Page 4 of 8

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:15 pm
by chunkyfrog
TBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,

---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)

all the flow follows the same path.

---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
WTF

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:16 pm
by Julie

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:40 pm
by palerider
chunkyfrog wrote:
TBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,

---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)

all the flow follows the same path.

---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
WTF
I'm guessing that, lost in translation, there's something about it working more like a ventilator, which doesn't have a mask leak, it gives you air, then when you exhale, takes it away vents that, and gives you fresh air for the next inhalation. without any tube between the machine and the mask, it's theoretically possible, with a valving arrangement of some sort.

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:44 pm
by Gasper62
I am toying with the idea of writing a book about making appeals for the funding of hare-brained, Rube Goldberg types of CPAP contraptions. Any pointers as to where I might get some ideas, and a starting point ? Thanks in advance ! (Pre-publication/pre-order discounts are available to anyone providing usable tips.)

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:07 pm
by Julie
A Rubic's Cpap?

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:11 pm
by jnk...
Julie wrote:A Rubic's Cpap?
Ooh ooh ooh me me me! I WANT one of those!!

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:13 pm
by mummmz
Not me! I hated those Rubic's Cubes! I could never solve them.

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:14 pm
by Grace~~~
Gasper62 wrote:I am toying with the idea of writing a book about making appeals for the funding of hare-brained, Rube Goldberg types of CPAP contraptions. Any pointers as to where I might get some ideas, and a starting point ? Thanks in advance ! (Pre-publication/pre-order discounts are available to anyone providing usable tips.)

I've recently heard that the first thing you need to do is to get yourself a 'bookcoach' ~~~

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:21 pm
by chunkyfrog
palerider wrote:
chunkyfrog wrote:
TBIOM TEAM wrote: . . .
No exhalation valve is needed,

---(Unless you need FRESH air, like for the OXYGEN)

all the flow follows the same path.

---(until you SUFFOCATE!)
WTF
I'm guessing that, lost in translation, there's something about it working more like a ventilator, which doesn't have a mask leak, it gives you air, then when you exhale, takes it away vents that, and gives you fresh air for the next inhalation. without any tube between the machine and the mask, it's theoretically possible, with a valving arrangement of some sort.
---but they neglected to mention that important detail.
--glossed over it, so it may seem.
Always pay attention to what is NOT mentioned--it reveals much.

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:09 pm
by palerider
chunkyfrog wrote:\---but they neglected to mention that important detail.
--glossed over it, so it may seem.
Always pay attention to what is NOT mentioned--it reveals much.
I'd hope that, even in spain, killing off ones customers would be seen as being bad for repeat business

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:28 pm
by Omne
palerider wrote:
jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.

In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*
Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:29 pm
by jnk...
palerider wrote: I'd hope that, even in spain, killing off ones customers would be seen as being bad for repeat business
If Franco taught us nothing else . . .

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:46 pm
by Omne
TBIOM TEAM wrote:
BlackSpinner wrote:All I can say is that if that story is Representative of your company's research skills then I would run as fast as possible in the other direction. For fucks sake there were light weight batteries already on the market 2 years ago. We have threads more then 2 years old on the forum about it.
Thank you for your comment BlackSpinner,

Could you specify the weights you are talking about?

For Airmony, one night autonomy needs a 200g battery. The device itself weights 280g MASK INCLUDED. We are working on making these weights even smaller.

Hope you found the information useful.

Thank you.
TBIOM team.
One example http://www.cpapsupplyusa.com/CPBPack-CP ... yPack.aspx 24 hours run time 900g, which is not sitting on your face. So 3 nights and 4.5x the weight with a 5 hour charge time.
So 2 of these at 1800g gives you up to 6 nights. Not exactly 25,000g like your webpage claims it would take.

So, 6 of your batteries at 1200g vs 2 of the other batteries at 1800g. 2.6lbs compared to 4lbs. I'm not seeing the $1K+ advantage here.

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:50 pm
by palerider
Omne wrote:
palerider wrote:
jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.

In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*
Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....
sometimes, it's so sharp, I cut myself

we can agree, I believe, that the whole indigogo page is .... unfortunate.

Re: Airmony CPAP

Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:51 pm
by Omne
palerider wrote:
Omne wrote:
palerider wrote:
jnk... wrote:Eh, give him a break, palerider. Although the ADHD section may not be the worst-worded section of the page, it IS still misleading, right? I mean, it's not like the ADHD section makes any more sense than the rest of the nonsense on that page.

In my opinion, it's the copy writers/translators who are apparently the ones with the worst air-to-brain ratio that needs fixing.
meh, .... it's probably the *least* misleading bit of the whole page. *lol*
Geez, and they say we have Hyperfocus.....
sometimes, it's so sharp, I cut myself

we can agree, I believe, that the whole indigogo page is .... unfortunate.
Yep