super7pilot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 12:10 pm
Seems it's some proprietary secret with Resmed as to what the reading on the oscar scale even means. Does a .25 FL mean that there is a 25% restriction. Does .50 mean a 50% restriction?
Nobody knows what the numbers on the flow limitation graph in Oscar mean
because Resmed hasn't published any units for the vertical scale of the flow limitation graph. Indeed, Resmed has made very little technical information about that graph
public. And it's important to remember that Oscar is the result of
sleep apnea patients programming their own program to read CPAP data. (The initial work was done by a (former) CPAPtalk member by the name of JediMark when he was frustrated with a whole bunch of things.) Resmed, PR, and other CPAP manufactures have never sanctioned any of the work done on the Oscar project, and none of the manufacturers have shared proprietary information with any of the Oscar programmers.
In ResScan, Resmed's own software for reading the data off a Resmed CPAP's SD card, there is a flow limitation graph, but instead of a numerical "scale" for the vertical axis, there are three icons: A very round inhalation icon that corresponds to 0.0 on the Oscar graph, a somewhat distorted inhalation icon that corresponds to 0.5 on the Oscar graph, and a very distorted inhalation icon with a flat top that corresponds to 1.0 on the Oscar graph. The Resmed documentation for interpreting the ResScan flow limitation graph essentially says that the higher the graph is, the more distorted the shape of the inhalations are. In other words, the vertical scale of the graph is about how
distorted the shape of the inhalations are rather than whether there is a measurable drop in air flow into the lungs during inhalation.
According to Resmed and various journal articles, the more distorted the shape of the inhalation part of the flow rate graph, the more likely it is that the upper airway is becoming unstable and hence the more at risk the upper airway is to collapsing enough to restrict the air flow enough to warrant flagging a hypopnea or an obstructive apnea. The only thing is, we have no idea what factors Resmed's algorithm is using to judge the degree of distortion in the shape of the inhalation part of the the flow rate graph, nor do we know what their weighting of those factors is. It's also apparent from what little documentation is out there, Resmed uses some kind of running "average" over the last several minutes of breathing when as part of the computation in how "distorted" the inhalation part of the flow rate graph appears to be.
Intuitively, based on the icons the ResScan software uses, we would expect a significant degree of flow limitation to be scored when the tops of the inhalations are flat and square shaped. In practice, however, if you scroll through a lot of flow rate graphs while simultaneously looking at the flow limitation graph, you see a lot of places where you're left scratching your head: Why was a flow limitation scored HERE, but not THERE? Why are these inhalations considered more "flow limited" than those inhalations, which look pretty much the same?
Then there's this fact: It's quite clear that in some people's data, flow limitations get scored when they're congested and the problem is not the upper airway, but the nose. And that kind of "flow limitation" isn't necessarily something that indicates the upper airway is at risk of collapse.
So if no one knows what the scale means, why does anyone even pay attention to it or make pressure adjustments on an unknown?
It is known that Resmed's Auto algorithm responds (and responds aggressively at times) to flow limitations. Indeed, activity in the flow limitation graph is responsible for the vast majority of pressure increases in many people's data. Once the machine is happy enough with the shape of the inhalations, it starts to decrease the pressure.
Since Resmed's AutoSet and VAuto increase the pressure when flow limitations are being scored, most people around here jump to the idea that flow limitations must be
bad. And since
some flow limitations get better with the increase in pressure, there are folks around here who kind of jump on the idea that eliminating as much activity from the flow limitation curve as possible will mean they are sleeping "better". And the way to attempt to eliminate or minimize flow limitations is to increase the
minimum pressure on an APAP or the
minimum EPAP on a VAuto (Resmed's bipap machine).
In addition, there are folks on this forum who either have or think they have UARS rather than OSA. The difference between UARS and OSA is a matter of where the sleep disordered breathing fits on a continuum. In UARS, people typically arouse
before the airway has collapsed enough to score a hyponea, but there is evidence of increased respiratory effort---i.e. the person is working harder to get air into their lungs in the breathing right before the arousal. (This kind of arousal is called a RERA.) And on an in-lab sleep tests designed to measure UARS, its been noticed that there is a strong correlation between badly distorted inhalations and RERAs. So it's hypothesized that flow limitations (in the form of badly distorted inhalations) are what wakes people with UARS up. So people with UARS often try to minimize activity in the flow limitation graph, often because they are worried that the algorithm for scoring RERAs may not be picking up all of the RERAs that are still occurring while using CPAP.
