A careful and honest reader would see that I quoted you precisely and asked which data point from an oscar report one would use. I then made no statement and merely asked for clarity as to which data point ine would use to determine “average needed minimum pressure “. YOUR words.palerider wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 3:16 pmWhat word did I use? "average", not Max, (which is what the 95% or 99% effectively is, so why do you make the leap to something completely different from what I said?lynninnj wrote: ↑Sat Aug 20, 2022 3:12 pmTo which I asked for clarity wrt your use of the term “average needed minimum pressure “. I am trying to determine which oscar provided data point would provide that value and listed those that were available.
Asking for clarity doesn’t equal a jump/conclusion.
A reasonable person would start with "average" if you weren't just trolling, which seems to be your modus operandi lately.
Without compelling evidence that you're not simply being a troll, I'm done with answering your questions about a months old post.
for someone who is such a stickler for nomenclature I am unsure why you don’t understand I am asking you specific question about some thing that you said.
Please don’t confuse my asking a question with being a troll. Trolling is what you do but that really wasn’t a gotcha question.
Perhaps you should read what you said again and then read my question. Maybe that will help you understand I’m asking you for clarification.
I seem to recall you asking many many many posters here to clarify what they mean by a particular term. Do you ask people for clarity because you were trolling them? This is more about you than it is me. If that is the case.