CPAPtalk.com

The thread doesn't need to be deleted. Just report the first post as spam and it goes poof except for those with the secret sauce to read it.

Uh, I removed my links, but I guess I got them all too. I can be asked...
It doesn't take long to send someone the link to the directories...
And a whole subtree can be downloaded at once.

I guess someone else should do the reporting - I don't have any kind of sauce to do anything if something went wrong.

Well, I don't want a pickle.

Look up the story of Kim Dotcom. The US government sent jackbooted FBI thugs to invade his house in New Zealand because he had a site where people could store their data.

Be afraid of your government. Be very afraid.

archangle wrote:Look up the story of Kim Dotcom. The US government sent jackbooted FBI thugs to invade his house in New Zealand because he had a site where people could store their data.

Be afraid of your government. Be very afraid.

that's very helpful...

archangle wrote:Look up the story of Kim Dotcom. The US government sent jackbooted FBI thugs to invade his house in New Zealand because he had a site where people could store their data.

Be afraid of your government. Be very afraid.

But does the internet have boundaries? I'm not saying what happened in dotcom's situation was right or wrong but do the laws in the US regarding the internet end at the coastlines?

archangle wrote:Look up the story of Kim Dotcom.

I think he uses a BiPAP at 20/12.

I find the literature in my possession to be somewhat long-winded,
containing a fair amount of spurious promotional text. (Easily over 15%)
Perhaps I might only share a review, with the barest outline of functional description.
Bootlegging an entire copy may be frowned upon, whereas reviews are permitted most anywhere.
Does this sound advisable?

chunkyfrog wrote:I find the literature in my possession to be somewhat long-winded,
containing a fair amount of spurious promotional text. (Easily over 15%)
Perhaps I might only share a review, with the barest outline of functional description.
Bootlegging an entire copy may be frowned upon, whereas reviews are permitted most anywhere.
Does this sound advisable?

I get what you are saying but are you really just reviewing a product? I mean if the parent company is going to come after people they could clearly show intent using the fact that you have any of the so called clinician info. Where did you get that info? Where did that place get the info? There's a trail. It really sucks we don't have the freedom to do what we want in this case. Places like (give me a moment because I have to jog my memory)...Napster? got shut down for allowing people to download and share music but yet you can go to youtube and download videos, movies, etc. using 3rd party software. Curious why no one has stopped that yet.

Ah, but my review would critique the machine as well as the various functions of the buttons/dials.
I guarantee there are changes I would suggest, as any competent reviewer should be totally honest and ORIGINAL.

Besides, I peeked when my doctor left the room; and you all know how long they make you wait
for the lab to finish processing a specimen.

chunkyfrog wrote:Ah, but my review would critique the machine as well as the various functions of the buttons/dials.
I guarantee there are changes I would suggest, as any competent reviewer should be totally honest and ORIGINAL.

Besides, I peeked when my doctor left the room; and you all know how long they make you wait
for the lab to finish processing a specimen.

Better idea (maybe). I've just spent some time reading that sticky by Mollete and it's full of great info! Maybe we could all change our user names to some form of Mollete like Mollete the froggie, etc. No one would ever be able to sort us all out that way!

postitnote wrote:

archangle wrote:Look up the story of Kim Dotcom. The US government sent jackbooted FBI thugs to invade his house in New Zealand because he had a site where people could store their data.

Be afraid of your government. Be very afraid.

But does the internet have boundaries? I'm not saying what happened in dotcom's situation was right or wrong but do the laws in the US regarding the internet end at the coastlines?

Obviously, the jackbooted FBI thugs don't think so.

What I would like to know is how does my being able to sleep and breathe at the same time a threat to national security?

postitnote wrote:

chunkyfrog wrote:Ah, but my review would critique the machine as well as the various functions of the buttons/dials.
I guarantee there are changes I would suggest, as any competent reviewer should be totally honest and ORIGINAL.

Besides, I peeked when my doctor left the room; and you all know how long they make you wait
for the lab to finish processing a specimen.

Better idea (maybe). I've just spent some time reading that sticky by Mollete and it's full of great info! Maybe we could all change our user names to some form of Mollete like Mollete the froggie, etc. No one would ever be able to sort us all out that way!

I was thinking of concluding the list with "PM anyone in this thread for details".

Or what else anyone got? Volunteer librarians? A set up like dsm had?