Page 5 of 6

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 1:55 pm
by Gasper62
Guest wrote:
Gasper62 wrote:t help. You need it, badly
the one who needs help here is the one with multiple logons to troll this forum meaning you pale boy.

let's face the honest truth here you do not have any authority to do anything with me or anyone else on this forum. bring yourself back to reality and realize this is not your forum not your world and i am sorry it took jedimark so long to realize what you are like i remember when he defended you.
Here. Familiarize yourself, would you ? LMAO

com·ma
/ˈkämə/
noun

noun: comma; plural noun: commas; noun: comma butterfly; plural noun: comma butterflies
1.
a punctuation mark (,) indicating a pause between parts of a sentence. It is also used to separate items in a list and to mark the place of thousands in a large numeral.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:08 pm
by Hang Fire
Gasper62 wrote:Here. Familiarize yourself, would you ? LMAO

com·ma
/ˈkämə/
noun

noun: comma; plural noun: commas; noun: comma butterfly; plural noun: comma butterflies
1.
a punctuation mark (,) indicating a pause between parts of a sentence. It is also used to separate items in a list and to mark the place of thousands in a large numeral.
He/she could also use this one.
capitalization
[kap-i-tl-uh-zey-shuh n]

http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/capital.asp

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:13 pm
by Sheffey
Oops. Editing the post because I clicked the wrong Quote button.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 3:18 pm
by Sheffey
GettingBetter wrote:advice that should be left to the patient's Doctor.
Are you issuing sound opinion, or do you just have an ax to grind because of your inability to contribute to the forum in a positive way?

There are a few trolls on here constantly causing trouble, and PaleRider is not one of them.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:00 pm
by GettingBetter
Sheffey wrote:
GettingBetter wrote:advice that should be left to the patient's Doctor.
Are you issuing sound opinion, or do you just have an ax to grind because of your inability to contribute to the forum in a positive way?

There are a few trolls on here constantly causing trouble, and PaleRider is not one of them.
Sheffey,

I see a lot of negativity as a serious liability. The forum is not a substitute for seeing a competent medical professional and changing doctors if you need to, the notification below says so.

I have no dog in this race, but I do see the negativity and the INTERNET DOCTORING (also referring to doctors as idiots) as monetarily harmful if action is taken - especially if CPAP.com is referring clients to this website for technical support. Even without trying this could be a nice rainy day for an attorney or three. Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation. (Or the owners can take a chance - keep in mind that if you ask your attorney they would be paid in the litigation so it is kinda like asking the fox how best to guard the hen house.)

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:09 pm
by Sheffey
GettingBetter wrote:Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation.
Maybe YOU will be sued for $600k for offering legal advice without a license to practice law.

(Your IP address is easily traced.)

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:11 pm
by LSAT
Guest wrote:
Gasper62 wrote:I say PR should stay. You should be the one to go. (at least until you gain enough nerve show your identity)
i should point out that it is because of attitudes like this that people just refuse to join or become part of a rude obnoxious community
why would anyone with the ability to reason want to


There are over 78,000 current registered members. This is why I have always proposed only registered members be allowed to post.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:37 pm
by GettingBetter
Sheffey wrote:
GettingBetter wrote:Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation.
Maybe YOU will be sued for $600k for offering legal advice without a license to practice law.

(Your IP address is easily traced.)
LOL hardly. Trace away.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 5:24 pm
by LSAT
CPAP Sarge wrote:WHAT IS YOUR MAJOR MALFUNCTION ?!!
Major Malfunction outranks Sarge.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 6:09 pm
by Sonnyboy
Sheffey wrote:
GettingBetter wrote:Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation.
Maybe YOU will be sued for $600k for offering legal advice without a license to practice law.

(Your IP address is easily traced.)
GettingBetter,

Why are you constantly negating this forum and members you choose not to like?

Forum members are providing education.
They are not going into the home, setting up the machine, changing pressures, etc.
They are not wearing white coats and masquerading as licensed professionals in a health care facility.
They are not billing Medicare or Medicaid.
There is no law against calling someone an idiot.
There is no law against a patient reading a clinical manual.
There is no law against a patient changing their pressure.
Are you suggesting lawyers sue CPAP patients too? Good luck with that.

