Is EPR best avoided?

General Discussion on any topic relating to CPAP and/or Sleep Apnea.
User avatar
Goofproof
Posts: 16087
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:16 pm
Location: Central Indiana, USA

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Goofproof » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:15 pm

Jay Aitchsee wrote:
Uncle_Bob wrote:EPR is a comfort feature. Not all xPAP machines even have it. I've would personally question my doctor if he wrote out an Rx with an EPR setting unless he could specifically explain to me why I needed one following a titration study. People here on the forums will will be telling you what to do with your standard pressure setting(s) if you use EPR until they are blue in the face.

Getting off ramp and EPR is a sign of xPAP therapy maturity without having to juggle around with your pressure

Good luck
~UB
Bob, I think you're way off base, here. I have 9 years of therapy maturity and I have concluded that an EPR of 3 yields the most effective therapy for me! On the other hand, I don't believe it would for everyone.
I started 12 yeats ago, 2 months after a quad by-pass, with a pressure of 15 cm, c-flex 3, NO RAMP, with 2 L of O2. Sure it was painful, took 3 weeks to normalize. O2 levels 90 to 92. Stopped O2 add in 6 months later, O2 levels still 90 to 92 same.

9 years in I set the C-Flex to 1, in a effort to build up lung strength (more effort) it may have helped now my O2 levels reach 95 and drop to 92 at rest, I use 3L of O2 bleed into my CPAP, no HH installed, took it off year 10! Still using my CPAP! Jim
Use data to optimize your xPAP treatment!

"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire

User avatar
Pugsy
Posts: 64184
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:31 am
Location: Missouri, USA

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Pugsy » Mon Mar 27, 2017 9:29 pm

palerider wrote:this one's thick as a brick. :shaking head:
I give up.
Image
People see what they want to see no matter what is in front of them.
Sometimes Mark did us no favors including information like this that hasn't been thoroughly vetted and there's no way to vet it with Respironics equipment since Encore has elected to not show 2 different pressures. It's not worth worrying about but I will still correct people when they say that the setting of 3 will give them 3 cm reduction because it can't. Then they can believe whatever they want to believe...I don't care. Respironics manual documentation takes precedence over Mark's Beta software calculations that haven't been vetted.

_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.

If you want to try the Eclipse mask and want a special promo code to get a little off the price...send me a private message.

User avatar
jtravel
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:45 am
Location: Tucson,AZ

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by jtravel » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:15 pm

Pugsy wrote:
palerider wrote:this one's thick as a brick. :shaking head:
I give up.
Image
People see what they want to see no matter what is in front of them.
Sometimes Mark did us no favors including information like this that hasn't been thoroughly vetted and there's no way to vet it with Respironics equipment since Encore has elected to not show 2 different pressures. It's not worth worrying about but I will still correct people when they say that the setting of 3 will give them 3 cm reduction because it can't. Then they can believe whatever they want to believe...I don't care. Respironics manual documentation takes precedence over Mark's Beta software calculations that haven't been vetted.
Wow, Sorry to upset you like this, not my intention at all. I have always appreciated your help and dedication.
to be fair I never said a Aflex setting of 2 gives you 3 cm reduction.
I just stated that my data showed more than 2 cm and I wanted to understand why.
I want to learn and data plus documentation as well as expert opinion all combine to make that possible.
the sum total of the Respironics manual documentation and graph you posted about Aflex sure seems to indicate that at the beginning of exhalation it can in fact drop more than 2 Cm and it's only at the end of Exhalation that the max of 2 Cm limit comes into play.
That is what i read in the Documentation and have correlated with sleepyhead data.
You obviously disagree and that is fine,peace

_________________
MachineMask
Additional Comments: Apap 10-15 EPR setting of 3

User avatar
Pugsy
Posts: 64184
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:31 am
Location: Missouri, USA

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Pugsy » Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:45 pm

jtravel wrote:This would explain why my sleepy head data shows more than 2 cm difference.
No. More likely SleepyHead is wrong in what it is showing.
jtravel wrote:the sum total of the Respironics manual documentation and graph you posted about Aflex sure seems to indicate that at the beginning of exhalation it can in fact drop more than 2 Cm and it's only at the end of Exhalation that the max of 2 Cm limit comes into play.
No where on the graph does it mention cm...the numbers are all related to the level of Flex chosen. There's no mention of cm on the graph...only the explanation item #3 that I circled mentions cm and it says "by reaching the end of exhalation no more than 2 cm below the high point of inhalation." I don't see cm noted anywhere on that graph. Are you thinking that the wave thing with 1,2 and 3 is cm drop...it isn't..that's just showing the Flex relief setting.

