Tell me is this average-Encore Data
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:40 am
Thanks so much for this dialogue it is educating me in the reading of these
charts. Please continue. Thanks..
charts. Please continue. Thanks..
A Forum For All Things CPAP
https://www.cpaptalk.com/
I think what you did was too complicated - I don't see why we need time spent in apnea to find the total number - but maybe I didn't understand what info you're looking for.krousseau wrote:My question actually has less to do with what is included in the reporting than it does with the question I asked-did I do the calculation right based on the numbers given-using AI as only apnea, time in apnea only as time in apnea, and duration of apnea as duration of only apnea.
Right. My Encore only reads the data written (logged) by Encore Pro in the database on your computer. Encore Pro gets the data from the machine, writes what it gets on your computer, and has one way of showing you (reporting) this data. My Encore has another. It is very obvious that there is date Encore Pro logs, but doesn't report - we don't know why. Time spent in apnea is such data, and so is variable breathing. The info is written in the database created by Encore Pro, but only My Encore picks this data up and reports it to the user.krousseau wrote:PS; The source of the discrepancy I perceive is likely due to the fact that the AI is reported from Encore Pro and the duration of apneas and total time spent in apnea is reported from My Encore-something I had not thought about on the first and second passes at this. I wouldn't be surprised if the My Encore program doesn't derive its numbers exactly the way Encore does
Absolutely! It was an exercise in looking at the report and figuring things out. We don't have to do that---normally---and am I glad! I went backwards because when I looked at the numbers-I immediately thought those are great-until I got to the duration of apneas and total time spent in apnea then I thought that can't be right! So working with the numbers I had--I tried to recalculate an AI that would fit those numbers and they went from 0.6 to 2.4-all good. It did enter my mind to do it algebraically-but that really would have been too much of a challenge for my mathematical ability. This is from a person who got to high school before figuring out where the 1 goes when you multiply it by 0. You have no idea how many teachers I drove crazy with my questions.I think what you did was too complicated - I don't see why we need time spent in apnea to find the total number