robysue wrote:My apnea is moderate (and on the mild side of moderate). And during my diagnostic study, there were no o2 desats. My main problem was with "hypopneas with arousal" (RERAs), not apneas or hypopneas with desaturations on the diagnostic study.
ozij wrote:Robysue,
ResMed's don't respond to hypopneas, be they S8 hyponpnea, or by they S9 hypopneas. So the scoring of those is not really relevant to the quality of therapy you are getting. Resmed's do respond - aggressively - to flow limitations, but those have to happen in order of the machine to respond to them.
Somehow, it does not make sense to me to leave a person who has many respiratory effort related arousals at a miminal pressure that lets those happen. I would say that both your APAP experience at home and your BIPAP titration hint that your minimum pressure should be 7.8 at least.
My personal experience with the S9 makes me think its response to flow limitations (of which I have many) is different from the S8's, in that that S8 would raise pressure and stay there for 20 minutes. The S9 -- if I'm reading my charts correctly -- drops back down far sooner. You may be setting yourself up for repeated arousals by leaving your minimum too low.
If it were me, at this point, and until I had a bi-level machine to try, I would try to run the S9 at a fixed pressure of 7.8 (or 8), and an EPR of 2. That's almost like a bi-level with IPAP=7.8 (or 8) and EPAP=5.8 (or 6).
O.
DHC wrote:What markers/events do you consider credible as indicative of a "respiratory effort related arousal"?ozij wrote:Somehow, it does not make sense to me to leave a person who has many respiratory effort related arousals at a miminal pressure that lets those happen.
What I consider is really irrelevant -- it's what the PSG and robysue report. robysue reports having had many respiratory effort related arousals (RERA's) on her PSG.robysue wrote:My apnea is moderate (and on the mild side of moderate). And during my diagnostic study, there were no o2 desats. My main problem was with "hypopneas with arousal" (RERAs), not apneas or hypopneas with desaturations on the diagnostic study.
Of course. For any algorithm on any machine, there are people who are not well treated by that alogrithm. It is quite possible that the S9 auto algorithm cannot give robysue the type of therapy she needs. If your low flow periods cause arousals, and the S9 algorithm is not responding to them, robysue, then that automatic algrithm in not good for you.DHC wrote:In robysue's case - where her PSG indicated that her fundamental problem is "hypopneas with arousal" - and since, as you have pointed out previously, the S9 algorithm does NOT respond to hypopneas, do you consider the possibility that the ResMed algorithm just may not be the one best-suited for robysue's particular condition?
True again. Higher pressures can be intolerable.quoting ozij and commenting DHC wrote:>>My personal experience with the S9 makes me think its response to flow limitations (of which I have many) is different from the S8's, in that that S8 would raise pressure and stay there for 20 minutes. The S9 -- if I'm reading my charts correctly -- drops back down far sooner. You may be setting yourself up for repeated arousale be leaving your minimum too low.<<
For many people, and robysue stated similarly upthread, higher pressures are problematic.
If robysue cannot tolerate the pressure that will keep her from having RERA's then she is in trouble. And your question, robysue, about when CPAP may cause more sleep disruption than your OSAH syndrome is valid (not that I have a reply...).
The doc seems to think IPAP=8 EPAP=6 may solve the problem... based on 17 minutes of sleep.
True again. Which is why I suggested the following:DHC wrote:Further, rapid changes in pressure are contributors to arousals. In that respect, the S9 may be creating more arousals with either/both rapid pressure increases/decreases. It seems so in my experience with the S9.
Did you notice the word fixed in the above suggestion?ozij wrote:If it were me, at this point, and until I had a bi-level machine to try, I would try to run the S9 at a fixed pressure of 7.8 (or 8), and an EPR of 2. That's almost like a bi-level with IPAP=7.8 (or 8) and EPAP=5.8 (or 6).
Do you agree, DHC, that this may be one way of having therapy at pressure lower than the intolerable 9, higher that a minimun of 7, and avoiding the arousals caused by changing pressures?
Do you agree that EPR=2 at fixed pressure may give robysue a rather consistent EPAP of 6?
Do you agree that is worth trying while waiting for a Respironics BIPAP?