Page 2 of 2

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:34 pm
by idamtnboy
ignorant1 wrote:
Goofproof said:
Question: is a "Don't Feed the Trolls" post a troll post or a spam post?
The answer is…. (insert buzzer sound) … Both! I’m trolling to build an audience not only to feed my pathetically shriveled ego and mitigate my deficit of human interaction, but I will also be back here soon to sell you a miracle product that cures all SDB problems. (I’m going to call is an Anti Suffication Valve, or ASV for short. ) It will be made in China from inferior quality and highly toxic materials, but it will cost only 28 cents! And if it does kill you, then you don’t have apnea anymore! It’s win-win.
Now, if only the grand conspiracists at Resmed, the FDA, and the CIA would stop trying to kill me to keep the secret safe. At least they still haven’t figured out a way to track me again – I made my tinfoil hat 6 layers thick this time!
Hey, you really do have a bit of a sense of humor, even if it is a bit morbid! I like it!

IMO, this forum runs pretty damn smooth, even with the occasional OT thread. There is a bit of vitriol at times, and an occasional just plain dumb comment, but all in all it is a clean civil exchange of experiences and opinions that touch on some of the most sensitive fabric of our lives, our health. One of the aspects I appreciate the most is that almost every poster refrains from using vulgar expletives. The language used in this forum is suitable for our children, both in words and tone.

The best response to both trolls and boring OT threads is the same, ignore them and don't respond. With the traffic on this board they will quickly fade into the past. When's the last time you, or any of us, bothered to peruse the topic list beyond 2 pages?

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:22 pm
by rocklin
.
ignorant1 wrote:Please Don’t Feed The Trolls.
Jamiswolf wrote: Why not use the Foe option so those posts don't bother you?
ignorant1 wrote:And miss the slow-motion train wreck?


This guy goes to a psychiatrist and says, "Doc, my brother's crazy; he thinks he's a chicken."

And the doctor says, "Well, why don't you turn him in?"

The guy says, "I would, but I need the eggs."




.

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:09 pm
by SleepingUgly
rocklin wrote:.
ignorant1 wrote:Please Don’t Feed The Trolls.
Jamiswolf wrote: Why not use the Foe option so those posts don't bother you?
ignorant1 wrote:And miss the slow-motion train wreck?


This guy goes to a psychiatrist and says, "Doc, my brother's crazy; he thinks he's a chicken."

And the doctor says, "Well, why don't you turn him in?"

The guy says, "I would, but I need the eggs."




.
Nice analogy, Chicken!

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:03 pm
by rocklin
SleepingUgly wrote:Nice analogy, Chicken!
Thank you, Even Bigger Chicken.


Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:06 pm
by osmium sleeper
I thought this was a thread about oral sex and apnea.

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:24 pm
by SleepingUgly
osmium sleeper wrote:I thought this was a thread about oral sex and apnea.
Do you have something serious to say about oral sex and apnea? If so, you can start a thread about it. If you are only going to crack jokes, the thread should be labeled "OT". If someone else starts a serious, non-OT thread about oral sex and apnea, you should only make serious remarks in their thread. Please look deep within yourself and ask yourself whether you have something serious to say about oral sex and apnea. DO YOU??

After much introspection, I've personally decided that I will NEVER, EVER as long as I live have anything serious to say about oral sex and apnea. In fact, if someone else starts a serious thread about it, anything I might say in that thread may on the surface appear serious, but on the inside I will be laughing my @$$ off. So I'm going to try not to respond at all to any threads like that. On the other hand, after even more introspection, I've concluded that I'm somewhat verbally unrestrained (at least when it comes to typing), so I'm not sure how much luck I'll have not responding. In conclusion, if you do have something serious to say about oral sex and apnea, could you keep it to yourself so that I am not tempted to respond? Thanks so much.

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:36 pm
by osmium sleeper
SleepingUgly wrote: In conclusion, if you do have something serious to say about oral sex and apnea, could you keep it to yourself so that I am not tempted to respond? Thanks so much.


Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 8:55 pm
by SleepingUgly
rocklin wrote:
SleepingUgly wrote:Nice analogy, Chicken!
Thank you, Even Bigger Chicken.
You're welcome, Woody Allen.

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:14 am
by roc@different_puter
SleepingUgly wrote:
Please look deep within yourself and ask yourself whether you have something serious to say about oral sex and apnea.

DO YOU??
You are such a top!



.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.

Well, shoot, if you insist.

.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.

I figure one possible cause of sdb is the Vaginal Model.

You know how when ladies age, they get "loose" down there, especially if they aren't sexually active.

And they can "tighten up" the pubococcygeus with Kegel exercises, including a specially built dildo to contract against.

Image

.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.

What does a long-time didgeridoo player, and a great deep-throating fellatrix have in common?

Great contractive muscle tone in their larynx.

.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
.

My guess is, just like a "soft vagina" larynx muscles loosen with age.

Add the usual suspects of sleep apnea: sleeping position, weight gain, alcholol, etc., etc.

And there you have it.

My own little theory connecting didgeridoo and didgeridong.

.

Re: A call for (in)action

Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:56 am
by osmium sleeper
Here we go again. Thanks, Rocklin!