Page 2 of 2
Re: low AHI vs. leaks
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:01 pm
by Guest
first, you are *ASS-U-MEing* that her leak numbers are REALLY BAD, without ANY indication of what they are. are they just above the 24lpm line, are they 50-100-150lpm? YOU DO NOT KNOW. the distinction is important, as has been said before.... therefore, the most appropriate comment is the second one in this thread.
secondly, in your ignorance (ignorance can be cured, should one stop being so hard headed) you're confusing leak numbers from -- and advice about -- a machine that is generations older than the one the OP has, and had different requirements, AND that behaved differently. if you knew more, you might stop mixing up your fruits when getting info. a 10.3lps leak from the machine in the thread that you referenced is a truly huge leak. are the OPs leaks truly huge? YOU DO NOT KNOW, no data has been posted.
blah blah blah....I've moved on. You're a maddening fellow to talk to. It's ok to say I'm wrong, but you do in a way that's offensive, as I've seen from a couple of others here that you've tangled with.
Re: low AHI vs. leaks
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:18 pm
by palerider
Guest wrote:blah blah blah....I've moved on. You're a maddening fellow to talk to. It's ok to say I'm wrong, but you do in a way that's offensive, as I've seen from a couple of others here that you've tangled with.
ok, you're wrong.
how's that?
Re: low AHI vs. leaks
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:27 pm
by grifho
ok, you're wrong.
how's that?
Well, no. If someone's wrong, you don't come out and say it like that. You acknowledge what they say is right (if anything), and then tell them where they are wrong without using the word "wrong". It's called tact. Not your strength, but it takes all types I guess.
And you did give me a loophole there. I may have made an invalid assumption, but perhaps the leaks were super high, in which case I would have been right. If so, lucky guess, but right.
Re: low AHI vs. leaks
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:40 pm
by palerider
grifho wrote: I would have been right. If so, lucky guess, but right.
when you're more concerned with finding accuracy, and less with being
right, I'll have more respect for you.
though, trust me, I don't expect that you care at all how much respect for you I have.
Re: low AHI vs. leaks
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:58 pm
by grifho
when you're more concerned with finding accuracy, and less with being right, I'll have more respect for you.
though, trust me, I don't expect that you care at all how much respect for you I have.
I don't think I have a particularly vested interest in being right. In fact, in my thread for "Less Leaks" I speculated on something, and asked for feedback. It's just that your tone of response, and nit-picking on side issues, put me immediately in a defensive mode, and therefore I held my ground more than ever. I mean, you also sound like you want to be right as well, and you do have the weight of your experience and knowledge behind you, and I respect that, whether you respect me or not.