Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2005 7:00 pm
Audio may be a little better, but not sure.
If I recall, he wasn't a good user of the microphone, often standing away from it, so you weren't likely to get as good an audio as with Rapoport. And some people just aren't as used to talking into the microphone. Also, that microphone setup seemed to result in more of an echo than Rapoport's. So don't worry about the quality of the Q&A session. It was the best you could have gotten. It was fine. Rapoport's lecture and answers were good quality, and that's what counts.
Linda
If I recall, he wasn't a good user of the microphone, often standing away from it, so you weren't likely to get as good an audio as with Rapoport. And some people just aren't as used to talking into the microphone. Also, that microphone setup seemed to result in more of an echo than Rapoport's. So don't worry about the quality of the Q&A session. It was the best you could have gotten. It was fine. Rapoport's lecture and answers were good quality, and that's what counts.
Linda