CPAPtalk.com

Julie wrote:But there's no indication of a new vote, just a confused note by a newbie who didn't understand that wknds have become 'resurrect old polls' time by scammers, spammers, etc. that have nothing new to add, and someone has to let them know. It's possible that spam, etc. posted earlier today was already deleted by a member, WWII didn't see it and wondered what happened.

How do you know that there was no new vote? Your post is VERY confusing!

Stop being difficult.

Julie wrote:Stop being difficult.

He's not being difficult. His point is valid.

Julie wrote:But there's no indication of a new vote, just a confused note by a newbie who didn't understand that wknds have become 'resurrect old polls' time by scammers, spammers, etc. that have nothing new to add, and someone has to let them know. It's possible that spam, etc. posted earlier today was already deleted by a member, WWII didn't see it and wondered what happened.

WW2 is no newbie. Confused (definitely) and addicted to the forum and playing games, but not a newbie. Just another identity of hers (in an ever-growing list).

Someone's deleting posts again:

LSAT wrote:

Worldwar2 wrote:I'm wondering why old threads that are of no help are brought to the top? I could understand if they contained information that would be helpful all these years later, but I doubt these fall into that category.

It's a poll.....any time someone finds a poll and votes...the poll becomes current.

Julie wrote:But there's no indication of a new vote, just a confused note by a newbie who didn't understand that wknds have become 'resurrect old polls' time by scammers, spammers, etc. that have nothing new to add, and someone has to let them know. It's possible that spam, etc. posted earlier today was already deleted by a member, WWII didn't see it and wondered what happened.

LSAT wrote:

Julie wrote:But there's no indication of a new vote, just a confused note by a newbie who didn't understand that wknds have become 'resurrect old polls' time by scammers, spammers, etc. that have nothing new to add, and someone has to let them know. It's possible that spam, etc. posted earlier today was already deleted by a member, WWII didn't see it and wondered what happened.

How do you know that there was no new vote? Your post is VERY confusing!

Julie wrote:Stop being difficult.

BleepingBeauty wrote:

Julie wrote:Stop being difficult.

He's not being difficult. His point is valid.

Julie wrote:But there's no indication of a new vote, just a confused note by a newbie who didn't understand that wknds have become 'resurrect old polls' time by scammers, spammers, etc. that have nothing new to add, and someone has to let them know. It's possible that spam, etc. posted earlier today was already deleted by a member, WWII didn't see it and wondered what happened.

WW2 is no newbie. Confused (definitely) and addicted to the forum and playing games, but not a newbie. Just another identity of hers (in an ever-growing list).

BleepingBeauty wrote:WW2 is no newbie. Confused (definitely) and addicted to the forum and playing games, but not a newbie. Just another identity of hers (in an ever-growing list).

I've spent a few minutes trying to decide who I really am. Someone said something like that the other day. So, please Bleeping, tell me who I am. And for God's sake, don't tell my wife and kids!

Worldwar2 wrote:

BleepingBeauty wrote:WW2 is no newbie. Confused (definitely) and addicted to the forum and playing games, but not a newbie. Just another identity of hers (in an ever-growing list).

I've spent a few minutes trying to decide who I really am. Someone said something like that the other day. So, please Bleeping, tell me who I am. And for God's sakes, don't tell my wife and kids!

Take a few more minutes, but don't hurt yourself.

You think you're clever, but you're so much like your "usual" user name that it's glaring. SSDD.

BleepingBeauty wrote:... and addicted to the forum and playing games,

You certainly are! All you have to do is glance at the number of your posts.

It would probably be a good idea if you would try and find a man (or woman) to keep you company; then your blathering wouldn't be so prevalent on this forum.

Worldwar2 wrote:

BleepingBeauty wrote:... and addicted to the forum and playing games,

You certainly are! All you have to do is glance at the number of your posts.

It would probably be a good idea if you would try and find a man (or woman) to keep you company; then your blathering wouldn't be so prevalent on this forum.

hmm, I wonder if it'd do any good to complain to the goodmans about people that make multiple accts just to stir up shit.

Worldwar2 wrote:

BleepingBeauty wrote:... and addicted to the forum and playing games,

You certainly are! All you have to do is glance at the number of your posts.

It would probably be a good idea if you would try and find a man (or woman) to keep you company; then your blathering wouldn't be so prevalent on this forum.

You're like a ghost in your transparency...

It's summertime. Get off your computer and go get a tan, demented old bat.

palerider wrote:hmm, I wonder if it'd do any good to complain to the goodmans about people that make multiple accts just to stir up shit.

Go for it! I think that's a great idea. I would definitely be interested in the response you would get.

Worldwar2 wrote:

palerider wrote:hmm, I wonder if it'd do any good to complain to the goodmans about people that make multiple accts just to stir up shit.

Go for it! I think that's a great idea. I would definitely be interested in the response you would get.

I'm waiting for the big bold words to appear at the bottom of the posts.

LSAT wrote:

Worldwar2 wrote:

palerider wrote:hmm, I wonder if it'd do any good to complain to the goodmans about people that make multiple accts just to stir up shit.

Go for it! I think that's a great idea. I would definitely be interested in the response you would get.

I'm waiting for the big bold words to appear at the bottom of the posts.

Nah, it's not PIN. AFAIK, she only had the one ID. As testy as she got, at least you knew where she stood. She didn't hide behind multiple IDs to say what she meant.

This one's admitted to having a few IDs here (and now there's at least one more) and comes off as sicky-sweet (and male with this ID ), but she's just as hypocritical as she ever was. For someone who claims to be 77, she plays games here like a teenager (and is still just as dull in her attempts to be insulting). *yawn*

BleepingBeauty wrote:This one's admitted to having a few IDs here (and now there's at least one more) and comes off as sicky-sweet (and male with this ID ), but she's just as hypocritical as she ever was. For someone who claims to be 77, she plays games here like a teenager (and is still just as dull in her attempts to be insulting). *yawn*

I'm so enjoying this and hope this person posts so that I can meet this "she", who is 77 years old. I'm 52. Anyone who is 77 and on a forum like this must be one hell of a person and extremely bright... with an IQ of at least 160. I admire her and think she must be one gutsy lady. What name(s) does she post under? I'd like to read some of her posts. You, on the other hand, appear to be a very lonely lady... try getting out of the house a bit and find some company.

Worldwar2 wrote: I'm so enjoying this and hope this person posts so that I can meet this "she", who is 77 years old. I'm 52. Anyone who is 77 and on a forum like this must be one hell of a person and extremely bright... with an IQ of at least 160. I admire her and think she must be one gutsy lady. What name(s) does she post under? I'd like to read some of her posts. You, on the other hand, appear to be a very lonely lady... try getting out of the house a bit and find some company.

Don't hurt yourself, ems.

BleepingBeauty wrote:Don't hurt yourself, ems.

Wow! Thank you, Bleeping. Very kind of you.