Page 5 of 6
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:02 am
by jonquiljo
SleepTechulous wrote:In Kentucky: "You may beat your wife with a stick no thicker than the thickness of your thumb unless she consents to it."
You just know some BDSM loving woman put that last line in. "Unless... unless she permits it. Put that line in."
Don't you have some work to do tonight?
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:53 am
by SleepTechulous
jonquiljo wrote:SleepTechulous wrote:In Kentucky: "You may beat your wife with a stick no thicker than the thickness of your thumb unless she consents to it."
You just know some BDSM loving woman put that last line in. "Unless... unless she permits it. Put that line in."
Don't you have some work to do tonight?
Notmuffy deleted that post. Dontcha love responding to deleted posts? Hold on, I'll PM you with one of my other accounts.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:15 am
by nobody
TL;DR
Listen, people, stop feeding this troll and it will go away.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:25 am
by Sleepyhead22
nobody wrote:TL;DR
Listen, people, stop feeding this troll and it will go away.
People have been saying that for months and that guy is still here. At least I think that is him. I think it was a lot easier before he was banned because we knew that it was him. Now we have all of these people running around that may or may not be him, we have people getting upset because they are accused of being him and on top of that it gets harder everyday to know whether or not it really is him.
Then there are all of the post deletions. People saying that no one has the ability to delete posts and that he must be deleting his own posts to frame other people. But then we have other people getting their posts deleted, does that mean that they are him also? Because I don't think so. There are some people getting their posts deleted that I am pretty sure are not him. This used to be easier.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:58 pm
by xerort
you know what?
I'm done. Deleteing my posts, insulting me, have fun with that.
It's pretty ridiculous that I've had such a large following, for stating what is basic fact.
You don't need to see your download if you have a good doc/rt team. And it's funny, because people scream "If I didn't watch my downloads, then I would have blah blah blah!"
Exactly. You proved my point exactly. If your doc had or rt had been worth anything, then they would have listened to you.
I'm sorry that your doc sucks.
But I'm done trying to help.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:08 pm
by elena88
YOu could have done some good here, but your platform of " you dont need to see your download if..."
was not viable...
it was contrary, and you were condescending..
and you made a great many assumptions... which were false....
and if you think all of our doctors or dme's have the time, or inclination to figure out mysteries that take days, weeks, and months to
solve, you have been living in apnea treatment la la land..
you even have a name for us: "self setters..... " that speaks volumes about your agenda...
Did you think you were going to talk everyone out of self setting their machines here?
For what end? For what end?
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:40 pm
by xerort
As opposed to deleating my post, I'm just editing it. Doesn't muchly matter, it's going to be deleated.
Anyone who reads this, look at the time it was posted. It was posted at 8:45 pm est. Now, if you want proof I am not deleating it, look up my name and find when I last logged in. After I hit "submit" I am logging out. if I deleated my post, I would have to be logged in, right?
How much you want to bet that this one stays now that I've point it out.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:50 pm
by BrownEyes
EveryOne please......
Tuesday Nov, 2, 2010
Love You All, :hugs&kisses:
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:59 pm
by DoriC
Thanks for the reminder Brown Eyes. Anyone in the mood to start a discussion on the election? It might lighten the mood around here!
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:02 pm
by jonquiljo
DoriC wrote:Thanks for the reminder Brown Eyes. Anyone in the mood to start a discussion on the election? It might lighten the mood around here!
Vote early and vote often!
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:47 pm
by Junebug999
DoriC wrote:Thanks for the reminder Brown Eyes. Anyone in the mood to start a discussion on the election? It might lighten the mood around here!
HAHA -- Good one Dori -- yes we should all vote. It's getting pretty interesting out here in California. Whitman and Brown have really gone round after round.....I'll be glad when it's all over and we don't have to hear all the commercials on the radio again for a while.
And don't even get me started on the propositions.....bleah....it's hard to live here.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 7:54 pm
by Junebug999
xerort wrote:you know what?
I'm done. Deleteing my posts, insulting me, have fun with that.
It's pretty ridiculous that I've had such a large following, for stating what is basic fact.
You don't need to see your download if you have a good doc/rt team. And it's funny, because people scream "If I didn't watch my downloads, then I would have blah blah blah!"
Exactly. You proved my point exactly. If your doc had or rt had been worth anything, then they would have listened to you.
I'm sorry that your doc sucks.
But I'm done trying to help.
Ya know -- I was reading xerort's postings with an open mind...and not trying to prejudge, or have a negative opinion, etc....but my gut reaction (and I've learned to really trust my gut reactions) IS that there is something REALLY wrong with an attitude that would say "I'm sorry that your doc sucks.".......call me crazy, but there is something DAMNED familiar about this last post.
So, someone above said we should feed the troll -- we're just going to have to just not feed them, when they starve from lack of narcissistic (sp?) attention, they'll get bored and go troll somewhere else.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:34 pm
by Junebug999
listen child -- all this forum needs is some of these good people to be named as moderators, and they'll figure out a way to take you and all your twit, childlilke personas out with the morning trash every time you show up!
I was reading my first posts by trollers when you were probably running around in Barney underwear and IF you think for a second I care....you're SO also DeLUSIONal.
And......you and all your twit, childlike personas are now on permanent ignore by me...and hopefully anyone else....you are trolling for your narcissistic supply....so if you don't get it, you'll go troll somewhere else....
bye bye idiot!
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:57 pm
by SleepingUgly
I REALLY don't like the idea of Johnny or anyone on his staff having an active role in the forum in the form of moderators, frequent bans, deleted posts, etc. I personally do not want a Big Brother. I like it just fine the way it is. Better to take the bad with the good than to have that situation, IMO.
Re: In my defense.
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:24 pm
by robysue
I agree with SleepingUgly's last post.
Trolls such as calist make our lives a bit miserable if we let them do it.
But resorting to witch hunting in an effort to uncover every possible name a troll posts under and suggesting preemptive bans of users with few posts that disagree with the majority of posters makes us no better than the trolls.