Page 4 of 6

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:15 am
by Wulfman
OCO,

I think you can see the ramifications for those kinds of actions in one of Johnny's paragraphs:
JohnnyGoodman wrote:So, if you an upstanding member of CPAPtalk and want the power to keep its streets free from bad guys you are now able to. If you abuse our system and mark non-spam as spam, you will get away with it only for a short while and then you will lose the ability to delete posts or be banned from cpaptalk completely.
Only a logged in member can see the "Delete Spam" button, so the Administrators would know who it was that did it.....and then they would respond accordingly.

Den


Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:17 am
by Snoozin' Bluezzz
OwlCreekObserver wrote: What about the occasional troll who shows up here solely for the purpose of posting hurtful or offensive comments? People like him could suddenly have the power to delete all posts, effectively disabling this group.
To date I have not noticed a "registered" Troll. We have have our share of unregistered Trolls. Perhaps the ability to wipe out posts would incent them to register - I don't know. I suppose we could weather one such attack understanding we would have to back off such a generous policy.

Like you said - no easy answers. Most of our captions are not so offensive as the one today but I would like some indication that it has already been "killed" so I don't have to bother with it.

David


Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:27 am
by Guest
Dang. You guys have ruined it for us. Now what are we going to do for fun?

Image
-The Unregistered Trolls.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:46 am
by cpapjack
OwlCreekObserver wrote:Just something to consider on this giving everyone the authority to "kill" offensive posts: What about the occasional troll who shows up here solely for the purpose of posting hurtful or offensive comments? People like him could suddenly have the power to delete all posts, effectively disabling this group.
That's a good point Owl.


Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:48 am
by Guest
There's no need to fear! SUPER TROLL is here!

Image


Do not despair, my fellow trolls. Follow me and I will lead you to a new website where we won’t be deleted. The internet; the final frontier. Our mission is to explore strange new forums, seek out new targets and new message boards; to boldly go where no troll has gone before!

Goodbye, cpaptalk.com. You served us well.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:55 am
by wading thru the muck!
OwlCreekObserver wrote:Just something to consider on this giving everyone the authority to "kill" offensive posts: What about the occasional troll who shows up here solely for the purpose of posting hurtful or offensive comments? People like him could suddenly have the power to delete all posts, effectively disabling this group.

No easy answers, I guess.
Johnny said the ability to delete SPAM could be recinded for individuals that abuse the privledge.

_________________

CPAPopedia Keywords Contained In This Post (Click For Definition): Power

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 2:14 pm
by Darth Vader Look
Snoozin' Bluezzz wrote:To date I have not noticed a "registered" Troll. David

How soon we forget about Booty 1996.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:07 pm
by Snoozin' Bluezzz
Darth Vader Look wrote:
How soon we forget about Booty 1996.
Booty 1996 wasn't a troll, Booty was a fool, a moron, an idiot, probably a teen-ager or younger. But, you are correct Booty may have been wacko enough to maliciously delete posts.

David

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:27 pm
by mousetater
For those who would like the whole thread to be deleted when marked as spam, this would work where the spammer started a new thread. But what happens when the spammer replies to an otherwise legitimate thread. We don't want the whole thread deleted.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:33 pm
by Guest
It only deletes the post. Not the whole thread.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by mousetater
I understand that. But someone was asking if the whole thread could be deleted instead of just the post. This was related to a thread where the spam was the only post. My comment was that solution could cause a problem where spam is posted in an ongoing thread.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:17 pm
by roztom
Thanks Johnney.

Tom

Malicious registered users

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:28 pm
by ozij
Consecutive spam deletions could be limited to - for instance 5 - which would limit the damage caused by a malicious registered user.

O.

Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:52 pm
by Ric
How about if Johnny could sell spam ammo (SPAMMO?), how much would you pay to delete a spam? It is SO VERY satisfying ya know... It could be a whole new product line. Might we establish a secondary market to buy and sell those magic bullets? (including futures and options of course.) How many are lurking here just waiting for that magic moment? Seems the average lifespan of a spam (LIFESPAM?) is measured in seconds. What if we delete them all and they never come back, won't THAT be a sad moment... HEY! WHAT AM I THINKING??? *SLAP*

-Ric

Spammo & Lifespam

Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:10 am
by kteague
Cookie Monster Ric - Too funny!