Re: Airmony CPAP
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:15 pm
WTFTBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,
---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)
all the flow follows the same path.
---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
WTFTBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,
---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)
all the flow follows the same path.
---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
I'm guessing that, lost in translation, there's something about it working more like a ventilator, which doesn't have a mask leak, it gives you air, then when you exhale, takes it away vents that, and gives you fresh air for the next inhalation. without any tube between the machine and the mask, it's theoretically possible, with a valving arrangement of some sort.chunkyfrog wrote:WTFTBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,
---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)
all the flow follows the same path.
---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
Ooh ooh ooh me me me! I WANT one of those!!Julie wrote:A Rubic's Cpap?
Gasper62 wrote:I am toying with the idea of writing a book about making appeals for the funding of hare-brained, Rube Goldberg types of CPAP contraptions. Any pointers as to where I might get some ideas, and a starting point ? Thanks in advance ! (Pre-publication/pre-order discounts are available to anyone providing usable tips.)
---but they neglected to mention that important detail.palerider wrote:I'm guessing that, lost in translation, there's something about it working more like a ventilator, which doesn't have a mask leak, it gives you air, then when you exhale, takes it away vents that, and gives you fresh air for the next inhalation. without any tube between the machine and the mask, it's theoretically possible, with a valving arrangement of some sort.chunkyfrog wrote:WTFTBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,
---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)
all the flow follows the same path.
---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
I'd hope that, even in spain, killing off ones customers would be seen as being bad for repeat businesschunkyfrog wrote:\---but they neglected to mention that important detail.
--glossed over it, so it may seem.
Always pay attention to what is NOT mentioned--it reveals much.
Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....palerider wrote:meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.
In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
If Franco taught us nothing else . . .palerider wrote: I'd hope that, even in spain, killing off ones customers would be seen as being bad for repeat business
One example http://www.cpapsupplyusa.com/CPBPack-CP ... yPack.aspx 24 hours run time 900g, which is not sitting on your face. So 3 nights and 4.5x the weight with a 5 hour charge time.TBIOM TEAM wrote:Thank you for your comment BlackSpinner,BlackSpinner wrote:All I can say is that if that story is Representative of your company's research skills then I would run as fast as possible in the other direction. For fucks sake there were light weight batteries already on the market 2 years ago. We have threads more then 2 years old on the forum about it.
Could you specify the weights you are talking about?
For Airmony, one night autonomy needs a 200g battery. The device itself weights 280g MASK INCLUDED. We are working on making these weights even smaller.
Hope you found the information useful.
Thank you.
TBIOM team.
sometimes, it's so sharp, I cut myselfOmne wrote:Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....palerider wrote:meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.
In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
Yeppalerider wrote:sometimes, it's so sharp, I cut myselfOmne wrote:Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....palerider wrote:meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.
In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
we can agree, I believe, that the whole indigogo page is .... unfortunate.