I hope the discussion isn't closed. "Anecdoctal evidence" such as a poll can be unreliable. An accuracy rate of 63% would indeed result in a clear affirmative, for example. Then there is "sample bias", i.e. the people taking the trouble to vote here on a CPAP forum may not be representative of the e...

You are a quite highly sophisticated user of the Zeo data. For someone who just uses a Zeo out of the box as instructed I'm not sure at all of its usefulness. I've read a few comments on various forums by people agonizing over their Zeo data. They may be agonizing over nothing. 64% is just too close...

"Accuracy", yes, thank you. It doesn't completely break 64% of the time. In the same video they say that an EEG channel on the forehead can't always be used to distinguish between REM and wake. This seems to me like a serious problem with their core technology that can't be overcome by analytical me...

Has anyone had problems with their Zeo's not being accurate.... See the Zeo company's own "Behind the Headband" Youtube series (http://bit.ly/OMoGVa). According to their own stats the Zeo is only 64% reliable. The details... they claim that polysomnographs (PSG) are only 85% reliable. They further ...