CPAPtalk.com

kteague wrote:

Goofproof wrote: Truth isn't worth much to Liberals, it interferes making their point fit their needs. Jim

xxyzx wrote: todays liberal is pure evil

Sigh.

I doubt that you really expected a different response.

I appreciate the effort though.

.

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.

just start reading: search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts

I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.
I read the rest of this thread and it seems like the political name calling is what causes most of the rage.

I am very political so nothing I have seen is new to me.

TedVPAP wrote:

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.

just start reading: search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts

I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.

it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.

just start reading: search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts

I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.

it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.

+2 to this.

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:Although I have been a member for 6 or 7 years, I do not follow this forum much so I am unfamiliar with everyone. I do not know what xyz... has posted to warrant criticism. As an engineer who loves to analyze the confliction caused by technical disputes versus personalities, I would be happy to examine if someone could point to a model thread.

just start reading: search.php?author_id=81876&sr=posts

I certainly did not review the complete list but what I saw caused me no concern.

it causes concern to people that realize that a very large percentage of what he says... about cpap, is wrong, or at the very best, superfluous.

Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.

Try this one:

paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html

TASmart wrote:Try this one:

paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html

Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.

TedVPAP wrote:Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.

seriously?

being able to see the fallacy offered in the posts of "a certain poster" requires a background and understanding so that you can tell that when the person in question says 'up is left' (for instance) you know that is wrong.

lacking the background and understanding, you have to read the thread, see a post by "a certain poster" and then read the refutations that follow it, so...

NO, there's no single post you can read... TANSTAAFL.

Who is that used to always say you shouldn't be so thin skinned? Esp. on the internet.
Esp. on this forum, eh.

DreamStalker wrote: Neither the GOP nor DEM give a fricken krap about you or me ... figure it out or face the consequences (fast approaching)!

Agree: Grandmother had Republican big-wigs friends, mom with democrat friends. Never felt either group truly cared except for their own agenda that helped themselves or their friends in some fashion. If they did something for the common person was to get reelected.

TedVPAP wrote:

TASmart wrote:Try this one:

paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html

Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.

Was not intentional, it was supposed to link to the ASV discussion. Feel free to go find it yourself. I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?

TASmart wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:

TASmart wrote:Try this one:

paptalk.com/CPAP-Sleep-Apnea-Forum.html

Posting a "link" which INTENTIONALLY does not address the specific question which was asked is nothing more than "superfluous". You have scored a negative point. Perhaps I should start a shaming thread on you.

Was not intentional, it was supposed to link to the ASV discussion. Feel free to go find it yourself. I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?

My apologies. I meant to add a symbol after the "threat" as it was a joke. The idea of a "shaming thread" makes me laugh.
I will look for the ASV discussion. Thanks

TASmart wrote: I can understand if you did not think it answered your question, but a threat? really?

A display of the "thin skin" in need of moderation?

Well, there has been at least one shaming thread, that I know of. Apology accepted with relish, glad I bit my finger (so to say) and didn't fire off a snot-o-gram to ya, I really am resolved to not get involved in any more crap slinging, makes me feel worse about myself than I make any poster feel.

palerider wrote:

TedVPAP wrote:Is there a post that some one can point to that I should read to prove the point, or do I need to read everything he has ever written before I can come to such an astute realization?
Looks like I am back to my original question.

seriously?

being able to see the fallacy offered in the posts of "a certain poster" requires a background and understanding so that you can tell that when the person in question says 'up is left' (for instance) you know that is wrong.

lacking the background and understanding, you have to read the thread, see a post by "a certain poster" and then read the refutations that follow it, so...

NO, there's no single post you can read... TANSTAFFL.

I understand (although I don't understand your acronym). It can be like pointing to an example that proves once and for all that Trump is either good or evil. I thought there might be an example thread worth examining.