Thanks for the article, I'll work on digesting it over night.
Although one caution I see is that the article was written in 2015, and I've no idea if the Airsense 11 used the S-10 algorithms. (but for sake of discussion lets say that S-10 algorithm is employed in the Airsense 11)
Are you in agreement that the "cough" (apparently represented by the Inspiration/exhalation at 23:16:52) is real and not an artifact?
So my thought is that the "cough" (being a unusually large volume as well as peak flow) potentially influences the detection of the subsequent hypopnea. So, how can that be? This is what I'm thinking: if that "cough" breath is a major contributer to the RMS average that is the used to compare for the purposes of detecting a %age reduction, that single breath has an outsized influence.
Think of it this way, if the root mean squared average used for the comparison were measured over a 60 second interval, that one "cough" breath would have minimal impact on the % reduction. On the other hand if the root mean squared average used for comparison is over a 20 second interval, that one "cough" breath has a much greater impact on the percent reduction. What we don't know is what time period constitutes the baseline or comparison value being used.
Unfortunately the article that you shared doesn't really clarify that. The article does say:
A moving short time period (eg, one breath or 2 seconds) can be compared to a moving longer period (eg, 5 minutes) to evaluate for apnea or hypopnea.Citation18
.
I'll have to see if citation #18 is more specific.
Lastly, there was another thing that caught me eye:
Peak flow can be a poor measure of breath volume, which can lead to over- or underestimation of an apnea or hypopnea.
I've seen other discussions among members on the Cpaptalk forum that have insisted that the "peak" flow is what counts, not the volume of air.