Why is my Remstar Auto-M not responding to Hypopneas?

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
johntee
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:36 pm

Why is my Remstar Auto-M not responding to Hypopneas?

Post by johntee » Mon May 28, 2007 7:24 am

Hi, I'm on my second night of Auto (was using CPAP at 7.5cm before) and I'm seeing that my Remstar Auto M-Series is not responding to some Hypopneas (not raising the pressure)... Isn't that the point of the Auto function?

It's raising it in response to some (although it usually waits until there's a second Hypopnea before responding), but for some reason not others.

The Max is 4cm higher than the highest number it's ever used, and these weren't Hypopneas that occured after 3 successive bumps. It just let the pressure cruise along at the Minimum, and didn't bother to increase the pressure when it saw these particular Hypopneas...

Is this normal behavior?

Image

Full charts: http://site.break4dogs.com/images/perso ... 7_0527.pdf

Thanks!
John

_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): CPAP, Hypopnea, auto

Last edited by johntee on Tue May 29, 2007 11:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jskinner
Posts: 1475
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 9:21 pm
Location: Greenwich, Nova Scotia, Canada
Contact:

Post by jskinner » Mon May 28, 2007 10:14 am

Your numbers look excellent to me. If you really wanted to you could try raising your minimum pressure by 1cm to see if it would reduce the hypos even more.
Encore Pro Analyzer Author
Facebook Apnea Group

User avatar
Snoredog
Posts: 6399
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:09 pm

Post by Snoredog » Tue May 29, 2007 12:17 am

why didn't it respond?

Most likely the Minimum 7cm pressure was enough to eliminate them, yet not high enough to prevent them.

If you want to eliminate them, you will have to increase your Minimum pressure.
someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...

User avatar
blarg
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by blarg » Tue May 29, 2007 1:09 am

Snoredog wrote:Most likely the Minimum 7cm pressure was enough to eliminate them, yet not high enough to prevent them.
I have no idea what you're talking about. And yes, we know, you flip me off, and that's how this is going to "end". Whatever, I'm just trying to figure out how it could have eliminated them if they're still there.
I'm a programmer Jim, not a doctor!

User avatar
Snoredog
Posts: 6399
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:09 pm

Post by Snoredog » Tue May 29, 2007 2:52 am

blarg wrote:
Snoredog wrote:Most likely the Minimum 7cm pressure was enough to eliminate them, yet not high enough to prevent them.
I have no idea what you're talking about. And yes, we know, you flip me off, and that's how this is going to "end". Whatever, I'm just trying to figure out how it could have eliminated them if they're still there.
I stopped responding to your idiotic questions some time ago, haven't you noticed.
someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...

User avatar
blarg
Posts: 1407
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by blarg » Tue May 29, 2007 4:36 am

Snoredog wrote:I stopped responding to your idiotic questions some time ago, haven't you noticed.
Only thing idiotic I've seen here is your original statement.

Go ahead, get out the picture, we've all seen it plenty.

All I want you to do is explain your original sentence, is that so hard?
I'm a programmer Jim, not a doctor!

User avatar
tillymarigold
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post by tillymarigold » Tue May 29, 2007 7:07 am

blarg wrote:All I want you to do is explain your original sentence, is that so hard?
For the benefit of the OP, *I'll* explain the original statement.

Snoredog believes that a pressure of 7cm is enough to stop johntee's hypopneas once they start, therefore the machine does not need to increase pressure to eliminate the hypopnea. However, it is not high enough to prevent them before they start, only to stop them once they already have begun. (i.e. Once johntee's airway starts to close, 7cm will open it back up, but it will not keep the airway from closing.)


johntee
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:36 pm

Post by johntee » Tue May 29, 2007 9:32 am

tillymarigold wrote:Snoredog believes that a pressure of 7cm is enough to stop johntee's hypopneas once they start, therefore the machine does not need to increase pressure to eliminate the hypopnea. However, it is not high enough to prevent them before they start, only to stop them once they already have begun. (i.e. Once johntee's airway starts to close, 7cm will open it back up, but it will not keep the airway from closing.)
I'll admit to not understanding that... The machine shouldn't have some pre-determined idea of what my "number" is. If it sees an event, isn't it supposed to increase the then-current pressure to try to stop them? Then if no luck after 3 pressure bumps, it can give up and label it Non-Responsive.

