Of course it worked. Through grit and determination, he starved himself. Even a vegetarian diet, which is by definition high carb, can be made to work if you eat few enough calories, but it takes an iron will to do that.gvz wrote:Thanks LoQ. I'll have to re-read that a few times to let it sink in. Well, I have watched a co-worker literally lose 100 lbs the past year. No stomach surgery. He just switched to a strict veggie diet, reasonable portions, and hit the exercise hard. Seems to have worked for him -- whatever he was (or wasn't) eating... Of course everybody is different.
Here's a great example for those of you who watch TV. Watch Biggest Loser and watch Survivor. On TBL, people are sweating in the gym, and being told that they need to eat more food in order to lose weight. They do lose weight, but even when they get to 200 pounds a 5 pound weight loss in one week is HUGE.
On Survivor, people mostly lay around all day, with a few hours of intense exercise in the week, not like on TBL where the exercise is every day for long periods. And they all lose enormous amounts of weight on Survivor. On Survivor, they eat next to nothing. Last season, the guy called "coach" lost 22 pounds in 21 days or something like that. And he was skinny to begin with. That's 7 pounds a week. Most of the people on TBL would be thrilled to be losing 7 pounds a week, and they have way more to lose so should be, theoretically, easier for them to lose weight.
It's probably a complex answer as to why Survivor is a better weight-loss tool than TBL, but at least a part of it is the starvation diet and way less exercise.