archangle wrote: 1) A lightning strike is not measured in gallons like a flood. The idea that lightning strike destructiveness is equivalent to a flood is wrong.
A perfect lightning suppression system would be a zero resistance/impedance system going to ground. The voltage would be zero, so the power and energy in the suppression system would be zero as well…
2) The destructiveness of a power surge has nothing to do with the voltage between your device and the earth. It's the voltage spike between the hot, neutral, and earth connections in the plug your device is plugged into that your device "sees".
You are again saying you have some electrical knowledge. And yet have no idea how surges work. Why things are damaged. Quite obviously from your numbers, you never designed this stuff.
The river perfectly demonstrates how surges protection works. Surges are not voltages as you keep assuming. Surges are a current source. That means voltage increases as necessary so that current will flow – unobstructed even through a CPAP. If a surge is 5000 amps, voltage will increase as necessary so that 5000 amps flow. Nothing stops a surge. Nothing. Especially not a power strip protector. If a river does not have a downstream path, river height increases (just like voltage) so that the same gallons per minute still flow. If you do not understand these similarities, then you do not understand basic surge protection. And never learned why one ‘whole house’ protector is the best and only protection needed by a CPAP.
A perfect suppression system would be zero impedance to earth ground. Correct. And that is impossible. So we make wires shorter - not thicker – shorter to lower impedance. Wire length (as short as possible) is critical to surge protection as explained to roster. But again, you did not do this stuff. So you don't yet understand what is important. Why does every effective protector always have a separate and dedicated earth ground wire? Because a connection to earth must be so short. Otherwise the protector promotes itself by being grossly undersized. Ie that failure light.
Grounding an antenna does not increase chance of lightning strikes. Please learn from hams who do this stuff. Find various discussions by Bill Otten. He has probably done it all. Or the various discussions in rec.radio.amateur.antenna where your myth is routinely trounced. Or learn from the case study of a Nebraska radio station:
> Based on a belief that "too much" grounding was attracting lightning strikes, grounding
> connections on the tower's six sets of guy wires had been disconnected sometime in the
> past (Figure 4). This action may, in fact, have helped direct lightning discharge current
> down the antenna tower itself, bringing the strike closer to the studio/transmitter
> building.
You do not even know how MOVs work. How protectors are designed. You promoted the very popular lie about sacrificial protectors. And now claim that earthing can increase your chance of getting a lighting strike. Please sir. You are not doing what any responsible engineer I work with would ever do. You automatically believe hearsay. Explains why you do not understand surge protection and use grossly undersized power strip protectors.
A nearby lightning strike can cause inductive currents in nearby circuits that aren't even electrically connected to the house wiring system.
A lightning strike near a long wire antenna can create thousands of volts on that antenna. Then we earth it with an NE-2 neon glow lamp. A milliamp through that lamp reduces thousands of volts to tens of volts. Because induced energy of nearby lighting is near zero. That induce surge is promoted only when numbers are ignored.
A direct strike to a lightning rod meant tens of thousands of amps – the entire lightning bolt – flowing to earth on a wire. Four feet away from that wire was an IBM PC. The entire lightning current, according to you, must have vaporized the PC. Reality. The direct lightning strike only four feet from a PC that did not even blink. Please learn the numbers and technology before assuming so many myths. Nearby strikes (induced surges) do not cause damage. Direct strikes are why we earth surge protectors.
It's the voltage spike between the hot, neutral, and earth connections in the plug your device is plugged into that your device "sees".
Again you are confusing surges (massive currents) with voltages. A voltage spike between hot, neutral, etc is not destructive. Made irrelevant by protection already inside every appliance. Is even defined by numbers in international design standards.
A destructive surge is a current approaching on any or all of those wires. Destructive surges enter on all AC wires. And exist via some other wire, human body, or other conductive material such as wood or concrete. Once that energy is inside a building, it will find a destructive path to earth. Either a surge remains outside the building. Or no effective protection is possible. Only way to stop that current is to not stop it. To connect (divert, shunt, bond, switch) to earth before it enters a building. And that is done in every building that can never have damage - a 'whole house' protector.
Demonstrated in a 1994 IEEE paper by Martzloff, a protector too close to appliances can simply put that surge on all three wires. Gives a surge even more paths to find earth destructively via appliance. But again, I am citing professionals who did the research. Not making subjective claims from popular myths. Which is why a ’whole house’ protector is the best and only protection needed by a CPAP.
Meanwhile, the best and only protection needed for the CPAP (and everything else in the house) is one properly earthed ‘whole house’ protector.