Re: Long-term cancer, etc. risks of CPAP?
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 4:44 pm
If you ever come down with a lung cancer or a bladder cancer it would most likely be because of long term smoking and not CPAP.
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
Its rare in Australia for someone to NOT have a landline. Its the only way we can get decent internet access. Allegedly Slovakia has faster broadband speeds than Australiachunkyfrog wrote:We eliminated our land line in the 80's. I can't believe people still have them!
The spam calls were enough to drive me bonkers.
Now if I get one, I permanently block the number, or hit reject if it is unlisted.
Sometimes I pick up, just to "tear them a new one" --just for giggles.
Well here is breast cancer in a 2500 year old "mummy" She was in hr 20'sThis gets a little tricker from my understanding. It isn't just any cancer that has been found but I believe prostate cancer.
Don't have to tell me about groundwater pollution. I grew up on a farm. Dad used chemicals, as did all of the neighbors. He turned to organics later. But now he and most of that generation of farmers are dead of varying forms of cancer... Unless something else got them first.Wulfman... wrote:And, I'm still wondering about the nuclear testing they did in the '40s, '50s and '60s (upper atmospheric), the nuclear waste dumps around the world, etc. Everything adds up. That stuff makes the "BPA" issue look like nothing.Pesser wrote:Studies are seldom what they appear. Often they are NOT from observed phenomena. Here’s an example how numbers can fool you:
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 25 feet = all dead
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 20 feet = all dead
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 18 feet = 9,100 dead
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 16 feet = 8,300 dead
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 16 feet = 7,300 dead
Now you have a formula to work with. If your standard deviation is within acceptable parameters you can form the basis of a linear relationship; you now can apply the above results as follows:
You take 10,000 people and drop them on a concrete floor from 1 inch = 10 dead
This is how you can form the basis of the dangers of plastics, sugar substitutes, cell phones radio waves, radio waves from outer space, radon, large cucumbers, apple skins, radiation from cement….
Then, there's groundwater pollution from pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers........ We could go on and on and on.
Den
.
Maybe they had a health lifestyle with lots of exercise. Heart disease is the biggest killer in the US. If you exercise and don't get heart disease, you're more likely to live long enough to die of cancer. Or working in the sun makes you more likely to get cancer. Or they all smoked a lot. Or maybe it was the farm chemicals. Maybe they listened to a lot of Country and Western music and that's the cause.cflame1 wrote:Wulfman... wrote:Don't have to tell me about groundwater pollution. I grew up on a farm. Dad used chemicals, as did all of the neighbors. He turned to organics later. But now he and most of that generation of farmers are dead of varying forms of cancer... Unless something else got them first.
But it's organic, of course it prevents cancer.archangle wrote:There's no evidence that organic food leads to a lower cancer rate.
Have you ever been exposed to secondhand smoke? Did anyone ever smoke in your house? In your workplace?Muffy16 wrote: (I have never smoked)
Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer in adults who have never smoked. Nonsmokers who are exposed to secondhand smoke at home or at work increase their risk of developing lung cancer by 20–30%. Secondhand smoke causes more than 7,300 lung cancer deaths among U.S. nonsmokers each year.
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statis ... /index.htm
Your point? We have conversations with people long gone all the time.Julie wrote:And you're replying to a 4 yr old poster who's long gone...
CapnLoki wrote:And how do you know the poster is a 4 year old child?