Question for S9 data users
Re: Question for S9 data users
Come on, you guys are better than that. This is about helping and sharing, not gauging egos.
_________________
Mask: Swift™ FX Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear |
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
Additional Comments: ResScan v3.10, Contec CMS50-F wrist oximeter |
Gerry in Florida
Re: Question for S9 data users
Just thought I would "share"...
the unrelenting, frustrating Progressive Skew has arrived again for my third S9.
This after 4 days and 8th mask session. No matter what has been tried/ not tried.
And the thing is... if ResMed is correct that the bug resides in ResScan Software itself...
then everyone has the Skew that uses the software... not just a few (some?) (many?)...no... all.
Nothing to do but format... again, I guess.
Nord
the unrelenting, frustrating Progressive Skew has arrived again for my third S9.
This after 4 days and 8th mask session. No matter what has been tried/ not tried.
And the thing is... if ResMed is correct that the bug resides in ResScan Software itself...
then everyone has the Skew that uses the software... not just a few (some?) (many?)...no... all.
Nothing to do but format... again, I guess.
Nord
- alterego61
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:11 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Question for S9 data users
Not necessarily - the issue could be dependent on the software and hardware environment on the PC that is running ResScan.Nord wrote: And the thing is... if ResMed is correct that the bug resides in ResScan Software itself...
then everyone has the Skew that uses the software... not just a few (some?) (many?)...no... all.
_________________
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
Additional Comments: APAP 5-7, EPR 1, ClimateLine Hose, ClimateControl Auto 27C/80F, ResScan 3.10 / Win7 64, 16GB SanDisk Ultra Class 4 (15MB/s) SD Card |
- alterego61
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 10:11 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Question for S9 data users
To Bill Bolton: I'm with gpk, please focus on sharing and helping. That being said, I can't leave what you said go without comment.
Why don't you just lay off Nord and stick to making a positive contribution that will be helpful to others? Obviously I can't speak for others but I suspect that most people are not that interested in what Bill Bolton thinks is good policy, but they may be interested in what you have to say about your personal experiences with CPAP, your knowledge of different machines etc.
I don't believe Nord is trying to bait you, he's just getting annoyed with you. I am too and I hope you will get back to making positive contributions and stop trying to lay down the law.
Thanks Bill, it's great that we have you here to protect us from reading someone else's opinion. Not.billbolton wrote:I've have (sic) certainly posted when I see an unsupportable assertion..... such as the one above.... which have been appearing all too frequently in these threads.
Who appointed you as the arbiter of good policy Bill? That's just such a pompous thing to say. In any case, "fast and loose with facts", "all too frequently"...what are you talking about? Where are your facts?billbolton wrote: Playing fast and loose with facts under the guise of "opinion" is never a good policy.
Why don't you just lay off Nord and stick to making a positive contribution that will be helpful to others? Obviously I can't speak for others but I suspect that most people are not that interested in what Bill Bolton thinks is good policy, but they may be interested in what you have to say about your personal experiences with CPAP, your knowledge of different machines etc.
...they might be Bill, if they were helpful. But you frequently seem to be just criticising or correcting other people. Although you appear quite knowledgeable you rarely seem to have anything positive or helpful to say, you seem more interested in a) trying to prove that you are right and b) using unneccessarily florid language and extraneous annoying punctuation to make yourself look "smart" . That's just my opinion, subjective and unsupported. Others may feel differently etc.billbolton wrote: To-the-point comments on specific issues are quite appropriate in discussion, whether you happen to like them or not.
I don't agree with everything that Nord said or the way he said it but I really think that ad hominem is an inaccurate characterisation. As an example, if I asserted that Bill Bolton is wrong because he writes in a pompous pedantic way that winds up other people, that would be an ad hominem attack. I think it's more a case of Bill Bolton is wrong and he writes in a pompous pedantic way that winds up other people. That is personal and subjective, but it is not ad hominem.billbolton wrote: Long ad hominum attacks (etc) are the things that are clearly about baiting people
I don't believe Nord is trying to bait you, he's just getting annoyed with you. I am too and I hope you will get back to making positive contributions and stop trying to lay down the law.
_________________
Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
Additional Comments: APAP 5-7, EPR 1, ClimateLine Hose, ClimateControl Auto 27C/80F, ResScan 3.10 / Win7 64, 16GB SanDisk Ultra Class 4 (15MB/s) SD Card |
Re: Question for S9 data users
Poor Bill tends to get uncontrollably upset should anyone make a comment about Resmed that doesn't meet his approval. Really.billbolton wrote:I can't speak for anyone else but I've have certainly posted when I see an unsupportable assertion..... such as the one above.... which have been appearing all too frequently in these threads.Nord wrote:Almost every thread posted about the S9 and any problem related to it, you and billbolton have posted to defend the reputation of the S9 for some unstated reason.
Playing fast and loose with facts under the guise of "opinion" is never a good policy.
To-the-point comments on specific issues are quite appropriate in discussion, whether you happen to like them or not.Nord wrote:leads me to believe that this practise of short, argumentative comments is more about baiting people
Long ad hominum attacks (etc) are the things that are clearly about baiting people
Really he doesn't do the Resmed brand any justice. Really.
Really?? I thought it was JUST me. Really.Nord wrote:Very obviously... billbolton is always in charge of the "facts"... just ask him.And again he doesn't point to any "facts"... just his own unsupported assertions that he has the only good opinions; the only good policy and the only good facts.Really?? I thought it was JUST me. Really.
Very obviously... when billbolton doesn't believe it... then people are just baiting you. Talk about self righteous, self centered, bloated opinion.
Look in the mirror and pinch yourself... nobody takes you as seriously as you take yourself.
Cheers (don't take this the wrong way)
Nord
I third that!! Really??alterego61 wrote: Thanks Bill, it's great that we have you here to protect us from reading someone else's opinion. Not.
Who appointed you as the arbiter of good policy Bill? That's just such a pompous thing to say. In any case, "fast and loose with facts", "all too frequently"...what are you talking about? Where are your facts?
Why don't you just lay off Nord and stick to making a positive contribution that will be helpful to others? Obviously I can't speak for others but I suspect that most people are not that interested in what Bill Bolton thinks is good policy,
You Can't Fix Stupid Really