Page 5 of 6

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:11 pm
by jnk...
jimbud wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:04 pm
Once again something one says rises up to bite them.
JPB
That is why my default policy is never to say anything meaningful in forums.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:15 pm
by jimbud
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:11 pm
jimbud wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:04 pm
Once again something one says rises up to bite them.
JPB
That is why my default policy is never to say anything meaningful in forums.
With mostly mixed results. :wink:
JPB

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:26 pm
by jnk...
My posts are works of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of my imagination or are used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events or actual facts are purely coincidental.

I post the above for use the next time one of my posts gets on Granny's nerves.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:32 pm
by jimbud
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:26 pm
My posts are works of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of my imagination or are used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events or actual facts are purely coincidental.

I post the above for use the next time one of my posts gets on Granny's nerves.
A very wise move.
I probably should have thought of that. :cry:
Always one move behind. :?
JPB

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:47 pm
by palerider
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:26 pm
My posts are works of fiction. Names, characters, businesses, places, events, locales, and incidents are either the products of my imagination or are used in a fictitious manner. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events or actual facts are purely coincidental.

I post the above for use the next time one of my posts gets on Granny's nerves.
I'm pretty sure that that post got on Granny's nerves.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:55 pm
by jnk...
palerider wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 1:47 pm
I'm pretty sure that that post got on Granny's nerves.
Ah! My work in this thread is done!!

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:37 pm
by elavi001
ChicagoGranny wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 12:57 pm
elavi001 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:49 pm


captain obvious I still don't know the answer to my question. It could be something else going on, but It could still very well be that CPAP isn't working for me.
It could be that book you read telling you to take two-hour naps.
elavi001 wrote:
Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:30 pm
Why are you limiting nap lengths to 15 minutes? Naps are beneficial for up to 2 hours in duration.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=176503&p=1318659#top
Anecdotal, but Roger Federer takes a 2-hour mid-afternoon nap every day (+ 10 hours at night!) and he's one of the highest performing people on the planet.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:13 pm
by ChicagoGranny
elavi001 wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:37 pm
Anecdotal, but Roger Federer takes a 2-hour mid-afternoon nap every day (+ 10 hours at night!) and he's one of the highest performing people on the planet.
Roger is not whining and griping.

You are.
elavi001 wrote:
Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:11 pm
I have been using CPAP every night for a year. I just want to know why I'm not feeling the benefit.

y'all are condescending as hell.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:22 pm
by jnk...
For everyday people, taking sporadic naps longer than 30 minutes can disrupt nightly sleep and affect metabolism. But for athletes, who eat and exercise a ridiculous amount, napping can play a role in performance.--https://www.espn.com/blog/playbook/tech ... o-athletes

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 5:21 pm
by Thumper68
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:22 pm
For everyday people, taking sporadic naps longer than 30 minutes can disrupt nightly sleep and affect metabolism. But for athletes, who eat and exercise a ridiculous amount, napping can play a role in performance.--https://www.espn.com/blog/playbook/tech ... o-athletes
What are you trying to say! That I don't exert as much energy as a professional athlete? I will have you know that it is 14 steps from my recliner to the fridge! That also includes a flight of stairs with 4 steps!!! Geez! the athletes are in better shape syndrome is strong in this one! :wink:

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 5:59 pm
by chunkyfrog
Just wait until this one feels the ravages of time.
I would enumerate; but I would need a pill right afterward.

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:03 pm
by elavi001
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:22 pm
For everyday people, taking sporadic naps longer than 30 minutes can disrupt nightly sleep and affect metabolism. But for athletes, who eat and exercise a ridiculous amount, napping can play a role in performance.--https://www.espn.com/blog/playbook/tech ... o-athletes
Youre gonna trust some random Zach McCann over the lead authority researcher on naps Sara Mednick PhD?

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:04 pm
by elavi001
ChicagoGranny wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:13 pm
elavi001 wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:37 pm
Anecdotal, but Roger Federer takes a 2-hour mid-afternoon nap every day (+ 10 hours at night!) and he's one of the highest performing people on the planet.
Roger is not whining and griping.

You are.
elavi001 wrote:
Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:11 pm
I have been using CPAP every night for a year. I just want to know why I'm not feeling the benefit.

y'all are condescending as hell.
Ahh got it. So If you whine and gripe, naps are bad for you. If you are calm and collected, naps are good for you. Brilliant conclusion!

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:47 pm
by palerider
elavi001 wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:03 pm
jnk... wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 4:22 pm
For everyday people, taking sporadic naps longer than 30 minutes can disrupt nightly sleep and affect metabolism. But for athletes, who eat and exercise a ridiculous amount, napping can play a role in performance.--https://www.espn.com/blog/playbook/tech ... o-athletes
Youre gonna trust some random Zach McCann over the lead authority researcher on naps Sara Mednick PhD?
IN YOUR HEAD...

Re: 12 Year old study claims "Mild OSA should not be treated." Thoughts?

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 1:41 pm
by Dog Slobber
elavi001 wrote:
Wed Aug 14, 2019 3:37 pm

Anecdotal, but Roger Federer takes a 2-hour mid-afternoon nap every day (+ 10 hours at night!) and he's one of the highest performing people on the planet.
elavi001, I may not know Roger Federer. But what I can say is; elavi001, you are no Roger Federer.