##(DSM) Thanks.rested gal wrote:If Deborah's is low (440 for that night), mine is too -- and I don't have any health problems (other than mild OSA and mild PLMD.)dsm wrote:Re your main chart, I notice again a lowish Av Tidal Volume.
For over a week on an S8 VPAP Auto 25, my 95th% tidal volume was: 400, 340, 340, 380, 340, 380, 340, 340, 360, etc. The mean was almost always 300, occasionally 320, and as low as 260 one night.
Of course, tidal volumes that seems to do ok for me aren't necessarily right for Deborah or someone else.
But anyway... "To each their own" -- tidal volume, among other things.
(DSM) ## Yes, good point (PS: I did go back over Deborah's past charts - a high that I found was 570 - low as best I recall was around this current number - so correlation ?).
Well, ummm, that is one of the many things NotMuffy is looking into ... and will be looking into further when Deborah is able to get the NPSG raw data he requested.dsm wrote: The CA's are obviously needing professional interpreting as they seem excessive.
##(DSM) Yes again & NM was the professional here I was thinking of.
NotMuffy wrote:there is also the preaforementioned issue of the breathing irregularity of phasic REM. And I think that as the REM-suppressant medication effect wears off in the latter part of the night, you have a pile of it (that might be an interesting thing to look for in your raw NPSG data).
You probably want to leave the variability of phasic REM alone (including centrals that are in there. They are generally considered to be normal phenomenon.)
DSM