LSAT wrote:I think it's ok to describe your personal experience with a procedure, but not ok to encourage others to try something that may harm them.
I'm not encouraging other people to experiment on themselves. I asked what reservations people have about pursuing it. By "pursuing," I meant legitimately seeing a doctor to evaluate candidacy.
Other than that...I agree with mollete.
XPAP is infamous for low compliance. People primarily consider sleep studies in light of health complaints. They then proceed to treatment for sleep apnea as efforts to address those complaints. Many are quick to blame the unsavory nature of the treatment as cause for lack of compliance. However, that begs the question of why people don't find the treatment compelling enough to tolerate its downsides. There may be something intrinsically lacking in the standard treatment.
It's also the reason why several prominent, Harvard affiliated doctors are investigating this. One of those avenues is through CO2 rebreathing.
None of that helps if your airway is collapsed. I stop breathing ONLY because the muscles have let go.
The goal of your sleep/titration studies is to maintain the airway. If your airway is still collapsing with treatment, then that treatment is not completely effective. Considering CO2 rebreathing beyond establishing effective therapy for the obstructive component seems premature, barring serious underlying complexity.