Page 4 of 12
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:32 pm
by chartle
OK I'm new here and I have to ask, was "A Mess" possibly a representative of So Clean? It appears that the account is deleted.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:44 pm
by Pugsy
chartle wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:32 pm
OK I'm new here and I have to ask, was "A Mess" possibly a representative of So Clean? It appears that the account is deleted.
The A Mess in this thread was posting as a guest..not logged in.
Her screen ID was AMess note no space between A and M
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83830
She wasn't a So Clean rep...not sure what she was really but she had some issues logging in often and losing her posts.
Lacking some computer skills maybe...never could seem to remember that A Mess and AMess were 2 different names and she had to use AMess if she wanted to be logged in. Long story there. Her account was never deleted and the only responses of hers that got deleted usually had some bad words in it.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:47 pm
by chunkyfrog
Sadly, the name she chose was too accurate.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 6:36 pm
by palerider
Pugsy wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:44 pm
chartle wrote: ↑Wed Mar 14, 2018 5:32 pm
OK I'm new here and I have to ask, was "A Mess" possibly a representative of So Clean? It appears that the account is deleted.
The A Mess in this thread was posting as a guest..not logged in.
Her screen ID was AMess note no space between A and M
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=83830
She wasn't a So Clean rep...not sure what she was really but she had some issues logging in often and losing her posts.
Lacking some computer skills maybe...never could seem to remember that A Mess and AMess were 2 different names and she had to use AMess if she wanted to be logged in. Long story there. Her account was never deleted and the only responses of hers that got deleted usually had some bad words in it.
The mess there was between the ears...
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 6:30 pm
by klv329
The neurologist today seemed knowledgeable in general but wondered about the so clean for the spouse....the humid breath running back into the tube, oh no what could be in there, the neuto-spouse never ever cleans it.
.......just a dry wind tunnel, no germs, neuro-spouse doesn't even use a humidifier.
...oh well, the unknown, what you can't see must be a boogie monster that needs something equally imaginary to make boogie monster go away.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:16 pm
by palerider
klv329 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 16, 2018 6:30 pm
The neurologist today seemed knowledgeable in general but wondered about the so clean for the spouse....the humid breath running back into the tube, oh no what could be in there, the neuto-spouse never ever cleans it.
.......just a dry wind tunnel, no germs, neuro-spouse doesn't even use a humidifier.
...oh well, the unknown, what you can't see must be a boogie monster that needs something equally imaginary to make boogie monster go away.
Plenty of words, but is there meaning?
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:30 pm
by chunkyfrog
PR, I do get the gist of what klv is saying.
Hoodoo does not really ever happen, so the only possible protection is more hoodoo.
Real problems require real solutions, neither of which is in Noclean's wheelhouse.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:48 pm
by palerider
chunkyfrog wrote: ↑Fri Mar 16, 2018 8:30 pm
PR, I do get the gist of what klv is saying.
Hoodoo does not really ever happen, so the only possible protection is more hoodoo.
Real problems require real solutions, neither of which is in Noclean's wheelhouse.
I kinda thought maybe so, but ... well, it's been a long day for that kinda deciphering.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 1:49 pm
by NEMarvin
Not an advocate of the SoClean by any means, and certainly am not paid for it, but came to this site among other things to find out more about people's experience. For those who say that it is a total waste, what do you make of the research posted on their site:
https://www.soclean.com/wp-content/uplo ... ct2017.pdf
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:04 pm
by jnk...
The only important info at their site is at the far bottom of the page:
And there you have it.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:12 pm
by palerider
NEMarvin wrote: ↑Tue Mar 20, 2018 1:49 pm
Not an advocate of the SoClean by any means, and certainly am not paid for it, but came to this site among other things to find out more about people's experience. For those who say that it is a total waste, what do you make of the research posted on their site:
https://www.soclean.com/wp-content/uplo ... ct2017.pdf
Enterococcus faecalis was completely inactivated on all filter papers subjected to the sanitizing process
I think that if I'm gonna put contaminated filter papers in my mask, that it could work.
However, I'm not putting filter papers in my mask (which will be much easier to decontaminate), and there's nothing in there that needs sanitizing in the first place.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:16 pm
by Okie bipap
If they wanted to prove how effective, or necessary it is, they should take a mask and hose that has been recently used, swab the inside of the mask and hose, run their machine and do a follow up swab of the mask and hose.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:19 pm
by jnk...
Okie bipap wrote: ↑Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:16 pm
If they wanted to prove how effective, or necessary it is . . .
It is my personal believe that their wanting to accomplish the impossible would not make accomplishing the impossible any more likely than it already is.
Re: SoClean?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 2:47 pm
by Goofproof
Proves to me like us, germs die of old age too. Lysol Spray kills 99 % of germs, and doesn't cost %300.00 or run on Electric. Jim
Is this SoClean 2.0?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 3:48 pm
by hobbs