CPAPtalk.com

PEF wrote:Just remember, the Dems have never denied that the Wikileaks emails are real. They just want to blame it on the Russians. What a bunch of crap.

What's to deny? Why defend something that doesn't need defending? The Dems are smarter than that.

With everything that's been on the news about Russia's obvious involvement in this.. you still don't think the Russians had anything to do with the emails? What more proof do you need?

Another leaked email shows how extensive Hillary's PAY to PLAY at the State Department:



http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-2 ... ighest-bid

This woman really should be in jail.

SleepyMagee - you really play fast and loose with the "FACTS".

I don't accept any DNC or Hillary Clinton PROPAGANDA as fact.

PEF wrote:SleepyMagee - you really play fast and loose with the "FACTS".

I don't accept any DNC or Hillary Clinton PROPAGANDA as fact.

If you are going to accuse me of being inaccurate, please be specific with which fact(s) you disagree with.

Additionally, I see you are still locked into the russian propaganda site zerohedge even after you've been alerted to the fact that they draw high numbers of anti semites and xenophobes. Beyond that, they clearly misled you in an article about the size of the tim kaine rally...

Why are you willing to accept such behavior from one 'news' outlet but not another? Why no articles from VOX or Mother Earth News? Do 'far right' sites have a monopoly on 'real news'? Or is it that they have a monopoly on the news you want to hear?

Here is another opinion from a Professor from Stonybrook who has a remarkable track record of predicting elections. There are several other professors across the country who think Trump will win. And there is a new piece from Michael Moore, who STILL thinks Trump will win. There is a lot of profanity in the piece, so I will not post it.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/22/t ... d-predicts

I have no idea who will win.

SleepyMcgee wrote:

Goofproof wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:"I'd suggest that since Trumps support base is the undereducated unemployed segment of the the country, they have more free time to go listen to a TV game show host endlessly whine about ballot fraud conspiracy theories and why talking about assaulting women is ok."

This is MSM propaganda.

Obviously I was having fun but the FACT remains that trump supporters tend to be less educated and work in stagnating industries.

FACTS.

And that's a BAD thing? Hillaries chronies may have more edcutation, that doesn't mean they are smart, it does mean they stand a better chance of working the system and stealing more of our money. Jim Her campaign is financied, by special interests, a bought and paid for politican. She never found a special interest group she wouldn't sell out to. Jim

I never said it was a bad thing. I was just stating a fact. Which, if you haven't noticed, are hard to come by in this particular thread. I would in fact argue that in general, revolutions are more frequently started by those who are desperate (and many times less educated) than not.

But I will correct you on one thing. The VAST majority of taxes are paid by the top 5% of the population. So the money they are 'stealing' is disproportionately their own.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last week in a post to my thread it was the top 10%, did Hillery stop paying or just her friends? Jim

Goofproof wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

Goofproof wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:"I'd suggest that since Trumps support base is the undereducated unemployed segment of the the country, they have more free time to go listen to a TV game show host endlessly whine about ballot fraud conspiracy theories and why talking about assaulting women is ok."

This is MSM propaganda.

Obviously I was having fun but the FACT remains that trump supporters tend to be less educated and work in stagnating industries.

FACTS.

And that's a BAD thing? Hillaries chronies may have more edcutation, that doesn't mean they are smart, it does mean they stand a better chance of working the system and stealing more of our money. Jim Her campaign is financied, by special interests, a bought and paid for politican. She never found a special interest group she wouldn't sell out to. Jim

I never said it was a bad thing. I was just stating a fact. Which, if you haven't noticed, are hard to come by in this particular thread. I would in fact argue that in general, revolutions are more frequently started by those who are desperate (and many times less educated) than not.

But I will correct you on one thing. The VAST majority of taxes are paid by the top 5% of the population. So the money they are 'stealing' is disproportionately their own.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last week in a post to my thread it was the top 10%, did Hillery stop paying or just her friends? Jim

Top 5% pay a majority. Expand that to top 10% and over 70% of income taxes are covered.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

PEF wrote:Here is another opinion from a Professor from Stonybrook who has a remarkable track record of predicting elections. There are several other professors across the country who think Trump will win. And there is a new piece from Michael Moore, who STILL thinks Trump will win. There is a lot of profanity in the piece, so I will not post it.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/22/t ... d-predicts

I have no idea who will win.