That means a the end of exhalation it can't be more than 2 cm below the high point of inhalation. 2 cm max reduction..pretty plain and simple.
jtravel wrote:That is what i read in the Documentation and have correlated with sleepyhead data.
You obviously disagree and that is fine,peace
You are assuming what you see reported in SH is what is happening. Ever think maybe SleepyHead might not have it right? This particular little tidbit of data is something Mark came up with and not verified by Respironics software because Respironics software doesn't report this data point at all. Maybe Mark didn't get the scale quite correct.

Believe what you want. Yes, I disagree and when you tell people they can get more than 2 cm reduction using Flex..I will come behind you and show the manual where it plainly says 2 cm max reduction.
The manual trumps SH.

_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.

If you want to try the Eclipse mask and want a special promo code to get a little off the price...send me a private message.

User avatar
jtravel
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 11:45 am
Location: Tucson,AZ

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by jtravel » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:33 pm

Pugsy wrote: Believe what you want. Yes, I disagree and when you tell people they can get more than 2 cm reduction using Flex..I will come behind you and show the manual where it plainly says 2 cm max reduction.
The manual trumps SH.
I actually i believe only what the manual shows.
The Manual says that at the END of Exhalation the max relief if 2 Cm. That is the steady state pressure at the end of the Exhalation cycle.
What The manual also says is at the beginning of Exhalation significant pressure relief is provided.
The Graph shows Therapy Pressure on one axis and time on the other. It shows the Line that starts with the Therapy Pressure and then has a note that states "Exhalation starts and pressure level decreases"
You are wrong when you say it does not show pressure drop.
The graph clearly shows that at the beginning of Exhalation the Pressure relief drop is greater based on number selected than the relief pressure at the end of Exhalation.
This is how Aflex works based on PR documentation that you provided.
All I'm saying is You can get more than 2 cm of pressure relief but only at the beginning of Exhalation and then it ramps up to the 2 CM max at the end of exhalation.
It's not a fixed amount of pressure like Remed machines provide.
PR instead smooths the transition from the end of Exhale to the end of inhale.
We will just have to agree to disagree and move on.

_________________
MachineMask
Additional Comments: Apap 10-15 EPR setting of 3

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 32300
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:43 pm
Location: Dallas(ish).

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by palerider » Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:44 pm

jtravel wrote:All I'm saying is ....
all I'm saying is you're a nutjob and talking out your ass... 'course, that's what you've always done.

_________________
Mask: Bleep DreamPort CPAP Mask Solution
Additional Comments: S9 VPAP Auto
Get OSCAR

Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.

prodigyplace
Posts: 1755
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2017 5:45 pm
Location: Central Virginia

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by prodigyplace » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:50 am

palerider wrote:
jtravel wrote:All I'm saying is ....
all I'm saying is you're a nutjob and talking out your ass... 'course, that's what you've always done.
Don't sugar coat it, they'll them what you really think.

_________________
Machine: AirSense 11 Autoset
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: ClimateLineAir Heated Tube & Sleepyhead software
Please visit our sponsor, CPAP.com at https://www.cpap.com/ for all your CPAP needs.

User avatar
Hannibal 2
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:46 am
Location: Derbyshire UK

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Hannibal 2 » Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:03 am

Geez! ....Just went off to sleep for a few hours, come back and all hell has broken loose!

So, last few nights I've maintained a minimum pressure of 9cm with EPR of 3. AHI went 4.9, 3.7, 2.7, 6.0 and 2.1. I couldn't say I felt much different on any of the following days, I have felt better and I have felt worse. Maybe 2 IS the magic number for me, or it's other variables at play, sleep hygiene etc.

Had another wasted journey to the hospital yesterday, re mask review, long story short he measured me for an AirFit F20 and gave me a medium, I double checked it when I got home and I clearly need a large! I think he didn't have a large so just palmed me off with the wrong size! Shocking!

_________________
Mask: ResMed AirFit F30i Full Face CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: Air 10 ClimateLineAir, SleepyHead Software
"Welcome my son, welcome to the machine!
Where have you been? It's alright we know where you've been!"
(You've been in the pipeline...)

User avatar
Jay Aitchsee
Posts: 2936
Joined: Sun May 22, 2011 12:47 pm
Location: Southwest Florida

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Jay Aitchsee » Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:38 am

Jay Aitchsee wrote:Bob, I think you're way off base, here. I have 9 years of therapy maturity and I have concluded that an EPR of 3 yields the most effective therapy for me! On the other hand, I don't believe it would for everyone.
Uncle_Bob wrote:Good for you. I wonder if you are itching to try an EPR of 4, 5 or 6?
I would, as a matter of fact, but I don't have a bi-level machine.
Uncle_Bob wrote:My thinking was that I was prescribed Constant Positive Airway Pressure to keep my airway open (note NOT BiPAP). So why take away pressure on the exhale and increase the potential for my throat to collapse?
It's a little more complex than that, depending on the nature, type, and cause of the Sleep Disordered Breathing and type of machine one has. Generally speaking, EPR lowers the average pressure applied during therapy and, again generally speaking and in my opinion, the lower the pressure that needs to be applied to maintain effectiveness, the better. That is not to say that using EPR will always be more effective than not, but in some cases it might. Again, there are many factors involved.

