ameriken wrote:a viable and winnable VP, instead of dumba** Palin...
my fear is the GOP is once again going to put in another unwinnable candidate . . . (God forbid)....Palin .
Palin
talks like a right-wing ditz, but she
walks like a left-wing John Wane.
In Alaska, Palin bravely fought the states systemic corruption.
She sided with Democrats to put a huge tax on the oil conglomerates, who previous controlled Alaska like a marionette.
As a result, when most states are in dire deficits, Alaska has a surplus of 12 billion dollars.
From The Atlantic Magazine, a decidedly
liberal publication:
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Tragedy of Sarah Palin
"Palin’s achievement was to pull Alaska out of a dire, corrupt, enduring systemic crisis and return it to fiscal health and prosperity when many people believed that such a thing was impossible.
She did this not by hewing to any ideological extreme but by setting a pragmatic course, applying a rigorous practicality to a set of problems that had seemed impervious to solution.
She challenged supposedly inviolable political precepts, and embraced more-nuanced realities: Republicans sometimes must confront powerful business interests; to govern effectively, you have to cooperate with the other side; you sometimes must raise taxes to balance a budget; and doing these things can actually enhance rather than destroy your career, whatever anybody says."
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
"What if history had written a different ending?
What if she had tried to do for the nation what she did for Alaska? The possibility is tantalizing and not hard to imagine.
The week after the Republican convention, Lehman Brothers collapsed, and the whole economy suddenly seemed poised to go down with it.
Palin might have been the torchbearer of reform, a role that would have come naturally.
Everything about her—the aggressiveness, the gift for articulating resentments, her record and even her old allies in Alaska—would once more have been channeled against a foe worth pursuing.
Palin, not Obama, might ultimately have come to represent “Change We Can Believe In.”
What had he done that could possibly compare with how she had faced down special interests in Alaska? "
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The full article here:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/arc ... in/8492/2/
Mike