Last night, I increased the Minimum Pressure to 8 (Max still at 13). Numbers got a little better, but now in almost every case, it ignores the Hypopnea events (and even ignored one Apnea event) -- never tried to increase pressure as a response. Kept cruising along at the minimum.

I've highlighted the Hypopneas that it didn't respond to in yellow and the Apnea it didn't respond to in green:
  • Image
Am I misunderstanding how the Auto is supposed to respond? Thanks!

Full chart is at: http://site.break4dogs.com/images/perso ... 7_0528.pdf
_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): Hypopnea, auto

Last edited by johntee on Tue May 29, 2007 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gerald
Posts: 1352
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:32 pm
Location: Central Louisiana

Post by Gerald » Tue May 29, 2007 11:05 am

John......

Although I'm certainly not an expert, I think the machine "chases snores"....and increases pressure when it senses vibrations. I'm not sure if it's software is sophisticated enough to detect Hypopneas.

A Hypopnea is "almost" an Apnea.....and how would it "know"?

I find that my pressure increases when the machine senses "snores".

Finally, I urge you to install jskinner's "Analyzer" software. It'll help you see where you need to set the machine....just higher than where the Hypopneas and Apneas begin to occur. "Analyzer" helped me fine tune my rig....and I think it will help you the same way. Jskinner doesn't charge for it, but it's nice to send a few bucks to help him defray the cost of development.

Gerald


User avatar
Snoredog
Posts: 6399
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:09 pm

Post by Snoredog » Tue May 29, 2007 11:55 am

johntee wrote:
tillymarigold wrote:Snoredog believes that a pressure of 7cm is enough to stop johntee's hypopneas once they start, therefore the machine does not need to increase pressure to eliminate the hypopnea. However, it is not high enough to prevent them before they start, only to stop them once they already have begun. (i.e. Once johntee's airway starts to close, 7cm will open it back up, but it will not keep the airway from closing.)
I'll admit to not understanding that... The machine shouldn't have some pre-determined idea of what my "number" is. If it sees an event, isn't it supposed to increase the then-current pressure to try to stop them? Then if no luck after 3 pressure bumps, it can give up and label it Non-Responsive.

Last night, I increased the Minimum Pressure to 8 (Max still at 13). Numbers got a little better, but now in almost every case, it ignores the Hypopnea events (and even ignored one Apnea event) -- never tried to increase pressure as a response. Kept cruising along at the minimum.

I've highlighted the Hypopneas that it didn't respond to in yellow and the Apnea it didn't respond to in green:

<snipped>Am I misunderstanding how the Auto is supposed to respond? Thanks!
It is exactly how Tilly described it above. It is not that the machine is NOT responding to those events, it knows it doesn't have to, because they are going away at current pressure based upon the duration they are lasting.

There WAS improvement seen going from 7cm to 8cm. Assuming everything was identical to the night before, FL's are completely gone, OA's were reduced to Zero and the number of HI's went down.

If you want to completely eliminate an event from showing up on the report, you have to increase the Minimum pressure to do that. The Autopap will always let some events go by, it does store breathing "patterns" in volatile memory and when it sees another pattern matching that in memory or hard coded in the algorithm it will respond with pressure.

The machine knows what your normal breathing patterns look like, that is pretty easy for it to learn those patterns. If it then sees a HI lasting 15seconds in duration and it goes away doing nothing (remaining at current pressure), when it sees the next HI and it lasts only 12seconds it will again do nothing, if it sees another HI that lasts 20 seconds (5 seconds longer than the first one) then it may start to trigger a response. The indicators of that happening was in your first reports where FL's were seen. If the obstructive event didn't last 10 seconds in duration then that event was a FL.

