Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:13 am
I'd just like to add a few additional comments to this thread and then I'll leave it alone.
Over the years I've had quite a number of friends and relatives with genuine disabilities -- things that required some sort of public accommodation for them to lead something close to "normal" lives. Sometimes those accommodations were in the workplace and may have been something as simple as removing a curb between the parking lot and the workplace so that someone in a wheelchair could get to the door. Most of those folks don't seek out any special treatment and are genuinely grateful for the changes that are made for them.
However, some disabilities may restrict what jobs the individual can do. A person who is unable to walk can probably work for the telephone company but probably can't climb poles to do repairs. When accommodations can't be made for a particular job, then employers often move the employee to another job that they can handle.
Very few people have a problem with doing a little extra for those who genuinely need it. My only gripe with the ADA is that it, like most federal programs, has expanded far beyond what its well-intentioned architects envisioned. FDR's Social Security program was to provide a small supplemental pension to older folks. The last time I visited the local Social Security office, the place was absolutely packed, but my wife and I were the only 60-somethings there.
So getting back to Lloyd's original question that began this thread: Is sleep apnea a disability? His potential employer used this definition: "A disabled person is defined as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as have such an impairment."
It seems to me that it's ridiculous to consider someone who's being successfully treated for sleep apnea as handicapped. To do so, you would almost have to include in that category: those being treated for diabetes, those being treated for hypertension, those being treated for high cholesterol, those who wear corrective lenses, those who wear hearing aids, those who wear orthopedic shoes and virtually everyone else who has ever needed a little help to make it through the day (or the night).
Just my opinion, Lloyd, but I suggest that you just check the "no" box on your application and let it go at that.
OCO
Over the years I've had quite a number of friends and relatives with genuine disabilities -- things that required some sort of public accommodation for them to lead something close to "normal" lives. Sometimes those accommodations were in the workplace and may have been something as simple as removing a curb between the parking lot and the workplace so that someone in a wheelchair could get to the door. Most of those folks don't seek out any special treatment and are genuinely grateful for the changes that are made for them.
However, some disabilities may restrict what jobs the individual can do. A person who is unable to walk can probably work for the telephone company but probably can't climb poles to do repairs. When accommodations can't be made for a particular job, then employers often move the employee to another job that they can handle.
Very few people have a problem with doing a little extra for those who genuinely need it. My only gripe with the ADA is that it, like most federal programs, has expanded far beyond what its well-intentioned architects envisioned. FDR's Social Security program was to provide a small supplemental pension to older folks. The last time I visited the local Social Security office, the place was absolutely packed, but my wife and I were the only 60-somethings there.
So getting back to Lloyd's original question that began this thread: Is sleep apnea a disability? His potential employer used this definition: "A disabled person is defined as someone who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as have such an impairment."
It seems to me that it's ridiculous to consider someone who's being successfully treated for sleep apnea as handicapped. To do so, you would almost have to include in that category: those being treated for diabetes, those being treated for hypertension, those being treated for high cholesterol, those who wear corrective lenses, those who wear hearing aids, those who wear orthopedic shoes and virtually everyone else who has ever needed a little help to make it through the day (or the night).
Just my opinion, Lloyd, but I suggest that you just check the "no" box on your application and let it go at that.
OCO