95% leak rate 7.2
- Marcusstephen
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:39 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
95% leak rate 7.2
Hi All
Just wondering if “95% leak rate 7.2 (down arrow) zero”
is too low? Sorry if i seem confused but my understanding is that it should be minimum 24 litres per minute?
This is my result in sleephq.
Just wondering if “95% leak rate 7.2 (down arrow) zero”
is too low? Sorry if i seem confused but my understanding is that it should be minimum 24 litres per minute?
This is my result in sleephq.
BAD BABY
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
No, 24lpm is the upper limit of what's "ok".Marcusstephen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:12 amHi All
Just wondering if “95% leak rate 7.2 (down arrow) zero”
is too low? Sorry if i seem confused but my understanding is that it should be minimum 24 litres per minute?
This is my result in sleephq.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
- Marcusstephen
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:39 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
Aaaaaah ok thanks for setting me straight
So what figure are we looking for to achieve
the best result ?
So what figure are we looking for to achieve
the best result ?
BAD BABY
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
Less than 24lpm and not waking you up.Marcusstephen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:17 amAaaaaah ok thanks for setting me straight
So what figure are we looking for to achieve
the best result ?
Lower is better, but if you're sleeping through it, don't sweat it.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
- Marcusstephen
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:39 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- Marcusstephen
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:39 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
Can you tell me the ideal settings for flow limitations
I’m guessing zero limitations are what’s desirable
but at what level is it affecting therapy too much ?
I’m guessing zero limitations are what’s desirable
but at what level is it affecting therapy too much ?
BAD BABY
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
Flow limitations aren't something that has a number on the official Resmed software, it just goes from "normal breaths" (zero FL) to "severely FL breaths".Marcusstephen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:31 amCan you tell me the ideal settings for flow limitations
I’m guessing zero limitations are what’s desirable
but at what level is it affecting therapy too much ?
Lower is better, and auto machines will bump up pressure if the FL's are much more than a fifth of full chart height.
Post a chart or two. wiki/index.php/Oscar:organize
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
- Marcusstephen
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 9:39 pm
- Location: Gold Coast Queensland Australia
Re: 95% leak rate 7.2
thanks again Palerider, as always your input is very much appreciated.palerider wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 10:00 pmFlow limitations aren't something that has a number on the official Resmed software, it just goes from "normal breaths" (zero FL) to "severely FL breaths".Marcusstephen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 07, 2022 1:31 amCan you tell me the ideal settings for flow limitations
I’m guessing zero limitations are what’s desirable
but at what level is it affecting therapy too much ?
Lower is better, and auto machines will bump up pressure if the FL's are much more than a fifth of full chart height.
Post a chart or two. wiki/index.php/Oscar:organize
BAD BABY