Re: Problems in Canada with Socialized Medicine?
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:23 pm
I think the best thing to do is not respond to any thing LINC has to write, I think he thrives on pushing peoples buttons much like a bored child.
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
I don't think that's overly fair to him. Linc is a traditional conservative who believes in success through hard work and self starting. I can fully understand that as I believe in that myself. Having said that, I do believe in the essence of our health care system here in Canada. I pay significant amounts of tax and a lot of that does go to healthcare. There was a time when I didn't make as much money as I do now. In that time, I had a severe bout with pneumonia (three days in hospital) and previous to that I had two hernias surgically repaired. My immediate cost was: zero dollars. Without that public healthcare paid for by my tax dollars, I would have been bankrupt. A previous poster said that the problem with socialism is that you sooner or later run out of other peoples money to spend. I like to believe that paying taxes for public services is part of the contract that free citizens have with an nominally democratic government. Anyone who thinks that we can do without that contract need only look at Somalia where there is no government. Yes, we can get into semantics over the definition of 'socialism', but that will never solve the problems faced by people who have no reliable healthcare and no court of last resort when they get really ill. Where a system like ours gets into trouble is when programs are set up to 'help' people pay for goods and services, are minimally audited, and companies take advantage of the lack of oversight to line their pockets and DON'T provide the required service to the people supposedly being assisted. A system like ours gets into deeper trouble when true socialists like the loony lefty Dippers get control of the public purse and start spending like there was no tomorrow. Unfortunately that's all a part of a much larger problem caused by people no longer demanding that governments be accountable to them, the voters. That rarely gets put back into order without bloodshed:-(dels wrote:I think the best thing to do is not respond to any thing LINC has to write, I think he thrives on pushing peoples buttons much like a bored child.
That's a matter for another thread; let's get this one back on topic....dels wrote:... As for FOX news, when 911 first occured, it was their staff who first started the rumors that the terrorists came in through Canada , and they surely never stopped any "Guest" from speaking in interviews by saying "actually they came in via the USA". not only that but there is pervassive coverage that Canada was a place to be feared because we let terrorsits in all the time...apparently. Those that followed that LINC quoted are those that followed many years after the origional statements that first appeared on FOX. Media on both sides have a responsibility to challenge peole who make blatently false statements.
And the nutty thing about that is that the current U.S. proposals don't resemble Canada's system in the slightest, so there really isn't much point in holding Canada up as a good example or a bad one. (By the way, thank you Canadian friends for putting up with this nonsense so patiently.) As of today's news, it looks like there won't even be a public option. We will end up (1) keeping private insurance, (2) imposing rules that make it easy to move from plan to plan without exclusion for pre-existing conditions, (3) requiring almost everyone to have insurance, and (4) subsidizing some people so they can. Today, we require (under EMTALA) that emergency departments accept patients regardless of ability to pay, and the federal government provides grants to hospitals that end up providing large amounts of unreimbursed care as a result. These grants come at the end of the year in an unpredictable amount, which plays havoc with planning, and the whole system skews medicine away from prevention and into crisis care. Let's get the uninsured into regular insurance programs so they get out of the emergency department and into normal office and clinic treatment, which is far more efficient, and reimburse providers in a normal way instead of block grants.dels wrote:It's actually not another topic, it was first brought up as an example on how the media and certain political leanings say things that are simply exadurated or untrue as a scare tactic. Right now the flavor of the month bashing Canada over health care and on the other side people using our system to say Americans should do things as we do. I think most people would prefere to be left out of the Americans debate .
It depends on what province you are in that determines the amount of help you get with CPAP, as an example. Here in Ontario, there is a program called the Assistive Devices Program. It covers about 75 percent of the cost of the machine up to a max of 1040.00; about 780.00. Your co-pay would be 260.00 (Figures are close, I may be off a few dollars on the split) When you get your scrip, you present it at your DME and they supply a basic mask and machine. The DME typically charges the max allowed by the government. (The 1040.00) They may not charge more than 1040 for a CPAP, but they will try to palm off whatever they can get away with. The machine they tried to palm off on me was an entry level CPAP with no exhalation relief and no data capability. I found that machine online for as little as 150.00 (refurb) to as much as 340.00. It isn't in production anymore. Not gonna get into it any deeper than that, but let it suffice that the owners of Medigas will have to be buried in graves dug with a corkscrew when they die of greed. This is what I was referring to when I say that there is insufficient oversight in the administration of the program. Some provinces have no assistance for buying a CPAP. Stuff is often 100+ percent more expensive in Canada because people don't know about their alternatives and basically take what they are given. And DMEs tell them the usual lies about importing their stuff. Competition in Canada is almost non-existent due a lack of native supply/suppliers, hence no competition, and the sheer size of the country vs population. Thank God for online suppliers...Kiralynx wrote:I have a question for our Canadian members participating in this thread.
So, could you explain (gently, and remembering that I'm still repaying my sleep debt!) how your system DOES work? Or point me to useful, factual, and non-biased (really!) reports on the subject?
Thanks!
The DME's are not part of the health care system anymore then the local pharmacy is and are cover by the same kind of rules. Some provinces cover drugs and medical equipment and some don't. So they bill "insurance companies" either the provinces health care or your insurance you may have from work - same as in the USA.Kiralynx wrote:I have a question for our Canadian members participating in this thread.
But I have also seen posts complaining about Canadian DMEs and the horrid prices they charge. (Gee, our systems aren't that different after all! Most DMEs under both systems are lunkheads!)
!
Ah, like Homeland Security? Starting a war against a country that had nothing to do with the reported reason for the war? In the 90s, our elected Congress undoing all the financial safeguards put in place following the great Depression enabling the chaos we're in now at the urging of those who see the taxpayers as their goose laying those golden eggs? Our Congress voting itself automatic salary increases while most of us have suffered losses of jobs or reduced wages? Our Congress exempting themselves from any proposed changes to healthcare...not that any money was paid them them as campaign contributions from the folks who wanna ensure there is no competition for insurance dollars?Terminator wrote:...loony lefty Dippers get control of the public purse and start spending like there was no tomorrow...
Others have answered well and I'll throw in my two cents. As mentioned the provinces decide how to spend their health care dollars. Primary care is covered, specialists etc are mostly all covered. Homecare is covered as it has been shown to be cheaper on the system and better for the patient to recover at home once it's safe to be sent home under nursing care. A homecare nurse will tend to a patient at home sometimes several times a day while medically necessary. While that seems like a luxury it is much cheaper than taking up space in a hospital and all that entails expense wise.Kiralynx wrote:I have a question for our Canadian members participating in this thread.
I have also heard quite a bit of the anti-Canadian system blather. (My parents are avid Fox news followers, so whenever I go over to sit with my Mom, I get an earful. Or three.)
I have seen you, the Canadians, saying "This is what I got under this circumstance, and it was great."
But I have also seen posts complaining about Canadian DMEs and the horrid prices they charge. (Gee, our systems aren't that different after all! Most DMEs under both systems are lunkheads!)
So, could you explain (gently, and remembering that I'm still repaying my sleep debt!) how your system DOES work? Or point me to useful, factual, and non-biased (really!) reports on the subject?
Thanks!