BrianinTN wrote:Muffy: I'm going to ask a probably-stupid question because even after reading everything written here, I'm still pretty confused on one point. What is it that you would advise Paper_Nanny to be doing with her pressure and backup rate settings, both "now" to provide a consistent and not-dial-winged data set for her doctor...
Putting myself in her shoes and looking at her data, I don't know what those defaults would or should be...
Muffy does not participate in "dial wingin'" for a host of reasons, including, but not limited to, if she is, in fact, a "trained professional" (something that I don't see her ever having admitted to being), then she cannot do "E&M"; and frequently, if not the majority of the time, important information that would have a significant effect on treatment management is missing.
This is a perfect example:
MSD and my neurologist both concluded that drug effect was not an issue.
However, in response to your question, she should be on what the physician wants her on. At The Peak of the Madness, should she have given that DL to the physician, he would have had no choice but to say "See, ITYS, now do what I say for another month and then we'll see what happens."
That said, 3 treatment approaches have been suggested.
BrianinTN wrote:she seems to have had both qualitatively and quantitatively poor sleep (even relative to her diagnostic PSG) with the latest assortment of constant pressure and constant bilevel pressure winging.
Actually, other than the awakenings, her diagnostic PSG looks quite good, with the exception of Sleep Efficiency (although Split_City would call it normal, but his lab is in his garage).
However, maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism, that could fall under the "missing or inaccurate information" as well:
- The absence of SWS (the sleep, not the person) in a relatively young person is odd, especially when
- The continuity of NREM2 is incredible, if not incredulous; and
- The lack of commentary of Sleep Quality analysis does not necessarily mean that other abnormalities are not present (for example, I would expect a high liklihood of the presence of "alpha intrusion" in this scenario).
BrianinTN wrote:I wrote a paragraph summarizing her data, with a little thesis too, but I'm axing that for now.
Actually, I'd love to hear what you have to say.
OK, off to the beach!
Don't want to turn this day into "idle time"!
Edited to add "edited".