering
We don't scream loudly enough about it
The hose would lack flexibility
The hose would be bulkier
More stuff to set up, maintain, and lug around when we're travelling

K

User avatar
tenspeed
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:09 pm

Re: Moisture

Post by tenspeed » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:14 am

Jan Watkins wrote:If the C-Pap machine is supposed to be the ultimate answer to sleep apnea, why hasn't someone perfected the machine so there is not so many problems with moisture?
I don't have any problem with moisture.
If I did, I would get one of those fabric hose covers. I wouldn't want a double walled hose - too bulky.