Re: low carb diet?
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 9:13 pm
Don't look for a diet, don't "go on a diet". Don't focus on your weight.
Try to learn about the way your body processes the food you eat.
Taubes is a person who loves and understands science who wrote about bad science in physics before he started investigating the science in public health.
Anyone can lose weight - that's how weight watchers make their millions. 95% of those who loose weight, on any diet, regain it.
It's not about loosing weight. It's about what makes us fat. And what makes us fat is the way the human body processes carbs. And it is only the carbs we eat that eventually become fat in our bodies. That's human metabolism.
Go to http://www.garytaubes.com for articles and presentations if you want to know about the subject.
Taubes' new book is "Why we get fat" - a must read for anyone who is thinking of doing something about their overweight.
Taubes' "Good Calories Bad Calories" - a 700 page thorough review of the science backing conventional wisdom about nutrition had me totally convinced - two years ago I changed my eating habits in order to eat in a more healthy way - I changed the way I eat - forever. Weight loss had nothing to with it.
I discovered - as others have - that I no longer craved sweets, no longer arrived jittery at meal, and feel generally better. Loosing weight was a side effect.
If you have a bad carb addiction, try to wean yourself off the carbs and sweets gradually. Don't think of weight and whether this will help you loose weight, focus helping your body be healthy, aim for getting rid of carbs. The craving for more and more carbs, that feeling of insatiable hunger is a physical, bodily issue, caused by the way the carbs [bread potatoes pasta and sweets] are metabolized.
And before someone pop up with the "calories in calories out" cliche, let me remind you that sugar is a type of calorie you would never consider putting in your car's gas tank in order to give the car more energy. You have to know your body's processing mechanism before you decide what to feed it.
Try to learn about the way your body processes the food you eat.
Taubes is a person who loves and understands science who wrote about bad science in physics before he started investigating the science in public health.
Anyone can lose weight - that's how weight watchers make their millions. 95% of those who loose weight, on any diet, regain it.
It's not about loosing weight. It's about what makes us fat. And what makes us fat is the way the human body processes carbs. And it is only the carbs we eat that eventually become fat in our bodies. That's human metabolism.
Go to http://www.garytaubes.com for articles and presentations if you want to know about the subject.
Taubes' new book is "Why we get fat" - a must read for anyone who is thinking of doing something about their overweight.
Taubes' "Good Calories Bad Calories" - a 700 page thorough review of the science backing conventional wisdom about nutrition had me totally convinced - two years ago I changed my eating habits in order to eat in a more healthy way - I changed the way I eat - forever. Weight loss had nothing to with it.
I discovered - as others have - that I no longer craved sweets, no longer arrived jittery at meal, and feel generally better. Loosing weight was a side effect.
If you have a bad carb addiction, try to wean yourself off the carbs and sweets gradually. Don't think of weight and whether this will help you loose weight, focus helping your body be healthy, aim for getting rid of carbs. The craving for more and more carbs, that feeling of insatiable hunger is a physical, bodily issue, caused by the way the carbs [bread potatoes pasta and sweets] are metabolized.
And before someone pop up with the "calories in calories out" cliche, let me remind you that sugar is a type of calorie you would never consider putting in your car's gas tank in order to give the car more energy. You have to know your body's processing mechanism before you decide what to feed it.
Well said, archangle.archangle wrote:
Sounds like a typical response from the medical mafia. If you bring up people who were helped by something, he'll tell you that that's anecdotal evidence and there are no controlled, double-blind, peer reviewed studies. Then he'll bring up unattributed anecdotal evidence against what he doesn't like.