Somnolence wrote:I'm considering making an FAQ of sorts now that I am using this treatment, and I hope to become more familiar with the community's concerns. I have learned quite a bit about the research and feel it would be helpful to share.
The CO2 re-breathing research citations have made the rounds on this board, which begs the question of why more of you haven't considered it further... I'd like to know those reasons.
Here is a link to one such study:
http://www.sleepmedicineusa.com/UserFil ... (EERS).pdf
I use this and have found it very useful, indeed, in my case a life saver.
I believe it is under used for several reasons:
Almost everyone who uses or administers CPAP therapy is unaware of the issues involved with the pressure induced ventilatory instability and how it is related to stress and carbon dioxide maintenance. So they do not understand how maintaining carbon dioxide can help stabilize the issue. They do not see how the ventilatory instability steals their sleep with it's associated respiratory related arousals. They do not understand how carbon dioxide works as an essential circulation regulating element which if lacking drastically reduces circulation, especially in the brain[1] where many of the breathing related chemoreceptors are. They do not understand how the lack of carbon dioxide also further frustrates metabolism. They do not understand how the repeated arousals caused by the resultant unstable breathing ratchet up the stress hormones making the cycles (hypoxic/hyperoxic – hypercapnic/Hypocapnic) deeper and likely resulting in inflammation and/or rostral fluid shift bringing about apnea or hypopneas and more cycles. In other words they are simply ignorant of the physiology issues which are directly related to normal CPAP use.
While they worry about their cells starving from too little oxygen in the blood they remain unaware of the cells which starve from the very low circulation and oxygen transport resulting from too little carbon dioxide in the blood. In the brain circulation resorts to a “rob Peter to keep Paul going” mode[1]. So what happens to Peter?
Since this is a simple and very economical fix, those who would produce very expensive “fixes” - well – they do not want to see this. They will suppress dollars and support for further research. They will attack those who support it. I would not be surprised to see this thread attacked by industry Internet shills.
I look forward to seeing you FAQ!
[1]: Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation
- Philip N. Ainslie and James Duffin
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296:R1473-R1495, 2009. First published 11 February 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.91008.2008
link: Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation
Philip N. Ainslie and James Duffin
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296:R1473-R1495, 2009. First published 11 February 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.91008.2008
link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?ter ... reactivity