But it's not always that simple: Sometimes flow limitations
do not get better when the pressure is increased. Why? Nobody on this forum really knows, but a reasonable hypothesis is that if the flow limitations
do not get better when the pressure is increased, then they're probably not caused by an airway that is becoming unstable and threatening to collapse due to OSA. Rather, maybe they're caused by nasal congestion or (particularly if they're persistent) a deviated septum. And then there's this lovely piece of the puzzle as well: Sometimes too much pressure makes the breathing unstable and those unstable breaths can look like and be scored as flow limitations by the machine.
In a recent phone convo with my sleep Dr. I asked about FL's, she said to ignore it and it means nothing unless I was on some sort of Bipap or equivalent. And that APAP isn't one of those.
My guess is that your sleep doc believes that you have a plain vanilla version of OSA and that as long as your AHI is nice and low and you are not reporting that you are waking up numerous times every single night and having trouble getting back to sleep, then the machine's Auto algorithm can deal with whatever flow limitations there are without needing to focus on them as a specific issue.
It would be nice to have a CPAP for dummies simple explanation.
15-20 years ago most patients were given straight CPAP machines that recorded nothing but how long you used the machine. You had to fight (and fight
hard) to get a machine that recorded the efficacy data---i.e. the stuff you see in Oscar. Back then, most sleep docs and DMEs thought it was fine if a sleep apnea patient had
no information at all about how well their machine was working in terms of treating their OSA. In other words, the sleep docs and DMEs wanted to treat us patients like mushrooms---something to be kept in the dark.
So there's been a change in how much information the average patient is now given access to (through things like MyAir and the fact that many more patients are now set up with AutoPAPs instead of dumb data-free CPAPs. But there's still a lot of folks out there in sleep medicine who seem to believe the average patient is just too dumb to understand any of what's going on. And that's why there's no CPAP for dummies simple explanations for a lot of things.
Here is my chart from last night. I had my P30i on and switched to my F40i at 1:39 because my nose was going stuffy.
For what it's worth: The flow limitation graphs on the two charts you've posted don't actually look that bad. If these were my charts, I would not be worried as much about the flow limitations as the raggedness in the flow rate graph itself: It is possible that you are having more spontaneous arousals than you realize. It is also possible that since some CAs seem to be mixed in with periods where flow limitations are being scored, that your flow limitations may be unstable breathing that is not being caused by an airway that is threatening to collapse.
super7pilot wrote: ↑Mon Nov 25, 2024 9:51 pm
I have been overall more rested as I get used to the therapy.
...
Now that I'm improving I seem to be chasing after that last very elusive mosquito that I can hear but can't see.
If I were you, I'd focus less on trying to eliminate the last of the flow limitations (i.e. the elusive mosquito) and more on how you are feeling. Sometimes when we try to chase the "perfect" flow rate curve with a 0.0 AHI and no flow limitations all night long, all we do is make it harder to just get some really nice, decent enough sleep that allows us to be at our best in the daytime.
In other words, don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good.
Like my post in the other forum eluded to. After working in electronics for nuke weapons systems. I am used to dealing with absolutes. This equals that, full stop. None of this mysterious "it depends' 'might be'
As a mathematician, I can understand a bit about what you mean by "dealing with absolutes"---you've either got a theorem proved or you don't.
But in my own long and very difficult journey to becoming a successful happy PAPer, I learned to think of dealing with CPAP/APAP/BiPAP/AutoBiPAP as a
process. As in it's more like working with mathematical
conjectures rather than the end result (a proved theorem). It takes a whole lot of mucking around playing with ideas that
don't work out to turn a conjecture into a theorem, and part of that process is tweaking the hypotheses---i.e. the mysterious "it depends" and "might be's" of the proof-
finding process.