Re: What if...?
Posted: Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:56 pm
ChicagoGranny, If treating the symptom works it seems it should work for those who are most sick...
I do agree that their idea of compliance and mine are vastly different, but I didn't set up the study. It seems that "experts" in cardiology set up the study...
Should we blindly listen to the "experts...?"
With all that said, I am also surprised that they didn't see any improvements. A little bit of intervention seems better than none, but with cardiovascular risk in really sick people that doesn't seem to hold true.
Sorry I wasn't clear on skipping. I was thinking that rejuvenating ghost blood vessels could be beneficial to those really sick people suffering from cardiovascular problems. I should have included a link to your Ghost Blood Vessel discussion.
I do agree that their idea of compliance and mine are vastly different, but I didn't set up the study. It seems that "experts" in cardiology set up the study...
Should we blindly listen to the "experts...?"
With all that said, I am also surprised that they didn't see any improvements. A little bit of intervention seems better than none, but with cardiovascular risk in really sick people that doesn't seem to hold true.
Sorry I wasn't clear on skipping. I was thinking that rejuvenating ghost blood vessels could be beneficial to those really sick people suffering from cardiovascular problems. I should have included a link to your Ghost Blood Vessel discussion.