I understand what you're saying, but I don't agree. A "sleep" doctor could be an excellent diagnostician, excellent clinician, and be very well informed about all kinds of modern xpap machines, without ever having looked into the history of CPAP development and without knowing who Dr. Colin Sullivan (inventor of "cpap") is. I don't think being aware of Dr. Sullivan's name (or the early history of "CPAP") is any kind of indication about whether a doctor should be prescribing CPAP therapy.moresleep wrote:Doctors who prescribe Cpap machines should know the name Sullivan. The other names may or may not be important; but, if a sleep doctor doesn't even know that basics about the history of the Cpap machine and its development, he/she shouldn't be prescribing Cpap therapy.
I'd like to think that any doctor interested in adding "sleep" as a side specialty was interested enough in the subject to have looked into how cpap was invented. But more important to me would be that a "sleep doctor" be interested in educating himself thoroughly about diagnosing and treating Sleep Disordered Breathing today. And that he continue to study new information regarding all forms of sleep disordered breathing, and understand what every type of xpap machine is designed to be used for, could be used for, shouldn't be used for....and what the settings do on all modern xpap machines. That's a lot to ask of busy doctors. I'd also want the doctor to understand the importance of using cream of the crop, very experienced, very good RPSGT sleep techs for the sleep center's PSG studies.
I couldn't care less whether a sleep doctor recognized the name, "Dr. Sullivan." One that's as interested in educating himself/herself about sleep medicine as I described probably would, but recognition of that name would not be any kind of litmus test as far as I'm concerned.
Now, that, I agree with. Absolutely.moresleep wrote:As one doctor (not a sleep doctor) told me, the continuing eduction of most doctors consists mainly of reading the materials that accompany the free samples sent them by the drug companies. Probably not far from the truth, alas.
Sad, but probably very true of most doctors.