This evening, I went and read the card with Rescan - and found some interesting numbers their - nothing like what the Insurance is claiming - in Rescan, in the review data screen, with the viewing range 30-day complaince period, between the dates of 4/3/2012 (when she got the machine) and 5/2/2012 she used the machine a total of 29 days, 25 of those where over 4-hours a night - and they gave a % of days used over 4 hrs. a night at 83%!! -- a lot different than the 61% the insurance is claiming. If i am reading this wrong - someone please tell me now, so I sound like a fool when I go and start making phone calls tomorrow.

They gave us a bunch of forms and stuff to fill out to file an appeal, basically they are wanting details of why she did not wear the mask like she was supposed to, and if her reason is good enough - they will pay for it - the only issue is, she did wear the mask enough - something got messed up someplace - we just need to figure out what happened, and get the right numbers to someone.
Not sure how that all works though - we took the card into the DME for them to do the download (took them almost 1 1/2 months to get the card back to us) - and then I would assume they reported that data to the insurance Co - so need to get this figure out before they decide they want their machine back - at least to the point where the Insurance Co will pay for things, and then the DME is getting the machine back anyway - and going to see about getting her an S9 autoset - something that we can some data out of, and that involves going to a different DME - but for now, just need get the number right.
Anyone know the best way on how to make this happen without a big hassle with it?
Scott