Page 2 of 5
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:19 pm
by SDBud
LSAT wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:18 pm
Let's eliminate the troublemakers (Knightsleeper and the helicopter boy) from the board
There are MORE WORTHY candidates. MANY more.
Some FAR more worthy, but THEY are 'sheltered', like children, and can't BE touched.
MAYBE we should just ban anyone who posts an OT thread...
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:25 pm
by babydinosnoreless
jimbud wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 8:09 pm
babydinosnoreless wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:24 pm
Who decides who are the troublemakers ? I know who I would vote off the island. It wouldn't be the experts.
Edited: wait a second. How come the full poll didn't show till after I voted? It didn't give me names !
You know I didn't see the names either. Probably did not register.
I saw the poll,knew what it meant, logged in and voted.
I would have sworn there were no names there when I first looked though.
If you decide to take it to court I will testify for you.
JPB
Haha thanks.
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:30 pm
by kbh209
*removes his CPAP mask before he talks*
The way I see it ... crap...*puts glasses on* ...there we go. The way I see it is to let them sort it out, they will eventually run out of gas and stop bothering others, once they realize they're not going to win. Even if the troublemakers do get banned, there are ways to get around a ban with message board technology the way it is. It doesn't matter if it's phpBB or any other company, the loophole is still there. So, that's my thoughts.
JNK it's your turn to do dishes, DogSlobber continue slobbering and ChunkyFrog, it's your turn to vacuum. G'nite.
*takes off glasses and puts CPAP mask on*
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:33 pm
by Grace~~~
kbh209 - LOL
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:39 pm
by babydinosnoreless
Pugsy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:38 pm
babydinosnoreless wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:31 pm
Pugsy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:28 pm
Did you guys miss the subject matter at the top of the poll choices????
LSAT was real specific as to who he thinks the troublemakers are.
poll.JPG
It doesn't show till after you vote.
I think maybe that you just didn't notice it. It's there for all the world to see even if a person isn't a member here and can't vote. I just logged out to see if it shows up.....it does.
I am on my iphone.
Doesn't really matter it wouldn't change my vote. I am for the right of free speech. That being said this is not a full democracy. We don't all get to vote. You Pugsy are the only one who speaks for Johnny and its his house.
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:41 pm
by jimbud
kbh209 wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 8:30 pm
*removes his CPAP mask before he talks*
The way I see it ... crap...*puts glasses on* ...there we go. The way I see it is to let them sort it out, they will eventually run out of gas and stop bothering others, once they realize they're not going to win. Even if the troublemakers do get banned, there are ways to get around a ban with message board technology the way it is. It doesn't matter if it's phpBB or any other company, the loophole is still there. So, that's my thoughts.
JNK it's your turn to do dishes, DogSlobber continue slobbering and ChunkyFrog, it's your turn to vacuum. G'nite.
*takes off glasses and puts CPAP mask on*
No they won't. You have to understand he knows he isn't going to "win" that isn't the game he is playing.
He craves attention. Good or bad. It does not matter to him. He will just go on and on. No doubt he will come up with some other twist and be back.
Just one old man's opinion,
JPB
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 8:51 pm
by palerider
jnk... wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 7:44 pm
I find it difficult to vote for limiting the free speech of those who call for limitations to free speech.
And I find it difficult to call for bullying those attempting to bully those they consider bullies.
So I guess my only choice is kick myself out of this thread before I accidentally foe myself somehow or something.
On the plus side, you wouldn't have to read your meanacing posts anymore if you did foe yourself!
(you meanie)
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:13 pm
by Pugsy
babydinosnoreless wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 8:39 pm
We don't all get to vote. You Pugsy are the only one who speaks for Johnny and its his house.
There's only one person's vote that ultimately really matters and it isn't mine. I don't speak for Johnny.....he speaks for himself.
This poll gives people another voice...that's all it does and the same rights that allow the constant reincarnation of threads bitching about threads being locked .....gives LSAT the right to do his poll and people to respond however they want to respond.
Will either actually accomplish anything???? Remains to be seen but I won't be holding my breath except to maybe to try to ward off the stink of the cesspool contents.
My personal opinion for what little it is worth...2 wrongs have never ever made a right.
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:22 pm
by Goofproof
Four Rights point you the same way. Jim
Re: OT: Bored Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:27 pm
by chunkyfrog
Freedom of speech is tempered by the responsibility to do no harm.
Yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre is similar to giving misleading or false advice here.
(Please note spelling change suggestion above.)
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:46 pm
by babydinosnoreless
Pugsy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 9:13 pm
babydinosnoreless wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 8:39 pm
We don't all get to vote. You Pugsy are the only one who speaks for Johnny and its his house.
There's only one person's vote that ultimately really matters and it isn't mine. I don't speak for Johnny.....he speaks for himself.
This poll gives people another voice...that's all it does and the same rights that allow the constant reincarnation of threads bitching about threads being locked .....gives LSAT the right to do his poll and people to respond however they want to respond.
Will either actually accomplish anything???? Remains to be seen but I won't be holding my breath except to maybe to try to ward off the stink of the cesspool contents.
My personal opinion for what little it is worth...2 wrongs have never ever made a right.
Sorry poor choice of words. You are his sheriff or maybe if you watch Game of Thrones "hand of the king" You follow his directions and make sure his wishes are carried out. ( basically you are stuck in the crypt drinking wine while all the night kings dead pop out around you. Not fun.
)
Re: OT: Bored Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:58 pm
by babydinosnoreless
chunkyfrog wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 9:27 pm
Freedom of speech is tempered by the responsibility to do no harm.
Yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre is similar to giving misleading or false advice here.
(Please note spelling change suggestion above.)
Good point though I would say that sometimes people give misleading or false advise because they believe it to be correct. Intent is, IMO, also part of the equation. Would the person shouting fire really believed there is a fire vrs. the person who was shouting fire to get attention?
Re: OT: Bored Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 10:21 pm
by jnk...
chunkyfrog wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 9:27 pm
. . . Yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre . . .
I prefer the Steve Martin method of yelling "Movie!" in a crowded firehouse.
Re: OT: Bored Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 10:24 pm
by chunkyfrog
jnk... wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 10:21 pm
chunkyfrog wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 9:27 pm
. . . Yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre . . .
I prefer the Steve Martin method of yelling "Movie!" in a crowded firehouse.
So very true.
Re: OT: Board Troublemakers
Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 10:27 pm
by palerider
Pugsy wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2019 9:13 pm
..2 wrongs have never ever made a right.
But, three rights DO make a left!