Why do you have a problem with education?

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:48 pm
by Lucyhere
Sonnyboy wrote:There is no law against calling someone an idiot.

Oh, thank goodness... now I can call you an idiot and not have a worry in the world.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 7:51 pm
by Lucyhere
Sheffey wrote:(Your IP address is easily traced.)
Maybe in the year 1953.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2016 10:14 pm
by GettingBetter
Sonnyboy wrote:
Sheffey wrote:
GettingBetter wrote:Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation.
Maybe YOU will be sued for $600k for offering legal advice without a license to practice law.

(Your IP address is easily traced.)
GettingBetter,

Why are you constantly negating this forum and members you choose not to like?

Forum members are providing education. Agreed. In some states this is the purview of licensed professionals. Can't pump your own gas in New Jersey either, or couldn't not sure if that is still true.
They are not going into the home, setting up the machine, changing pressures, etc. No, but you are asking (demanding in many cases) for home data and making judgments and comments that are presented as medical advice.
They are not wearing white coats and masquerading as licensed professionals in a health care facility. But it is being done on this forum in a pretty sneaky way.
They are not billing Medicare or Medicaid. Nope but they are working with Medicare patients that purchase from the Website and may be referred to the website. Also, if "compensation" to advisory members is in the form of kickbacks, discounts or other it opens a giant can of worms.
There is no law against calling someone an idiot. If you are calling into question medical advice to negate it and insert your own medical advice - there might be a law or three on that one.
There is no law against a patient reading a clinical manual.
There is no law against a patient changing their pressure. - If that patient thinks he/she is getting professional advice because of the lack of moderation and the way the internet doc presents, could be.

Are you suggesting lawyers sue CPAP patients too? Good luck with that. <== Why do you have a problem with education?

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:09 am
by Jenk2k
Sheesh.

Re: Ice in humidifier chamber

Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:44 am
by Sonnyboy
GettingBetter wrote:
Sonnyboy wrote:
Sheffey wrote:
GettingBetter wrote:Truthfully, I would just shut the site down because to continue after the $600 judgement (whether or not that holds) is to invite litigation.
Maybe YOU will be sued for $600k for offering legal advice without a license to practice law.

(Your IP address is easily traced.)
GettingBetter,

Why are you constantly negating this forum and members you choose not to like?

Forum members are providing education. Agreed. In some states this is the purview of licensed professionals. Can't pump your own gas in New Jersey either, or couldn't not sure if that is still true.There is no state law that prevents education. The "state authorities" are not removing medical literature from the libraries or banning people from using medical libraries. There are countries that ban women from an education. Where exactly do you live?

They are not going into the home, setting up the machine, changing pressures, etc. No, but you are asking (demanding in many cases) for home data and making judgments and comments that are presented as medical advice. The information on this website is not presented as medical advice.

They are not wearing white coats and masquerading as licensed professionals in a health care facility. But it is being done on this forum in a pretty sneaky way.
Please explain.

They are not billing Medicare or Medicaid. Nope but they are working with Medicare patients that purchase from the Website and may be referred to the website. .
This statement alone shows how misinformed you really are. Medicare does not reimburse purchases on this website. Medicare does not prevent patients from paying cash for supplies.

Also, if "compensation" to advisory members is in the form of kickbacks, discounts or other it opens a giant can of worms.

There are no "advisory" members on this forum. I am not aware of "kickbacks" or "discounts".

There is no law against calling someone an idiot. If you are calling into question medical advice to negate it and insert your own medical advice - there might be a law or three on that one.
No one is presenting them self as a doctor or health care provider.

There is no law against a patient reading a clinical manual.

There is no law against a patient changing their pressure. - If that patient thinks he/she is getting professional advice because of the lack of moderation and the way the internet doc presents, could be.
What "internet doc".

Are you suggesting lawyers sue CPAP patients too? Good luck with that. <== Why do you have a problem with education?
Why are you pushing misinformed legal advice on a self help forum?