There are enough blatant falsehoods in this to expose it as total propaganda.
I don't have time or energy to address everything, but some examples:
All working Americans must submit proof of insurance or enter an "exchange." Exchange participants must submit their tax return, Social Security number, employer's tax ID, bank account information, address and telephone number. If one changes jobs and ends up pricing out of the government supplement, the government will want its money back. Either say goodbye to tax benefits or say hello to working as little as possible to remain eligible for assistance.
One needs proof of insurance (or a waiver) to avoid the tax/fine. For those using the exchange just to find insurance (not for the subsidy) there should be no complicated form. The Romneycare Exchange in MA only requires birthdate and zip code, not even a name, to get linked up. If you want a subsidy, of course, it gets more complicated; we'll find out how much more in a few weeks. The subsidy is based on the previous year's income, but then must be adjusted if the real income is higher. The change is mostly gradual, the only issue might be people right at the cutoff point.
Under the guise of efficiency and savings, physicians and patients are encouraged to get on the electronic medical record bandwagon. It creates a treasure trove of private medical information mined by government agencies that include the Department of Health and Human Services, IRS, and FBI. Can the NSA and CIA be far behind, if they aren't in the loop already?
Yes, of course the right wing would attack one of the few things that can actually create a significant saving, not to mention save lives. Recently I had a test where the doctor said, "Its probably nothing but we'll retest in six months to see if it changes," to which I said, "didn't I have that test last year (at a different facility)?" Unfortunately, they couldn't find the older test, so now I'm waiting to do the followup.
Employers will no longer be able to write off employee coverage as a business expense, making them more likely to drop coverage altogether.
False. For the most part this deduction is not changed. There is a small business tax credit that pays up to half of the health care costs for a small company (25 employees or under, average pay under $50K).
ObamaCare's "silver" plan will have a monthly premium, but individuals must also pay $2,000 out-of-pocket before the insurance kicks in. Imagine a minimum wage worker or family having to pay into the system while also owing $2,000 dollars annually just to access it. It will decrease participation by posing the difficult decision of seeing a doctor or paying bills.
More nonsense. The deductible is usually pointed to as a way to prevent people from "nickel-and-diming" the system. However, the silver plan is just the baseline used to establish the level of subsidy. People are free to chose other plans, and in fact can probably get a bronze plan with the same cost but lower deductible. For all of the "total socialist takeover" nonsense, the exchange is essentially the same as the offerings from a large company's employee plan: people are given a number of choices from local insurance companies, there will be (for some) a subsidy, beyond which they pay out of pocket.
EDIT: I forgot one important detail: Annual preventative care plus up to three doctor visits a year are exempt from the deductible. This makes the example given total bogus!