It is not that the machine is not responding to those events seen, it is more likely they are not lasting long enough for the machine to trigger a response.
If the machine sees they are going away on their own at current pressure, it may do nothing in response to them.

Those regular pressure "probes" seen on your report is the machine probing for events. Your reports look good, you really don't need to change anything.

If you look at your report and you see for half the night it increases pressure from the Minimum by 1cm to eliminate events, you might as well just bump the Minimum up by that amount and it should prevent those events. But there are trade offs with increased pressure, machine gets louder, mask leaks become a bigger problem and some adverse side effects may start to occur such as aerophagia.

At current 8cm Minimum pressure you can now count the number of events seen on your report with just a glance. While the events don't necessarily have to follow any sequence, most obstructive type events do and increase in severity similar to below:

Flow Limitation->Hypopnea->Snore->Apnea

So now IF you assign an arbitrary pressure to each of those above you might see 7, 8, 9 or 10 with Apnea the most severe requiring 10cm to clear. You were at 7cm and FL's were seen, increasing to 8cm eliminated those and reduced the frequency of the HI's seen. Now if you want to eliminate the residual HI's seen you will need to again increase Minimum pressure up from 8cm to 9cm to eliminate those.

You don't have any Snores to speak of, but you can see snores usually happen right before an apnea, so that is why most autopaps chase a snore aggressively. Apply the needed pressure to eliminate the snore you can most likely eliminate the following Apnea.

Your overall AHI is under 5 which is Normal.

someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...

johntee
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:36 pm

Post by johntee » Tue May 29, 2007 12:34 pm

Snoredog wrote:If you want to completely eliminate an event from showing up on the report, you have to increase the Minimum pressure to do that. The Autopap will always let some events go by
...
It is not that the machine is not responding to those events seen, it is more likely they are not lasting long enough for the machine to trigger a response. If the machine sees they are going away on their own at current pressure, it may do nothing in response to them.
...
You were at 7cm and FL's were seen, increasing to 8cm eliminated those and reduced the frequency of the HI's seen. Now if you want to eliminate the residual HI's seen you will need to again increase Minimum pressure up from 8cm to 9cm to eliminate those.
...
Your overall AHI is under 5 which is Normal.
Hi Snoredog. It's finally starting to make some sense...
And the part of the puzzle that I think just fell into place for me is that (surprise, surprise!) I think my titration number is not correct...
They started me at a pressure of 5cm, and I slept without any events at all for about 3 hours. Then a couple Hypopneas hit and they bumped me to 7cm after the next one hit. The bump to 7cm woke me up for the rest of the night. But I felt GREAT after that 3-1/2 hours of sleep with no events.

So that's what I've been chasing, thinking the zero events is what I need to make me feel like that again. I realized today from looking at my Titration study and Baseline study, that the Hypopneas seem to hit me in REM (which I was not getting much of before CPAP). So when I hit the Hypopneas at the start of my second REM stage in the Titration study, that's pretty much when they woke me up by going to 7cm. I'm guessing that if I had continued to sleep, they would have seen the Hypopneas continue even at 7cm, and they would have titrated me higher (similar to the 8+, probably 9cm, that seems to be needed based on the Auto-M results).

Does that theory seem sound? And not inconsistent with what you see on my charts?
That theory at least lets me stop feeling like I'm chasing the buggers further and further away from my titration results (which had left me feeling great after only a few hours sleep). So if the titration results were skewed too low because I woke up prematurely, I still have hope of obtaining the great sleep I got that night by increasing the minimum pressure another notch (or two if needed). Sound reasonable to you?

