CPAPtalk.com

xxyzx wrote:i rarely do requests
i never do demands

go find them yourself
they came up asap for me on google when i replied to that lady about her mother

i have no need to convince you of anything
you libturds will believe what you want anyway
so not wasting my time on a futile venture

xxyzx wrote:

palerider wrote:

xxyzx wrote:i found both immediately

But apparently aren't smart enough to figure out how to post them.

====

as always you prove yourself to be a fool as well as a bleeping bleep

i do not write down the url for every site i visit in case some libturd is too stupid to use google and demands to see them

xxyzx wrote:you are quibbling whether the one size fits nobody predetermined volume

xxyzx wrote:
bs
ms
phd
PE
taught at two major unis
asst dean at a minor uni

Madalot wrote:Here's another point that needs to be digested. I have cheap insurance and they don't pay for anything they don't have to. I went from CPAP, to BIPAP and directly to the Trilogy on AVAPS. If ASV would have been sufficient, don't you think my insurance would have INSISTED on that over the Trilogy since the Trilogy is a perpetual rental to the tune of $1500 a month (was at the time - has been lowered to around $700 a month now)? Think about that one, okay? No way in hell my insurance would have approved the Trilogy if an ASV would have been able to do basically the same thing.

OR

They would have insisted on trying ASV before going to the Trilogy. And initially, I wondered why they didn't. A lot of people, Robysue being one of them, explained it so it made sense why they ruled out ASV. They IMMEDIATELY approved the Trilogy after failure on bipap. No way they would have done that if, as alphabet guy insists, ASV and AVAPS are basically the same. No way in hell.

Just because you cannot grasp the concept doesn't mean it's not valid. Hey - a lot of people have concepts they just cannot grasp. There's no shame in it. The shame is in continuing to insist on your understanding when the evidence shows you're wrong. And I'm so so sorry - but you are wrong on this one.

xxyzx wrote:
bs
ms
phd
PE
taught at two major unis
asst dean at a minor uni

xxyzx wrote:

poppi2 wrote:

palerider wrote:

xxyzx wrote:i found both immediately

But apparently aren't smart enough to figure out how to post them.

I Triple-Dog-Dare him to post the links.

=========

you libturds are so ridiculous

if i bothered to post them you would whine about something else that was irrelevant

Guest wrote:

xxyzx wrote:

poppi2 wrote:

palerider wrote:

xxyzx wrote:i found both immediately

But apparently aren't smart enough to figure out how to post them.

I Triple-Dog-Dare him to post the links.

=========

you libturds are so ridiculous

if i bothered to post them you would whine about something else that was irrelevant

Robysue posted links backing up what she said.
You did not.
Who do you think people are going to believe?
Think about it carefully.

xxyzx wrote:

Madalot wrote:

Madalot wrote:Here's another point that needs to be digested. I have cheap insurance and they don't pay for anything they don't have to. I went from CPAP, to BIPAP and directly to the Trilogy on AVAPS. If ASV would have been sufficient, don't you think my insurance would have INSISTED on that over the Trilogy since the Trilogy is a perpetual rental to the tune of $1500 a month (was at the time - has been lowered to around $700 a month now)? Think about that one, okay? No way in hell my insurance would have approved the Trilogy if an ASV would have been able to do basically the same thing.

OR

They would have insisted on trying ASV before going to the Trilogy. And initially, I wondered why they didn't. A lot of people, Robysue being one of them, explained it so it made sense why they ruled out ASV. They IMMEDIATELY approved the Trilogy after failure on bipap. No way they would have done that if, as alphabet guy insists, ASV and AVAPS are basically the same. No way in hell.

Just because you cannot grasp the concept doesn't mean it's not valid. Hey - a lot of people have concepts they just cannot grasp. There's no shame in it. The shame is in continuing to insist on your understanding when the evidence shows you're wrong. And I'm so so sorry - but you are wrong on this one.

Guess I got you on this one, huh? Can't argue with this logic obviously.

For the record, when talking about the OP where this discussion began, alphabet guy kind of has a point that pertaining to that situation, the question about whether or not the Trilogy would keep going even after her mother passed WAS the question. Whether on ASV or Trilogy using AVAPS, for that specific question, doesn't make a difference between machines. HOWEVER....

alphabet guy went on to make the claims that ASV & AVAPS are basically the same, therapy wise, which is what started this.

alphabet guy keeps trying to backtrack to the OP's post/point when he's cornered on the other discussion. When you have no clue what you're talking about and spew inaccuracies like facts, people here ARE going to correct you. And obviously, you can't stand being told you've gotten anything wrong.

Edited to add: And I state the obvious. Sorry, it's kind of early and I'm tired today!!

=

rotflamo

i was talking about the machine the lady used for her mom

what your insurance and doctor did is irrelevant to that discussion

xxyzx wrote:

palerider wrote:

xxyzx wrote:i found both immediately

But apparently aren't smart enough to figure out how to post them.

====

as always you prove yourself to be a fool as well as a bleeping bleep

i do not write down the url for every site i visit in case some libturd is too stupid to use google and demands to see them

installing and using sleepyhead

Sheffey wrote:

installing and using sleepyhead

After 116 posts in this thread, I suggest you change the thread subject line to "Inability to Install and Use Sleepyhead".