I have noticed that my performance deteriorated in past when i stopped using APAP for few weeks. But lately I am noticing the problem even with 100% compliance and AHI of 2.6- to 3.2.
Is my respironics APAP giving correct AHI when I check every morning? Can there be any other reason that my therapy is less effective?
Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
-
champak2001
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 2:26 pm
Re: Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
Depends on what you consider 100% , compliance is a useless number, set by INS companies to mark if they should support your health, and so they can keep making money off you.
What you need to know, your treatment must be correct for you, you must use it every time you might go to sleep, not just a few hours a night. You also need a machine that collects full data and a program to read it, then you can adjust your treatment to work better. Jim
What you need to know, your treatment must be correct for you, you must use it every time you might go to sleep, not just a few hours a night. You also need a machine that collects full data and a program to read it, then you can adjust your treatment to work better. Jim
Use data to optimize your xPAP treatment!
"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire
"The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient while nature cures the disease." Voltaire
Re: Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
What do you mean by performance?champak2001 wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 2:38 pmI have noticed that my performance deteriorated in past when i stopped using APAP for few weeks. But lately I am noticing the problem even with 100% compliance and AHI of 2.6- to 3.2.
Is my respironics APAP giving correct AHI when I check every morning? Can there be any other reason that my therapy is less effective?
_________________
| Machine: ResMed AirSense™ 10 AutoSet™ CPAP Machine with HumidAir™ Heated Humidifier |
| Mask: Fisher & Paykel Vitera Full Face Mask with Headgear (S, M, or L Cushion) |
| Additional Comments: Back up is a new AS10. |
Re: Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
Besides "What do you mean by performance?," how do you know? You said you stopped using it, so what kind of metric do you have for that period?LSAT wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 3:59 pmWhat do you mean by performance?champak2001 wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 2:38 pmI have noticed that my performance deteriorated in past when i stopped using APAP for few weeks. But lately I am noticing the problem even with 100% compliance and AHI of 2.6- to 3.2.
Is my respironics APAP giving correct AHI when I check every morning? Can there be any other reason that my therapy is less effective?
Re: Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
Personally, if my AHI were above 2 on a regular basis, it would adversely affect my well being. If you can get yours better without causing other problems, I encourage you to make that effort. Count and duration are major factors in our AHI. The person who has few events but they each last for a long time still has a problem needing addressed.
_________________
| Mask: TAP PAP Nasal Pillow CPAP Mask with Improved Stability Mouthpiece |
| Humidifier: S9™ Series H5i™ Heated Humidifier with Climate Control |
| Additional Comments: Bleep/DreamPort for full nights, Tap Pap for shorter sessions |
My SleepDancing Video link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE7WA_5c73c
Re: Is AHI a reliable indicator of efficacy of therapy?
"Compliance" doesn't mean squat if your system isn't adjusted for your needs... it's like wearing the wrong pair of glasses.. you can wear 'em all day long and still not be able to see clearly.champak2001 wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 2:38 pmI have noticed that my performance deteriorated in past when i stopped using APAP for few weeks. But lately I am noticing the problem even with 100% compliance and AHI of 2.6- to 3.2.
Is my respironics APAP giving correct AHI when I check every morning? Can there be any other reason that my therapy is less effective?
And 2.6-3.2 is higher than I'd call 'good' for AHI... under 2 is where I figure we start to get to 'yeah, probably acceptable.'.
Get OSCAR
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.
Accounts to put on the foe list: dataq1, clownbell, gearchange, lynninnj, mper!?, DreamDiver, Geer1, almostadoctor, sleepgeek, ajack, stom, mogy, D.H., They often post misleading, timewasting stuff.