Thanks!
John

_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): Titration, CPAP, AHI, auto

_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): Titration, CPAP, AHI, auto


User avatar
Snoredog
Posts: 6399
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 5:09 pm

Post by Snoredog » Tue May 29, 2007 12:56 pm

johntee wrote:
Hi Snoredog. It's finally starting to make some sense...
And the part of the puzzle that I think just fell into place for me is that (surprise, surprise!) I think my titration number is not correct...
They started me at a pressure of 5cm, and I slept without any events at all for about 3 hours. Then a couple Hypopneas hit and they bumped me to 7cm after the next one hit. The bump to 7cm woke me up for the rest of the night. But I felt GREAT after that 3-1/2 hours of sleep with no events.

So that's what I've been chasing, thinking the zero events is what I need to make me feel like that again. I realized today from looking at my Titration study and Baseline study, that the Hypopneas seem to hit me in REM (which I was not getting much of before CPAP). So when I hit the Hypopneas at the start of my second REM stage in the Titration study, that's pretty much when they woke me up by going to 7cm. I'm guessing that if I had continued to sleep, they would have seen the Hypopneas continue even at 7cm, and they would have titrated me higher (similar to the 8+, probably 9cm, that seems to be needed based on the Auto-M results).

Does that theory seem sound? And not inconsistent with what you see on my charts?
That theory at least lets me stop feeling like I'm chasing the buggers further and further away from my titration results (which had left me feeling great after only a few hours sleep). So if the titration results were skewed too low because I woke up prematurely, I still have hope of obtaining the great sleep I got that night by increasing the minimum pressure another notch (or two if needed). Sound reasonable to you?

Thanks!
John
they start everyone out at 5cm, that is not unique. If it was 3hours before they seen you reach REM that would be on your PSG report as latency to REM, should show something like 180 minutes. If SDB events prevented you from reaching REM that latency to REM should shorten when you get home or go on CPAP.

You can spot those REM periods easily on your reports. If CPAP allows you to reach REM you should have clusters every 60-90 minutes, then you may have from 1 to 5 periods during the night. For example, looking at your last posted chart, those periods you highlighted in yellow are most likely periods of REM sleep. REM is where you are also more likely to experience SDB events because you are fully relaxed during those periods than others.

missed your titration? That can easily happen, you are only there in the lab for 1 night. You can have good nights and bad ones.

someday science will catch up to what I'm saying...

johntee
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:36 pm

Post by johntee » Tue May 29, 2007 1:08 pm

Snoredog wrote:If it was 3hours before they seen you reach REM that would be on your PSG report as latency to REM, should show something like 180 minutes. If SDB events prevented you from reaching REM that latency to REM should shorten when you get home or go on CPAP.
Yep, that's exactly right. My REM Latency without treatment was 244 minutes (4 hours!), and I only had 2 REM cycles(total of 30 minutes, 9.2%) in 5.5 hours of sleep. So my sleep architecture was all messed up.

In the Titration study, REM Latency was only 85 minutes. I still only had 2 REM stages (because they woke me up with the pressure bump), but that also totaled 31 minutes (12%), in only about 4 hours of sleep.

The first REM stage in my Titration study looks like it was less than 15 minutes long, so I'm guessing I wasn't really relaxed enough for more than 5cm to be needed. The subsequent REM seems to be where I was relaxed enough to need a higher pressure. (If my "theory" is to hold water...)


NarcoApneac
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Eugene, OR

Post by NarcoApneac » Tue May 29, 2007 1:16 pm

So that's what I've been chasing, thinking the zero events is what I need to make me feel like that again.
There you go! One could drive him/herself crazy chasing the elusive zero. Not everyone will be able to obtain an average AHI of 0.2 or less. By careful experimentation, just try to get the best results you can, and practice good sleep hygiene, eat well, exercise appropriately, and do whatever you know makes you feel better.


johntee
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:36 pm

Sweet spot -- Encore Pro Analyzer chart

Post by johntee » Tue May 29, 2007 1:32 pm

I got the Encore Pro Analyzer (thanks JSkinner!), and here is the AHI vs Pressure chart --
I'm guessing that I haven't overshot the mark at all, huh? The highest Minimum Pressure I've used is 8cm (to 13 Max). Do you think I should switch to 9 Minimum? Or 10cm?

Image