_________________
Mask: AirFit™ P10 Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Headgear
Additional Comments: S9 Auto, P10 mask, P=7.0, EPR3, ResScan 5.3, SleepyHead V1.B2, Windows 10, ZEO, CMS50F, Infrared Video

Guest

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Guest » Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:49 am

At low pressures EPR may not be needed. At high pressures it can be the diff between being able to exhale or not - if you can't exhale you aren't blowing off your CO and will feel like you aren't getting enuff air = like you are suffocating. If your cpap doesn't allow for enuff EPR for you to breath then you need a diff cpap to have successful cpap therapy.

User avatar
palerider
Posts: 32300
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:43 pm
Location: Dallas(ish).

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by palerider » Tue Mar 28, 2017 9:57 am

Jay Aitchsee wrote:
Jay Aitchsee wrote:Bob, I think you're way off base,
. wrote:My thinking
"thinking"? is that what he calls it?

what would be the appropriate word to connote "swirling cesspit of ignorance and stupidity?'

_________________
Mask: Bleep DreamPort CPAP Mask Solution
Additional Comments: S9 VPAP Auto
Get OSCAR

Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.

Lucyhere
Posts: 1949
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 2:45 pm

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Lucyhere » Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:38 am

palerider wrote:
Jay Aitchsee wrote:
Jay Aitchsee wrote:Bob, I think you're way off base,
. wrote:My thinking
"thinking"? is that what he calls it?


what would be the appropriate word to connote "swirling cesspit of ignorance and stupidity?'

Oh yeah... the swirling cesspool of nasty, Paleface, is at it again. Anyone notice this kind of utter nasty in about every third thread? Oh darn... he won't even see this... I'm on his foe list.
Resmed AirSense 10 Autoset for her w/humid air/heated Humidifier
Bleep/P10

User avatar
DreamStalker
Posts: 7509
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:58 am
Location: Nowhere & Everywhere At Once

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by DreamStalker » Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:06 pm

Lucyhere wrote:
palerider wrote:
Jay Aitchsee wrote:
Jay Aitchsee wrote:Bob, I think you're way off base,
. wrote:My thinking
"thinking"? is that what he calls it?


what would be the appropriate word to connote "swirling cesspit of ignorance and stupidity?'

Oh yeah... the swirling cesspool of nasty, Paleface, is at it again. Anyone notice this kind of utter nasty in about every third thread? Oh darn... he won't even see this... I'm on his foe list.
Yeah ... but I did and that's all that matters.
President-pretender, J. Biden, said "the DNC has built the largest voter fraud organization in US history". Too bad they didn’t build the smartest voter fraud organization and got caught.

User avatar
Uncle_Bob
Posts: 2777
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:10 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Uncle_Bob » Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:52 pm

Jay Aitchsee wrote: It's a little more complex than that, depending on the nature, type, and cause of the Sleep Disordered Breathing and type of machine one has. Generally speaking
I was just referring to my own situation (words such as "I" and "my" etc) basic obstructive sleep apnea with prescribed CPAP.
Uncle_Bob wrote:Good for you. I wonder if you are itching to try an EPR of 4, 5 or 6?
Jay Aitchsee wrote:I would, as a matter of fact, but I don't have a bi-level machine.
To me that does not matter because a BiPAP is not the same as EPR. EPR is a limited bi level function, so you would not be comparing apples with apples. EPR uses a slower pressure change (more chance for an obstruction to occur ) whereas a BiPAP is a ventilatory device providing a faster response to expand and contract lung volume.

EPR also turns itself off during an apnea (which you possibly allowed to happen by turning ON EPR in the first place), in doing so its reacting to an apnea rather than preventing it. Not good.

User avatar
Pugsy
Posts: 64184
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 9:31 am
Location: Missouri, USA

Re: Is EPR best avoided?

Post by Pugsy » Tue Mar 28, 2017 3:14 pm

Uncle_Bob wrote: To me that does not matter because a BiPAP is not the same as EPR. EPR is a limited bi level function, so you would not be comparing apples with apples. EPR uses a slower pressure change (more chance for an obstruction to occur ) whereas a BiPAP is a ventilatory device providing a faster response to expand and contract lung volume.
Really now?
Okay, here's a little test for you.
Spot EPR here...EPR is 3 and PS from a bilevel device is set at 3. Using your rationale find the EPR flow rate.
And BTW not all bilevel devices work like ventilators. In fact most do not.


Image

_________________
Machine: AirCurve™ 10 VAuto BiLevel Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier
Additional Comments: Mask Bleep Eclipse https://bleepsleep.com/the-eclipse/
I may have to RISE but I refuse to SHINE.

If you want to try the Eclipse mask and want a special promo code to get a little off the price...send me a private message.