Re: Requesting BASIC diet/weightloss advice and support
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:17 pm
As far as bread goes-theres lite whole wheat out there thats 7 carbs per sliceDreamStalker wrote:Good that you are staying monitored. I also hope you posted your comments about half-truths on that bolg site so that others reading it are made aware.Mindy2 wrote:DreamStalker wrote: Congrats on the significant weight loss. If I were you I would still continue to get your A1c test for another year or two and not just take your sergeon's word for it (I suppose you are already doing that).
Check out this blog that may be of interest to you. It has an entry about weight loss surgery and diabetes.
Hi there, DreamStalker!
Yes, I do still check glucose with finger stick every week and plan to continue haveing A1c checked every year (I'm cautious!)
Thanks for the link - very interesting. I have long been on a low carb diet and although it kept me from regaining, I was only able to lose about 5-10 lbs per year. Since I have a medical problem that was expected to result in end-stage disease within 5 years, I took the calculated risk of surgery. By NIH standards, I don't know of any doctors who would perform gastric bypass on someone with a BMI under 35 (and insurance wouldn't pay for it). In fact they won't do it for a BMI under 40 unless the person has one or more of a specific set of comorbidities that are serious.
Now about that link: it makes some valid points but there are also a number of half-truths and inaccuracies. For one, the author mixes info about traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the gastric band. I had the former and there are far fewer follow-on surgeries with this surgery than with gastric banding. This surgery has been around for a number of years and has a pretty good history. If one doesn't regain the weight (and yes, it can happen), then the type 2 diabetes is not known to come back. With gastric banding, type 2 diabetes reduction is more likely due to the weight loss resulting from the surgery. With Roux-en-Y, it's the duodenum/length of small intestine that results in a very rapid change. There are long-term registries and most if not all bariatric surgery practices insist that their patients return very year for a checkup. Also, since I work on cost-effectiveness analyses, I can say for sure that the info on pay-back is seriously flawed! Cost-effectiveness is commonly computed as cost of treatment divided by additional years of life adjusted for quality of life.
On another subject, MoneyGal -- carbs are sometimes referred to as "refined" (eg white flour) or "unrefined" (eg whole wheat flour) and are further defined as “good carbs” and “bad carbs”. We all need carbs as fuel – you’d get very tired without carbs. However, “bad carbs” will promote weight gain and poor health. “Bad carbs” included refined flour, all sodas, etc. Especially bad are things like high-fructose corn syrup. A small amount of regular sugar is usually not considered bad. All foods are made up of fat, protein and carbs. Fresh fruit has no fat and no protein and is made up of “good” carbs. Vegetables are generally in the same category but this does not include legumes (beans, lentils, split peas). Legumes have protein and carbs. Meat and eggs contain protein and fat.
On my 1200 calorie per day eating plan, I’m supposed to eat 60-80 grams of protein, 100-120 grams of “good” carbs and the rest fat.
Hope that helps a little.
Mindy2 (who is really Mindy)
I have to disagree with you on the good carbs bad carbs comments. If you read previous posts in this thread, I attempted to explain that all carbs become glucose once in the blood system and consequently are treated the same by the body regardless of whether they are refined or whole ("bad" or "good") ... at least as far as weight loss is concerned. For diabetics, refined vs. whole does make a difference but they too are better off eliminating them altogether. Basically the unrefined (whole) carbs enter the blood stream slower but nevertheless, the same amount of insulin is required to regulate the resulting blood sugar from an unrefined as a refined ... just the duration or time it take to regulate it is different. To burn fat out of storage, one has to keep total insulin "amount" down ... whether it occurs slowly or fast makes no difference ... it is the total amount that matters for fat loss. Therefore, for fat loss, ALL carbs are bad.
If however, you are not fat or have no desire to lose fat, then have your carbs and eat'em too.
Secondly, we do not need carbs. Our bodies are designed to make all necessary carb byproducts (like glucose and glycogen) from dietary protein. The only cells in the body that need blood sugar glucose are red blood cells ... all other cells of the body can burn ketones made from fats. Furthermore, most vegetables have small amounts of carbs that the body can use. So our bodies metabolize proteins into any extra needed sugar for our red blood cells and into any extra glycogen needs to replenish glycogen stores that is not provided from vegetables. In fact the body could survive on just meat and fat alone if it had to ... although it is not recommended since vegetables provide lots of other micro-nutrients essential for good health. In other words, carbs are not an essential nutrient as many have been led to believe by dietitians and nutritionists. Our bodies are designed to run on fat as a fuel source.
The reason some get a feeling of fatigue, headaches, and other bad symptoms when removing carbs from their diet is because they are experiencing withdrawal from the carb addiction. It only lasts a few days to a couple of weeks after first eliminating carbs from the diet ... until the body is able to adapt to burning fat again just like it is supposed to. Once the body has adapted to fat for energy, fatigue and bad symptoms go away ... at least until you reintroduce carbs and then you have to go back through the withdrawal period again if you want to get off carbs again.
@ MoneyGal ... what ozij says ... except stop bread too.