richart wrote:I have been reading about the SleepyHead data, but frankly I am more confused than ever. The program presents a huge amount of data. Can someone help me with this sample of charts and tell me what is going on? I can't seem to get my AHI down to 5 or below.
You might want to go through the Pugsy's Pointers thread that's at the top of the Stickies to learn all about the data presented in SH.
In looking at the data you do present, there's an obvious concern: The large number of CAs being recorded each night. Your CAI is by far the largest piece of the overall AHI on most of these nights the CAI > 5.0 all by itself. It's also significant that your CAI increased after you increased the pressure from 12cm to 13cm. These two things are enough to warrant caution in assuming that you need additional pressure to bring your AHI down below 5.0. CAs occur when the airway is already clear (not blocked) and additional pressure does not prevent them. Moreover, about 10-15% of new PAPers develop problems with
pressure-induced central apneas, which means that the CPAP pressure itself can cause CAs to occur. In this case, more pressure often causes more CAs to occur.
Now the thing is, it can be tough to figure out whether the CAs in data like yours are
real CAs that would be scored on an in-lab sleep test or whether they're wakeful breathing that is being mis-scored as CAs, which would not be scored on an in-labe sleep test because they actually occurred when you were awake.
On two of the nights at 13cm, there are a lot of breaks in the Flow Rate curve that appear to indicate you woke up and turned the machine off and back on. How sound do you think you were sleeping between those wakes? And how sound do you think you were sleeping on the night of March 12 (the night with the highest CAI and highest AHI)?
Here's what I would do if this data were my data:
1) I'd lower the pressure back down to 12 cm to see whether the number of CAs decreases.
2) I'd recheck the diagnostic and titration sleep study reports to see whether CAs were mentioned on either of them. If I didn't have copies of the sleep study reports, I would start the process of getting them for my records.
3) If I was pretty sure I was asleep during most of the times the CAs are being scored, I'd let my sleep doc know that my AHI is consistently running above 5.0 and that CAs make up a large chunk of the events. If the doc suggeseted or authorized that pressure increase from 12 to 13cm, I'd be sure to tell him that the number of CAs has grown with the pressure increase and that at 13cm the CAI is often above 5.0 all by itself.
4) If CAs ARE mentioned on the sleep study reports, I would insist on having a follow-up in-person meeting with the sleep doc (not a PA or nurse practitioner) to ask specifically what his/her opinion is concerning the CAs being recorded by the machine: The probability that the CAs in your nightly data are real goes up if CAs are reported as a problem on either of the sleep study reports.
I don't want to sound too alarming about the CAs: While 10-15% of new PAPers develop some problems with pressure-induced CAs, the CAs in many of those PAPers will go away with time. In other words, your sleep doc may recommend watchful waiting as a first response to seeing this kind of data. If the number of CAs starts to drop in 3-4 weeks, then most likely they're a self-limiting problem that won't be a long term issue. If the number of CAs continues to be this large (or continues to increase) after 3-4 weeks AND you're pretty sure you are actually asleep when the CAs are being recorded, then the next step may be a recommendation for a change of machine and a titration for the new machine.