Re: Five pieces of scamware to watch out for
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 6:29 pm
<----- Offers Chunkyfrog a soda.
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
look it up, i'm busy educating my kids.GumbyCT wrote:Some can't handle a place with no rules.Uncle_Bob wrote:There are no hard rules.
Only etiquette.
Most people replace the divots, some don't.
So who is to say what is right or wrong?
By etiquette do you mean not treating others the way they treat you? Or Submitting to their wishes?
GumbyCT wrote:Kindly show me the rule or just mind your own business.ems wrote:Simply put, if the "rule" here is to put OT before anything that does not pertain to sleep apnea, then type OT! What's the big deal??
Is the game making up rules?ems wrote:It's hard to believe that grown up people play such games. Good ole junior high.
Single file folks.... no pushing.GumbyCT wrote:I made the mistake of making two assumptions -
1. I thought we were a group of mature adults
2. AND had the ability to reason.
Some count that as 3?
You can spank me IF you want
But...
Go to the end of the line...
or you shall get spanked
Maybe you should get professional help for that OCD? Just a thought.
Ok I found it. Excerpts are quoted - the link to the full post is below.Uncle_Bob wrote:look it up, i'm busy educating my kids.GumbyCT wrote:Some can't handle a place with no rules.Uncle_Bob wrote:There are no hard rules.
Only etiquette.
Most people replace the divots, some don't.
So who is to say what is right or wrong?
By etiquette do you mean not treating others the way they treat you? Or Submitting to their wishes?
johnnygoodman wrote:Some CPAPtalkers have been using the spam mechanism to delete posts from others members which they disagree with.
The full post can be found here - viewtopic.php?f=1&t=20895&p=179739#p179739johnnygoodman wrote:My approach to moderating cpaptalk is well known. Here's the basic rational:
Beware the person who wishes to legislate the morality and the behavior of his neighbor.
< munch munch munch >chunkyfrog wrote:(getting popcorn)
>this should be directed at those piling on gumby. is ot a big deal? give in here and the same clueless people will want categories tomorrow. give in again and the clueless will rule the worldidamtnboy wrote:Hey Gumby, sometimes there are principles in life that are worth arguing for, defending, fighting for, going to the mat for, etc., and in the process irritating, alienating, and angering others. And then sometimes there are principles, even though arguably correct, that are are of sufficiently low importance that the loss of goodwill in defending them, defending them is not wise nor worth it. The benefit gained by being right is far outweighed by the loss from angering those around you. We all occasionally have to realize that to, "Win the battle but lose the war," isn't smart. Whether or not one should, or must, use OT falls in this category, IMO.
why is it the only time you see xyz is when he is trolling troubles for someone?xyz wrote:g:
> If you didn't know this is OT but opened it anyway then don't blame me.
The first line of his post is a "* you if you don't like it" statement.
The Alzheimer's must be in full force today. It's time to take away the computer.
mz:
> This is troll behavior.
It's more than that. It's an * saying that the rules don't apply to him.
g:
> A tip on computer use clearly has something to do with forum use
By that lame logic buying a computer at Best Buy is forum-related since you need a computer to access the forum.
ems:
> if the "rule" here is to put OT before anything that does not pertain to sleep apnea, then type OT!
> What's the big deal?
People with huge egos often believe that rules are for "the little people" and don't apply to them.
Actually, there was a news report this week from a university saying _exactly_ that.
lrt:
> so you do know that your _race track fire_ and this should be marked OT.
Correct, he didn't mark the race track fire post as OT either.
Waiting for a "race track fires have something to do with forum use" post.
The sad part is that people who are new to this forum see the OT stuff and don't return.
They are, after all, looking for _medical_ advice.
Do the math.
About a gazillion websites for/about computer usage.
Few websites for OSA.
And none as good as this one.
the poll results from last year linked aboveVader wrote:I know I put OT on all of my Off topic posts, but a number of others here don't. What's the big deal?
Why all the piling on Gumby? I don't see people getting this irritated with others who neglect this supposed "rule".
Besides, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out what's off topic, and what isn't.
>no rules but lets all gang up on gumbyGumbyCT wrote:Some can't handle a place with no rules.Uncle_Bob wrote:There are no hard rules.
Only etiquette.
Most people replace the divots, some don't.
So who is to say what is right or wrong?
By etiquette do you mean not treating others the way they treat you? Or Submitting to their wishes?
(why do I feel like someone will start a poll about whether OT posts must be marked OT)
in typical gang pile on behavior ems wrote]GumbyCT wrote:It was actually the 2nd clue.xyz wrote:v:
> Why all the piling on Gumby?
Because the _first line_ of his post was an in-your-face, * you.
He's about ready for the nursing home.
In case you haven't read what I posted it was intended to actually "HELP Others" - not inflame which is all I've seen you do.
>but after reading some people dont like it now i want to make a mountain out of a molehill. how niceems wrote:I didn't think about if this was OT or not... the subject line just caught my eye and I opened it.
Simply put, if the "rule" here is to put OT before anything that does not pertain to sleep apnea, then type OT! What's the big deal??
>adults? with the ability to process thoughts and determine if something they want to read is in front of them? shurley you jestGumbyCT wrote:Is the game making up rules?ems wrote:It's hard to believe that grown up people play such games. Good ole junior high.
Or deleting someones post cuz YOU don't agree with it?
I will admit I made two mistakes -Single file folks.... no pushing.GumbyCT wrote:I made the mistake of making two assumptions -
1. I thought we were a group of mature adults
2. AND had the ability to reason.
Some count that as 3?
You can spank me IF you want
But...
Go to the end of the line...
or you shall get spanked
Maybe you should get professional help for that OCD? Just a thought.
LittleRedTruck wrote:How's the popcorn this morning ? Dan
Otter wrote:Y'all must spend a fortune on troll chow.
>looking for the rest of the gangLittleRedTruck wrote:So, so you do know that your race track fire and this should be marked O T. But, then of course, this consideration is for others, not you! Gumby !
>lostLittleRedTruck wrote:Bump
>the pinnacleMary Z wrote:If you are too lazy to follow convention and write Off Topic at the beginning of an off topic post.....
and then blame others who fell for your scam thinking you might have something valuable to say, well I think it's just a sad commentary on your respect and consideration of other forum members.
This is troll behavior.
>marking this in case someone decides to legislatejohnnygoodman wrote:My approach to moderating cpaptalk is well known. Here's the basic rational:
Beware the person who wishes to legislate the morality and the behavior of his neighbor.
Not going to legislate ... you might have a valid point.Guest wrote:>the pinnacle>marking this in case someone decides to legislatejohnnygoodman wrote:My approach to moderating cpaptalk is well known. Here's the basic rational:
Beware the person who wishes to legislate the morality and the behavior of his neighbor.
I'm not sure why you posted anonymously. I learned something here today. It also points out why I'm so freakin' scared of some of our candidates for super Tuesday.Guest wrote: >the pinnaclejohnnygoodman wrote:My approach to moderating cpaptalk is well known. Here's the basic rational:
Beware the person who wishes to legislate the morality and the behavior of his neighbor.
wondering what you learned somethingDreamDiver wrote:I'm not sure why you posted anonymously. I learned something here today. It also points out why I'm so freakin' scared of some of our candidates for super Tuesday.Guest wrote: >the pinnaclejohnnygoodman wrote:My approach to moderating cpaptalk is well known. Here's the basic rational:
Beware the person who wishes to legislate the morality and the behavior of his neighbor.