Page 4 of 4

Re: Did Your Titration Produce Normal Sleep and Breathing?

Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2017 12:44 pm
by TASmart
Somehow, I think that Barry Krakow, a renowned practitioner, author, MD and educator in the SBD realm is a better choice for information relating to sleep apnea than a mud singing name calling illogical xxyzx. I mean for Pete's sake, do you really believe you are experienced, skilled, and smart enough to criticize an international sleep apnea expert?

Re: Did Your Titration Produce Normal Sleep and Breathing?

Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2017 1:07 pm
by TASmart
Then you seriously need to improve the clarity of your writing. Your first post read like you were rolling on the floor laughing due to the process Krakow describes as optimal. As far the rest of your cut and pastes, you have no standing to say he is right or wrong, he is the expert, you are the grasshopper.

Re: Did Your Titration Produce Normal Sleep and Breathing?

Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2017 2:35 pm
by TASmart
xxyzx wrote:
TASmart wrote:Then you seriously need to improve the clarity of your writing. Your first post read like you were rolling on the floor laughing due to the process Krakow describes as optimal. As far the rest of your cut and pastes, you have no standing to say he is right or wrong, he is the expert, you are the grasshopper.
======

then you need to learn to read english

i agree with krakow

i have full standing to say what the facts say and make conclusions using logic

grasshopper was kungfus student
kungfu was my student
And you are wrong again. Kang was grasshopper when he was a child, as called by Master Po. There was not a character named kungfu. But this is trivial, except it goes to you frequent misrepresentations of fact, and not being able to discern facyt from fiction. Be well my friend, I am done correcting you. It's too easy and you are too large of a target.

Re: Did Your Titration Produce Normal Sleep and Breathing?

Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2017 3:11 pm
by Guest
xxyzx wrote:
TASmart wrote:
xxyzx wrote:
TASmart wrote:Then you seriously need to improve the clarity of your writing. Your first post read like you were rolling on the floor laughing due to the process Krakow describes as optimal. As far the rest of your cut and pastes, you have no standing to say he is right or wrong, he is the expert, you are the grasshopper.
======

then you need to learn to read english

i agree with krakow

i have full standing to say what the facts say and make conclusions using logic

grasshopper was kungfus student
kungfu was my student
And you are wrong again. Kang was grasshopper when he was a child, as called by Master Po. There was not a character named kungfu. But this is trivial, except it goes to you frequent misrepresentations of fact, and not being able to discern facyt from fiction. Be well my friend, I am done correcting you. It's too easy and you are too large of a target.
======

there was on my tv
sorry yours has static
LOBTURD,

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt"
Kung-Fu-Shits (multiple sources and variations, origin unknown)