Re: 12 years on cpap and it's time to move on.
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 1:17 am
I wasn't referring to your questions Nate but to the sarcastic response from that goof person!
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
Steier-- that's split_city's pal!NateS wrote:Looks like they are doing it here with just a nightly stick-on patch on the outside of your neck. No surgery!
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1gMVtX1o ... ewsletters

Would that be classified as a disarticulated oxymoron or a simple contradiction?debtheveg wrote:You're a very judgmental lot.
Note to self: Pick up a flank steak at the market today.deltadave wrote:
While at first glimpse this would appear to be the dawn of a New Era of Dial Wingin', keep in mind that if you electrocute your hypoglossal nerve(s), you end up talking funny, swallowing funnier, and OSA progresses to completely obstructed airway.deltadave wrote:Sears got stuff for $28.95!
So it does time travel also?corky on Tue [color=#FF0000]Mar 13[/color], 2012 7:33 pm wrote:
Turned on March 20th. Over night sleep study @ M.U.S.C. I will let everyone know more as things unfold. Thanks deb.
You have no idea what your current numbers are? You have no idea what your numbers were when you were on CPAP? Then how did you know CPAP treatment failed?corky wrote:I don't have those numbers. Sorry
I'll bet he wasn't told there was a non-invasive bilateral solution in process that worked as well, or better, either.Drowsy Dancer wrote:You have no idea what your current numbers are? You have no idea what your numbers were when you were on CPAP? Then how did you know CPAP treatment failed?corky wrote:I don't have those numbers. Sorry
Nor was he obliged to post here, either.debtheveg wrote:I'm not sure why Corky is obliged to tell anybody, anything! He simply has told us he's dumped the cpap and is in the trials for the new implant device. Simple! Why the need to grill him about every detail? He and the doctors have made the decision that, for whatever reason, he qualifies to partake ... end of story. He's under no obligation to elaborate on his own personal details and he shouldn't be judged for what he does or doesn't divulge.

Roles?Sleep2Die4 wrote:I am beginning to like the roles played by Corky and debtheveg.
How come it is Sooooo hard for you to understand that one of the functions of this board is the analysis of scientific changes with respect to the treatment of OSA? It is not just a cheer leading board?debtheveg wrote:Nor is anyone ... what's your point?
He, correctly, thought some of us may be interested in what he's been through and how he progresses.
Thank you, Corky!