Yeah but professors aren't to be trusted. They are part of the liberal ploy to indoctrinate kids into becoming commies! Or wait...Is that only if the professors say something that doesn't align to their world view??...This is all so hard to keep track of!

Now...About those facts you think I made up.....

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:Here is another opinion from a Professor from Stonybrook who has a remarkable track record of predicting elections. There are several other professors across the country who think Trump will win. And there is a new piece from Michael Moore, who STILL thinks Trump will win. There is a lot of profanity in the piece, so I will not post it.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/22/t ... d-predicts

I have no idea who will win.

Yeah but professors aren't to be trusted. They are part of the liberal ploy to indoctrinate kids into becoming commies! Or wait...Is that only if the professors say something that doesn't align to their world view??...This is all so hard to keep track of!

Now...About those facts you think I made up.....

You are really not making any sense at all. I have no idea what you mean by that first paragraph.

Let's talk about "facts" shall we? You know as well as I do that none of us are really in possession of all the facts. Denial of facts is probably really what politics is all about. That certainly includes YOU. So let's just stick to the discussion of our various "opinions". Stop trying to bully the forum by insinuating that your opinions are facts and the opinions of others are lies.

PEF wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:

PEF wrote:Here is another opinion from a Professor from Stonybrook who has a remarkable track record of predicting elections. There are several other professors across the country who think Trump will win. And there is a new piece from Michael Moore, who STILL thinks Trump will win. There is a lot of profanity in the piece, so I will not post it.

http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/10/22/t ... d-predicts

I have no idea who will win.

Yeah but professors aren't to be trusted. They are part of the liberal ploy to indoctrinate kids into becoming commies! Or wait...Is that only if the professors say something that doesn't align to their world view??...This is all so hard to keep track of!

Now...About those facts you think I made up.....

Let's talk about "facts" shall we? You know as well as I do that none of us are really in possession of all the facts. Denial of facts is probably really what politics is all about. That certainly includes YOU. So let's just stick to the discussion of our various "opinions". Stop trying to bully the forum by insinuating that your opinions are facts and the opinions of others are lies.

Which of facts that I put forth do you believe are simply 'opinions'? If you are going to make such an accusation, please, be specific. Accusations without basis is a bullying tactic.

With that out of the way...

What did I proport as fact that you believe is untrue?

The one where I said Trump supporters tend to be less educated than Hillary supporters?
The one where I said the comments section Zerohedge is filled with xenophobic and anti semitic vitriol?
The unedited video of the Tim Kaine rally that clearly shows Zerohedge was lying and doing fanciful editing to fit a narrative its readers want?

SleepyMcgee wrote:The one where I said Trump supporters tend to be less educated than Hillary supporters?

A citizen is a citizen and each has one vote. Or would you go back to the days when some counted as 3/5 vote?

The regular repeating of your statement is an indication of the arrogance of the Democrat Party.

As a person with graduate degrees, wife with a graduate degree and children with graduate degrees from "prestigious" universities, I find this arrogance sickening enough to make me consider voting for Trump.

Hang Fire wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:The one where I said Trump supporters tend to be less educated than Hillary supporters?

A citizen is a citizen and each has one vote. Or would you go back to the days when some counted as 3/5 vote?

The regular repeating of your statement is an indication of the arrogance of the Democrat Party.

As a person with graduate degrees, wife with a graduate degree and children with graduate degrees from "prestigious" universities, I find this arrogance sickening enough to make me consider voting for Trump.

+1

Hang Fire wrote:

SleepyMcgee wrote:The one where I said Trump supporters tend to be less educated than Hillary supporters?

A citizen is a citizen and each has one vote. Or would you go back to the days when some counted as 3/5 vote?

The regular repeating of your statement is an indication of the arrogance of the Democrat Party.

As a person with graduate degrees, wife with a graduate degree and children with graduate degrees from "prestigious" universities, I find this arrogance sickening enough to make me consider voting for Trump.

Repeating a fact is not arrogant. Nor did I qualify it as being a bad thing. Understanding the socioeconomics and educational attainment of each candidates base is a helpful exercise in learning what does and does not resonate with them etc.

I'm sorry it made you so upset.

Yawn.. I'll be glad when it's over. The cake is baked already, so most of you are wasting air.

On the news just now... Colin Powell supports Hillary Clinton!